Effect of a School Intervention With Physical Activity on Executive Functions
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Previous studies have indicated the relationship between physical activity and cognitive performance, with movement being a promising tool for improving executive functions, especially during childhood, which is a period of intense brain development. Thus, the objective of this project is to verify a school physical activity intervention on executive functions and the relationships with cardiorespiratory fitness and motor coordination. This will be a randomized control trial in accordance with the Consort - Statement, including 118 children of both sexes; 60 in an experimental group and 58 in a control group. The children will follow their usual school routines, including Physical Education classes as part of the curriculum. The experimental group will also participate in an intervention for 12 weeks after school. The intervention will include three weekly physical exercise sessions, lasting between 50 and 60 minutes. The sessions will consist of activities involving games, sports, dance with a focus on aspects of motor coordination and cardiorespiratory fitness, as well as cognitive games. Assessments will be carried out at baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention and after the follow-up period. The students will undergo measurements of body mass and height, as well as nutritional classification using the body mass index (BMI). Following this, a general motor coordination test (KTK), a cardiorespiratory aptitude test (Léger), and tests to assess executive functions (Stroop and Corsi Block) will be applied. Data distribution will be verified using the Shapiro-Wilk's test. The comparisons between different moments (baseline, after 12 weeks, and at follow-up) will be performed using repeated measures ANOVA. Sphericity will be checked by Mauchly's test followed by the Greenhouse- Geisser correction when necessary. To identify differences, the Bonferroni correction will be applied. The significance level will be set at 5% (P\<0.05).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 3, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 2, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 26, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2025
CompletedMay 14, 2025
November 1, 2024
3 months
July 3, 2024
May 13, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Executive Functions
The executive functions will be assessed pre-protocol, after 12 weeks, and 8 weeks after the end of the intervention (follow-up period). Executive functions will be investigated in the domains of working memory, using the Corsi Block Test (Corsi, 1972; Kessels et al., 2000), and inhibitory control, investigated by the Stroop Test (Stroop, 1935; MacLeod, 1991). For both tests there will be familiarization and reproducibility of measurements for both the children and evaluator. The evaluation will be carried out by a single evaluator blind to group allocation.
Will be assessed pre-protocol, after 12 weeks, and 8 weeks after the end of the intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Will be assessed pre-protocol, after 12 weeks, and 8 weeks after the end of the intervention.
Other Outcomes (1)
Motor Coordination
Will be assessed pre-protocol, after 12 weeks, and 8 weeks after the end of the intervention.
Study Arms (2)
Experimental group
EXPERIMENTALThe children included in the experimental group will undergo 12 weeks of physical activity sessions, and it is mandatory that all children complete a minimum of two weekly sessions of physical activity for 50-60 minutes. The activities will consist of content such as motor and cognitive games, sports, dance, and gymnastics. The intensity of the sessions will be checked using accelerometry. The physical activity protocol is adapted from a previously described protocol (CMSP, 2021; Klem, Filha, Monteiro, 2017; Mazzoccante et al.; 2020; Paiano, 2019; Rodrigues, 2018; Rosini et al., 2014). Acceptance of the exercise program in the pediatric population has been previously observed in a pilot study.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe children will follow their usual school routines, including Physical Education classes as part of the curriculum
Interventions
The children included in the experimental group will undergo 12 weeks of physical activity sessions, and it is mandatory that all children complete a minimum of two weekly sessions of physical activity for 50-60 minutes. The activities will consist of content such as motor and cognitive games, sports, dance, and gymnastics. The intensity of the sessions will be checked using accelerometry. The physical activity protocol is adapted from a previously described protocol (CMSP, 2021; Klem, Filha, Monteiro, 2017; Mazzoccante et al.; 2020; Paiano, 2019; Rodrigues, 2018; Rosini et al., 2014). Acceptance of the exercise program in the pediatric population has been previously observed in a pilot study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy
- Neurotypical.
You may not qualify if:
- Clinical or historical of cardiovascular disease
- Hypertension
- Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
- Neurodiversity
- Not be taking any drugs
- Cannot participated in sports practices
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School
Nova Fátima, Paraná, 86310-000, Brazil
Related Publications (20)
Contreras-Osorio F, Guzman-Guzman IP, Cerda-Vega E, Chirosa-Rios L, Ramirez-Campillo R, Campos-Jara C. Effects of the Type of Sports Practice on the Executive Functions of Schoolchildren. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 24;19(7):3886. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073886.
PMID: 35409571BACKGROUNDDavis CL, Tomporowski PD, McDowell JE, Austin BP, Miller PH, Yanasak NE, Allison JD, Naglieri JA. Exercise improves executive function and achievement and alters brain activation in overweight children: a randomized, controlled trial. Health Psychol. 2011 Jan;30(1):91-8. doi: 10.1037/a0021766.
PMID: 21299297BACKGROUNDde Greeff JW, Bosker RJ, Oosterlaan J, Visscher C, Hartman E. Effects of physical activity on executive functions, attention and academic performance in preadolescent children: a meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2018 May;21(5):501-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.595. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
PMID: 29054748BACKGROUNDDiamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
PMID: 23020641BACKGROUNDDiamond A, Lee K. Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):959-64. doi: 10.1126/science.1204529.
PMID: 21852486BACKGROUNDEvenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, Ondrak KS, McMurray RG. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci. 2008 Dec;26(14):1557-65. doi: 10.1080/02640410802334196.
PMID: 18949660BACKGROUNDFaul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
PMID: 17695343BACKGROUNDFuster JM. The prefrontal cortex--an update: time is of the essence. Neuron. 2001 May;30(2):319-33. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00285-9. No abstract available.
PMID: 11394996BACKGROUNDKessels RP, van Zandvoort MJ, Postma A, Kappelle LJ, de Haan EH. The Corsi Block-Tapping Task: standardization and normative data. Appl Neuropsychol. 2000;7(4):252-8. doi: 10.1207/S15324826AN0704_8.
PMID: 11296689BACKGROUNDLeger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J. The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci. 1988 Summer;6(2):93-101. doi: 10.1080/02640418808729800.
PMID: 3184250BACKGROUNDMacLeod CM. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163. No abstract available.
PMID: 2034749BACKGROUNDMoher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869. No abstract available.
PMID: 20332511BACKGROUNDMoreira JPA, Lopes MC, Miranda-Junior MV, Valentini NC, Lage GM, Albuquerque MR. Korperkoordinationstest Fur Kinder (KTK) for Brazilian Children and Adolescents: Factor Analysis, Invariance and Factor Score. Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 19;10:2524. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02524. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31803092BACKGROUNDNascimento WMD, Henrique NR, Marques MDS. KTK MOTOR TEST: REVIEW OF THE MAIN INFLUENCING VARIABLES. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2019 Jun 19;37(3):372-381. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2019;37;3;00013. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31241688BACKGROUNDSerrien DJ, Ivry RB, Swinnen SP. The missing link between action and cognition. Prog Neurobiol. 2007 Jun;82(2):95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.02.003. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
PMID: 17399884BACKGROUNDRigoli D, Piek JP, Kane R, Oosterlaan J. Motor coordination, working memory, and academic achievement in a normative adolescent sample: testing a mediation model. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 Nov;27(7):766-80. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acs061. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
PMID: 22777140BACKGROUNDRoebers CM, Kauer M. Motor and cognitive control in a normative sample of 7-year-olds. Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):175-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00755.x.
PMID: 19120425BACKGROUNDvan der Fels IM, Te Wierike SC, Hartman E, Elferink-Gemser MT, Smith J, Visscher C. The relationship between motor skills and cognitive skills in 4-16 year old typically developing children: A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Nov;18(6):697-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
PMID: 25311901BACKGROUNDVisier-Alfonso ME, Alvarez-Bueno C, Sanchez-Lopez M, Cavero-Redondo I, Martinez-Hortelano JA, Nieto-Lopez M, Martinez-Vizcaino V. Fitness and executive function as mediators between physical activity and academic achievement. J Sports Sci. 2021 Jul;39(14):1576-1584. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1886665. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
PMID: 33612080BACKGROUNDWassenberg R, Feron FJ, Kessels AG, Hendriksen JG, Kalff AC, Kroes M, Hurks PP, Beeren M, Jolles J, Vles JS. Relation between cognitive and motor performance in 5- to 6-year-old children: results from a large-scale cross-sectional study. Child Dev. 2005 Sep-Oct;76(5):1092-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00899.x.
PMID: 16150004BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The team of evaluators, teachers, and researchers who process the results will be completely independent. At all stages of the study (baseline until follow-up) the same outcome assessors will be recruited. None of the individuals, researchers, or evaluators involved will have knowledge as to group allocation. The professional responsible for the physical activities will be hired for this purpose and not belong to the project research team.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 3, 2024
First Posted
July 11, 2024
Study Start
September 2, 2024
Primary Completion
November 26, 2024
Study Completion
April 30, 2025
Last Updated
May 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share