NCT06509282

Brief Summary

Aim: To determine the efficacy of a personalized concurrent exercise prescription guide combined with pharmacological treatment compared to pharmacological treatment alone in controlling cardiovascular risk factors and physical capacity in adults enrolled in a Cardiovascular Health Program. Research Design: This pilot randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) evaluates the efficacy of a personalized concurrent exercise prescription guide combined with pharmacological treatment versus pharmacological treatment alone. Outcomes: blood pressure, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, and triglycerides, muscle strength, cardiorespiratory capacity, body composition, adherence to the exercise guide, and patient perception of intervention effects, sociodemographic and medical background, physical activity level, Population: Adult users of the Cardiovascular Health Program at the External CESFAM in Valdivia will be recruited during regular check-up hours. Detailed study information will be provided, and informed consent obtained. Sample Size: The sample size is 15 subjects per group, accounting for a 30% dropout rate, resulting in 39 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to experimental (EG) or control groups (CG) with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Allocation concealment will be ensured with opaque, sealed envelopes. Evaluations: Pre- and post-intervention evaluations will be conducted in both groups. Sociodemographic and medical background information will be collected through clinical record reviews. Blood pressure, heart rate, glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, adherence to the exercise guide, and patient perception of intervention effects will be measured using standardized procedures by trained kinesiologists.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
39

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 29, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 8, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 8, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 24, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 19, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 19, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

May 24, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 12, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

ExerciseConcurrent trainingCardiovascular riskPhysical FitnessGlobal rate scaleAdherence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (14)

  • Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Pressure in the arteries during and between heartbeats. (mmHg)

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks.

  • Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)

    Measure of the average pressure in a person's arteries during one cardiac cycle. MAP=Diastolic Blood Pressure + 1/3 (Systolic Blood Pressure-Diastolic Blood Pressure). mmHg

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks.

  • Heart Rate

    Number of heartbeats per minute. (bpm)

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks.

  • Fasting Glucose

    Blood glucose level after a fasting period. (mg/dL)

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks.

  • Cholesterol

    Blood cholesterol refers to the total amount of cholesterol present in the bloodstream. (mg/dL)

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks.

  • Triglycerides

    Blood triglycerides are a type of fat (lipid) found in the bloodstream. (mg/dL)

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks.

  • Body Mass Index

    The Body Mass Index (BMI) is a metric used to assess the relationship between an individual's weight and height, thereby estimating their weight category, which can range from underweight to obesity. It is calculated by dividing a person's weight in kilograms by the square of their height in meters. The formula is: BMI = weight (kg) / \[height (m)\]\^2 The unit of measurement for BMI is kg/m² (kilograms per square meter).

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks.

  • Lean Mass

    Lean mass, also known as lean body mass, refers to the portion of the body that is not composed of fat. It includes muscles, bones, internal organs, skin, body water, and other fat-free tissues. The unit of measurement for lean mass is (%).

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks.

  • Fat Mass

    Fat mass refers to the total amount of fat tissue in the body. The unit of measurement for lean mass is (%).

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks.

  • Handgrip strength

    Handgrip Dynamometry: Measurement of handgrip strength. (kgf)

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks.

  • Cardiorespiratory fitness

    2-Minute Step Test (2MST): is a functional fitness assessment used to evaluate an individual's cardiorespiratory fitness. During this test, the participant is instructed to march in place for two minutes, lifting their knees to a height midway between the patella (kneecap) and the iliac crest (hip bone). The goal is to count the number of times the right knee reaches the target height within the two-minute period. The primary unit of measurement for the 2-Minute Step Test is the number of steps, specifically the number of times the right knee reaches the required height within the two-minute duration.

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks.

  • VO2 peak

    Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) refers to the maximum amount of oxygen the body can utilize during intense exercise. It is measured in milliliters of oxygen consumed per kilogram of body weight per minute (ml/kg/min). Using the number of steps in the 2-minute walk test, VO2peak will be estimated. The equation to estimate peak oxygen consumption is: VO2 (mL⋅kg-1⋅min-1) = 13.341 + 0.138 × total steps - (0.183 × BMI).

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks.

  • Treatment Adherence

    In the context of this study, treatment adherence refers to the extent to which participants follow the prescribed physical exercise regimen. This variable is operationalized as the completion of at least 70% of the scheduled exercise sessions. A participant will be considered "adherent" if they complete at least 70% of the scheduled exercise sessions, according to the data obtained through the described measurement methods. This figure is calculated by dividing the number of completed sessions by the total number of scheduled sessions and multiplying the result by 100.

    Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks.

  • Global Rating Scale

    The Global Rating Scale (GRS) will be applied as an instrument for evaluating the patient's perception of changes experienced in their health status, functionality, or symptoms. The methodology for implementing the GRS will involve asking patients to provide a rating of their current health status compared to an established reference point, which, in our case, will be the beginning of the study. The GRS will be presented in two formats: Numeric: Offering a range that can vary, for example, from -7 (much worse) to +7 (much better), allowing for a gradable assessment of changes. Descriptive: Providing qualitative terms such as "much worse," "no change," or "much better," facilitating patients' expression of their perception of change in a more narrative manner. The "unit" of measurement for the GRS is the position on the numeric scale or the descriptive term that best represents the patient's perception of change.

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program. Post-Intervention (Week 6): Final evaluation after 6 weeks.

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Gender

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program.

  • Age

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program.

  • Ancestry

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program.

  • Education Level

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program.

  • Duration in Cardiovascular Health Program

    Pre-Intervention: Initial assessment before starting the training program.

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Concurrent training

EXPERIMENTAL

Concurrent training group

Behavioral: Concurrent training

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Control group

Interventions

Protocol: Duration: 6 weeks. Frequency: 3 times a week. Type: Concurrent. This consists of a combination of aerobic exercise and muscular resistance exercise. Details of the type of exercise: Aerobic exercise: Participants will perform 5-10 intervals per session of walking or jogging at a moderate to high intensity, with a rating of 5 to 10 points on the modified Borg scale of 1-10 points. Each interval will consist of 1 minute of walking or jogging, followed by 2 minutes of inactive pause. Muscular resistance exercise: Participants will perform concentric and eccentric and/or isometric contractions for 1 minute at an intensity of 5-10 according to the OMNI-RES scale. The rest period will last 2 minutes, and each exercise will be repeated 3 times. Three exercises per session will be performed: squats, push-ups, and plank. Pharmacological treatment: Participants will be asked to maintain their lifestyle, including taking prescribed medication as usual.

Concurrent training

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Being physically inactive (not engaging in 300 or 150 minutes of moderate or vigorous intensity physical activity per week, respectively, as measured by the IPAQ questionnaire);
  • Body mass index between 25 and 39.9 kg/m²;
  • Enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Program;
  • Diagnosis of hypertension with the use of 1 and/or 2 antihypertensive medications;
  • Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with the use of 1 oral hypoglycemic agent, non-insulin-dependent;
  • Diagnosis of dyslipidemia with the use of 1 lipid-lowering agent;
  • Possession of a telephone device.

You may not qualify if:

  • Bone disease;
  • Ischemic disease or arrhythmia;
  • Chronic respiratory disease;
  • Uncontrolled chronic diseases;
  • Inability to provide informed consent or comply with the tests and exercise protocol for any reason;
  • History of oncological disease or being under investigation for suspected neoplastic disease in any part of the body;
  • Female participants who are pregnant.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universidad San Sebastián

Valdivia, Los Ríos Region, Chile

Location

Related Publications (50)

  • Yusuf S, Joseph P, Rangarajan S, Islam S, Mente A, Hystad P, Brauer M, Kutty VR, Gupta R, Wielgosz A, AlHabib KF, Dans A, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Avezum A, Lanas F, Oguz A, Kruger IM, Diaz R, Yusoff K, Mony P, Chifamba J, Yeates K, Kelishadi R, Yusufali A, Khatib R, Rahman O, Zatonska K, Iqbal R, Wei L, Bo H, Rosengren A, Kaur M, Mohan V, Lear SA, Teo KK, Leong D, O'Donnell M, McKee M, Dagenais G. Modifiable risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in 155 722 individuals from 21 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020 Mar 7;395(10226):795-808. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32008-2. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

    PMID: 31492503BACKGROUND
  • Nazzal C, Lefian A, Alonso F. [Incidence of acute myocardial infarction in Chile between 2008 and 2016]. Rev Med Chil. 2021 Mar;149(3):323-329. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872021000300323. Spanish.

    PMID: 34479310BACKGROUND
  • Parra-Soto S, Petermann-Rocha F, Martinez-Sanguinetti MA, Leiva-Ordenez AM, Troncoso-Pantoja C, Ulloa N, Diaz-Martinez X, Celis-Morales C. [Cancer in Chile and worldwide: an overview of the current and future epidemiological context]. Rev Med Chil. 2020 Oct;148(10):1489-1495. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872020001001489. Spanish.

    PMID: 33844720BACKGROUND
  • Celis-Morales C, Salas C, Martinez MA, Leiva AM, Garrido-Mendez A, Diaz-Martinez X. [The economic burden of physical inactivity in Chile]. Rev Med Chil. 2017 Aug;145(8):1091-1092. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872017000801091. No abstract available. Spanish.

    PMID: 29189871BACKGROUND
  • Pratt M, Macera CA, Wang G. Higher direct medical costs associated with physical inactivity. Phys Sportsmed. 2000 Oct;28(10):63-70. doi: 10.3810/psm.2000.10.1237.

    PMID: 20086598BACKGROUND
  • Teo KK, Rafiq T. Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Prevention: A Perspective From Developing Countries. Can J Cardiol. 2021 May;37(5):733-743. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

    PMID: 33610690BACKGROUND
  • Pucci GC, Rech CR, Fermino RC, Reis RS. Association between physical activity and quality of life in adults. Rev Saude Publica. 2012 Feb;46(1):166-79. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102012000100021. English, Portuguese.

    PMID: 22249758BACKGROUND
  • Geidl W, Schlesinger S, Mino E, Miranda L, Pfeifer K. Dose-response relationship between physical activity and mortality in adults with noncommunicable diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Aug 26;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01007-5.

    PMID: 32843054BACKGROUND
  • DeMarco VG, Aroor AR, Sowers JR. The pathophysiology of hypertension in patients with obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014 Jun;10(6):364-76. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2014.44. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

    PMID: 24732974BACKGROUND
  • Bergouignan A, Rudwill F, Simon C, Blanc S. Physical inactivity as the culprit of metabolic inflexibility: evidence from bed-rest studies. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Oct;111(4):1201-10. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00698.2011. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

    PMID: 21836047BACKGROUND
  • Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, McQueen M, Budaj A, Pais P, Varigos J, Lisheng L; INTERHEART Study Investigators. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004 Sep 11-17;364(9438):937-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9.

    PMID: 15364185BACKGROUND
  • Diaz-Martinez X, Petermann F, Leiva AM, Garrido-Mendez A, Salas-Bravo C, Martinez MA, Labrana AM, Duran E, Valdivia-Moral P, Zagalaz ML, Poblete-Valderrama F, Alvarez C, Celis-Morales C. [Association of physical inactivity with obesity, diabetes, hypertension and metabolic syndrome in the chilean population]. Rev Med Chil. 2018 May;146(5):585-595. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872018000500585. Spanish.

    PMID: 30148922BACKGROUND
  • Lear SA, Hu W, Rangarajan S, Gasevic D, Leong D, Iqbal R, Casanova A, Swaminathan S, Anjana RM, Kumar R, Rosengren A, Wei L, Yang W, Chuangshi W, Huaxing L, Nair S, Diaz R, Swidon H, Gupta R, Mohammadifard N, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Oguz A, Zatonska K, Seron P, Avezum A, Poirier P, Teo K, Yusuf S. The effect of physical activity on mortality and cardiovascular disease in 130 000 people from 17 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: the PURE study. Lancet. 2017 Dec 16;390(10113):2643-2654. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31634-3. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

    PMID: 28943267BACKGROUND
  • Cristi-Montero C, Ramirez-Campillo R, Alvarez C, Garrido Mendez A, Martinez MA, Diaz Martinez X, Leiva AM, Salas C, Gutierrez M, Sanzana-Inzunza R, Duran E, Labrana AM, Aguilar-Farias N, Celis-Morales C. [Inverse association of cardiorespiratory fitness with cardiovascular risk factors in Chilean adults]. Rev Med Chil. 2016 Aug;144(8):980-989. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872016000800004. Spanish.

    PMID: 27905643BACKGROUND
  • Arija V, Villalobos F, Pedret R, Vinuesa A, Timon M, Basora T, Aguas D, Basora J; Pas-a-Pas research group. Effectiveness of a physical activity program on cardiovascular disease risk in adult primary health-care users: the "Pas-a-Pas" community intervention trial. BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 15;17(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4485-3.

    PMID: 28619115BACKGROUND
  • Pavey TG, Taylor AH, Fox KR, Hillsdon M, Anokye N, Campbell JL, Foster C, Green C, Moxham T, Mutrie N, Searle J, Trueman P, Taylor RS. Effect of exercise referral schemes in primary care on physical activity and improving health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011 Nov 4;343:d6462. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6462.

    PMID: 22058134BACKGROUND
  • Campbell F, Holmes M, Everson-Hock E, Davis S, Buckley Woods H, Anokye N, Tappenden P, Kaltenthaler E. A systematic review and economic evaluation of exercise referral schemes in primary care: a short report. Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(60):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta19600.

    PMID: 26222987BACKGROUND
  • Williams NH, Hendry M, France B, Lewis R, Wilkinson C. Effectiveness of exercise-referral schemes to promote physical activity in adults: systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Dec;57(545):979-86. doi: 10.3399/096016407782604866.

    PMID: 18252074BACKGROUND
  • Cano-Montoya J, Ramirez-Campillo R, Sade Calles F, Izquierdo M, Fritz Silva N, Arteaga San Martin R, Alvarez C. [Effects of a six weeks exercise training program for type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertensive patients]. Rev Med Chil. 2018 Jun;146(6):693-701. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872018000600693. Spanish.

    PMID: 30148900BACKGROUND
  • Cano-Montoya J, Ramirez-Campillo R, Martinez C, Sade-Calles F, Salas-Parada A, Alvarez C. [Interaction between antihypertensive therapy and exercise training therapy requires drug regulation in hypertensive patients]. Rev Med Chil. 2016 Feb;144(2):152-61. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872016000200002. Spanish.

    PMID: 27092668BACKGROUND
  • Alvarez C, Ramirez-Campillo R, Martinez-Salazar C, Mancilla R, Flores-Opazo M, Cano-Montoya J, Ciolac EG. Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training as a Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes. Int J Sports Med. 2016 Aug;37(9):723-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-104935. Epub 2016 Jun 3.

    PMID: 27259099BACKGROUND
  • Cadore EL, Izquierdo M. How to simultaneously optimize muscle strength, power, functional capacity, and cardiovascular gains in the elderly: an update. Age (Dordr). 2013 Dec;35(6):2329-44. doi: 10.1007/s11357-012-9503-x. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

    PMID: 23288690BACKGROUND
  • Teodoro JL, Izquierdo M, da Silva LXN, Baroni BM, Grazioli R, Lopez P, Fritsch CG, Radaelli R, Saez de Asteasu ML, Bottaro M, Farinha JB, Pinto RS, Cadore EL. Effects of long-term concurrent training to failure or not in muscle power output, muscle quality and cardiometabolic risk factors in older men: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Exp Gerontol. 2020 Oct 1;139:111023. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2020.111023. Epub 2020 Jul 19.

    PMID: 32697957BACKGROUND
  • Higham SM, Mendham AE, Rosenbaum S, Allen NG, Smith G, Stadnyk A, Duffield R. Effects of concurrent exercise training on body composition, systemic inflammation, and components of metabolic syndrome in inactive academics: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023 Apr;123(4):809-820. doi: 10.1007/s00421-022-05108-w. Epub 2022 Dec 6.

    PMID: 36471186BACKGROUND
  • Alvarez C, Ramirez-Velez R, Ramirez-Campillo R, Lucia A, Alonso-Martinez AM, Faundez H, Cadore EL, Izquierdo M. Improvements cardiometabolic risk factors in Latin American Amerindians (the Mapuche) with concurrent training. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Jun;29(6):886-896. doi: 10.1111/sms.13409. Epub 2019 Mar 12.

    PMID: 30770586BACKGROUND
  • Amaro-Gahete FJ, Ponce-Gonzalez JG, Corral-Perez J, Velazquez-Diaz D, Lavie CJ, Jimenez-Pavon D. Effect of a 12-Week Concurrent Training Intervention on Cardiometabolic Health in Obese Men: A Pilot Study. Front Physiol. 2021 Feb 11;12:630831. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.630831. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 33643072BACKGROUND
  • Gao J, Yu L. Effects of concurrent training sequence on VO2max and lower limb strength performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol. 2023 Jan 26;14:1072679. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1072679. eCollection 2023.

    PMID: 36776981BACKGROUND
  • Gibala MJ, Little JP, Macdonald MJ, Hawley JA. Physiological adaptations to low-volume, high-intensity interval training in health and disease. J Physiol. 2012 Mar 1;590(5):1077-84. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.224725. Epub 2012 Jan 30.

    PMID: 22289907BACKGROUND
  • Hawley JA, Hargreaves M, Joyner MJ, Zierath JR. Integrative biology of exercise. Cell. 2014 Nov 6;159(4):738-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.029.

    PMID: 25417152BACKGROUND
  • Coffey VG, Hawley JA. The molecular bases of training adaptation. Sports Med. 2007;37(9):737-63. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200737090-00001.

    PMID: 17722947BACKGROUND
  • Goodpaster BH, Sparks LM. Metabolic Flexibility in Health and Disease. Cell Metab. 2017 May 2;25(5):1027-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.015.

    PMID: 28467922BACKGROUND
  • Freese J, Klement RJ, Ruiz-Nunez B, Schwarz S, Lotzerich H. The sedentary (r)evolution: Have we lost our metabolic flexibility? F1000Res. 2017 Oct 2;6:1787. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12724.2. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 29225776BACKGROUND
  • Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Exercise as medicine - evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Dec;25 Suppl 3:1-72. doi: 10.1111/sms.12581.

    PMID: 26606383BACKGROUND
  • Islam H, Gibala MJ, Little JP. Exercise Snacks: A Novel Strategy to Improve Cardiometabolic Health. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2022 Jan 1;50(1):31-37. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000275.

    PMID: 34669625BACKGROUND
  • Thornton JS, Fremont P, Khan K, Poirier P, Fowles J, Wells GD, Frankovich RJ. Physical activity prescription: a critical opportunity to address a modifiable risk factor for the prevention and management of chronic disease: a position statement by the Canadian Academy of Sport and Exercise Medicine. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Sep;50(18):1109-14. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096291. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

    PMID: 27335208BACKGROUND
  • Moore CG, Carter RE, Nietert PJ, Stewart PW. Recommendations for planning pilot studies in clinical and translational research. Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Oct;4(5):332-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00347.x.

    PMID: 22029804BACKGROUND
  • Christensen E. Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials. J Hepatol. 2007 May;46(5):947-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.02.015. Epub 2007 Mar 9.

    PMID: 17412447BACKGROUND
  • Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1057-73. doi: 10.1177/0962280215588241. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

    PMID: 26092476BACKGROUND
  • Takahashi H, Yoshika M, Yokoi T. Validation of three automatic devices for the self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010: the Omron HEM-7130, HEM-7320F, and HEM-7500F. Blood Press Monit. 2015 Apr;20(2):92-7. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000096.

    PMID: 25462531BACKGROUND
  • Pleus S, Baumstark A, Schauer S, Kolle J, Jendrike N, Mende J, Haug C, Freckmann G. User Performance Evaluation and System Accuracy Assessment of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems With Color Coding of Measurement Results. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 May;18(3):644-652. doi: 10.1177/19322968221141926. Epub 2022 Nov 26.

    PMID: 36433806BACKGROUND
  • Coqueiro Rda S, Santos MC, Neto Jde S, Queiroz BM, Brugger NA, Barbosa AR. Validity of a portable glucose, total cholesterol, and triglycerides multi-analyzer in adults. Biol Res Nurs. 2014 Jul;16(3):288-94. doi: 10.1177/1099800413495953. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

    PMID: 23871994BACKGROUND
  • Huang L, Liu Y, Lin T, Hou L, Song Q, Ge N, Yue J. Reliability and validity of two hand dynamometers when used by community-dwelling adults aged over 50 years. BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 15;22(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03270-6.

    PMID: 35840905BACKGROUND
  • Geeta A, Jamaiyah H, Safiza MN, Khor GL, Kee CC, Ahmad AZ, Suzana S, Rahmah R, Faudzi A. Reliability, technical error of measurements and validity of instruments for nutritional status assessment of adults in Malaysia. Singapore Med J. 2009 Oct;50(10):1013-8.

    PMID: 19907894BACKGROUND
  • Vasold KL, Parks AC, Phelan DML, Pontifex MB, Pivarnik JM. Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Low-Cost Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2019 Jul 1;29(4):406-410. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0283.

    PMID: 30507268BACKGROUND
  • Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW, Wyrwich KW, Norman GR; Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 Apr;77(4):371-83. doi: 10.4065/77.4.371.

    PMID: 11936935BACKGROUND
  • Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.163.

    PMID: 20046623BACKGROUND
  • Alvarez C, Ramirez-Campillo R, Lucia A, Ramirez-Velez R, Izquierdo M. Concurrent exercise training on hyperglycemia and comorbidities associated: Non-responders using clinical cutoff points. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Jul;29(7):952-967. doi: 10.1111/sms.13413. Epub 2019 Apr 9.

    PMID: 30825342BACKGROUND
  • Ciolac EG, Mantuani SS, Neiva CM, Verardi C, Pessoa-Filho DM, Pimenta L. Rating of perceived exertion as a tool for prescribing and self regulating interval training: a pilot study. Biol Sport. 2015 Jun;32(2):103-8. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1134312. Epub 2015 Jan 15.

    PMID: 26028809BACKGROUND
  • Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Rutkowski J, Lenz B, Dixon C, Timmer J, Frazee K, Dube J, Andreacci J. Concurrent validation of the OMNI perceived exertion scale for resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Feb;35(2):333-41. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000048831.15016.2A.

    PMID: 12569225BACKGROUND
  • Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, Carty C, Chaput JP, Chastin S, Chou R, Dempsey PC, DiPietro L, Ekelund U, Firth J, Friedenreich CM, Garcia L, Gichu M, Jago R, Katzmarzyk PT, Lambert E, Leitzmann M, Milton K, Ortega FB, Ranasinghe C, Stamatakis E, Tiedemann A, Troiano RP, van der Ploeg HP, Wari V, Willumsen JF. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955.

    PMID: 33239350BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Metabolic SyndromeMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Insulin ResistanceHyperinsulinismGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBehavior

Study Officials

  • Johnattan Cano Montoya, MSc.

    Universidad San Sebastián

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Johnattan Cano Montoya, MSc.

    Universidad San Sebastián

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Johnattan Cano Montoya, MSc.

    Universidad San Sebastián

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The concealment of allocation will be conducted by a researcher not involved in the clinical procedures of the intervention using the method of opaque, sealed, and consecutively numbered envelopes. The random sequence and allocation concealment allow for the control of selection bias. For enhanced bias control, the data analysis will be performed by a researcher blinded to the intervention groups.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2024

First Posted

July 19, 2024

Study Start

December 29, 2023

Primary Completion

March 8, 2024

Study Completion

March 8, 2024

Last Updated

July 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations