NCT06496503

Brief Summary

Previous studies have indicated the relationship between physical activity and cognitive performance, with movement being a promising tool for improving executive functions, especially during childhood, which is a period of intense brain development. Thus, the objective of this project is to verify a school physical activity intervention on executive functions and the relationships with cardiorespiratory fitness and motor coordination. This will be a randomized control trial in accordance with the Consort - Statement, including 118 children of both sexes; 60 in an experimental group and 58 in a control group. The children will follow their usual school routines, including Physical Education classes as part of the curriculum. The experimental group will also participate in an intervention for 12 weeks after school. The intervention will include three weekly physical exercise sessions, lasting between 50 and 60 minutes. The sessions will consist of activities involving games, sports, dance with a focus on aspects of motor coordination and cardiorespiratory fitness, as well as cognitive games. Assessments will be carried out at baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention and after the follow-up period. The students will undergo measurements of body mass and height, as well as nutritional classification using the body mass index (BMI). Following this, a general motor coordination test (KTK), a cardiorespiratory aptitude test (Léger), and tests to assess executive functions (Stroop and Corsi Block) will be applied. Data distribution will be verified using the Shapiro-Wilk's test. The comparisons between different moments (baseline, after 12 weeks, and at follow-up) will be performed using repeated measures ANOVA. Sphericity will be checked by Mauchly's test followed by the Greenhouse- Geisser correction when necessary. To identify differences, the Bonferroni correction will be applied. The significance level will be set at 5% (P\<0.05).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 3, 2024

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 11, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 2, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 26, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 14, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

July 3, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 13, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

cognitive functionchildphysical activityschoolchildren

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Executive Functions

    The executive functions will be assessed pre-protocol, after 12 weeks, and 8 weeks after the end of the intervention (follow-up period). Executive functions will be investigated in the domains of working memory, using the Corsi Block Test (Corsi, 1972; Kessels et al., 2000), and inhibitory control, investigated by the Stroop Test (Stroop, 1935; MacLeod, 1991). For both tests there will be familiarization and reproducibility of measurements for both the children and evaluator. The evaluation will be carried out by a single evaluator blind to group allocation.

    Will be assessed pre-protocol, after 12 weeks, and 8 weeks after the end of the intervention.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Cardiorespiratory fitness

    Will be assessed pre-protocol, after 12 weeks, and 8 weeks after the end of the intervention.

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Motor Coordination

    Will be assessed pre-protocol, after 12 weeks, and 8 weeks after the end of the intervention.

Study Arms (2)

Experimental group

EXPERIMENTAL

The children included in the experimental group will undergo 12 weeks of physical activity sessions, and it is mandatory that all children complete a minimum of two weekly sessions of physical activity for 50-60 minutes. The activities will consist of content such as motor and cognitive games, sports, dance, and gymnastics. The intensity of the sessions will be checked using accelerometry. The physical activity protocol is adapted from a previously described protocol (CMSP, 2021; Klem, Filha, Monteiro, 2017; Mazzoccante et al.; 2020; Paiano, 2019; Rodrigues, 2018; Rosini et al., 2014). Acceptance of the exercise program in the pediatric population has been previously observed in a pilot study.

Behavioral: Physical activity Protocol

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

The children will follow their usual school routines, including Physical Education classes as part of the curriculum

Interventions

The children included in the experimental group will undergo 12 weeks of physical activity sessions, and it is mandatory that all children complete a minimum of two weekly sessions of physical activity for 50-60 minutes. The activities will consist of content such as motor and cognitive games, sports, dance, and gymnastics. The intensity of the sessions will be checked using accelerometry. The physical activity protocol is adapted from a previously described protocol (CMSP, 2021; Klem, Filha, Monteiro, 2017; Mazzoccante et al.; 2020; Paiano, 2019; Rodrigues, 2018; Rosini et al., 2014). Acceptance of the exercise program in the pediatric population has been previously observed in a pilot study.

Experimental group

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years - 11 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy
  • Neurotypical.

You may not qualify if:

  • Clinical or historical of cardiovascular disease
  • Hypertension
  • Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
  • Neurodiversity
  • Not be taking any drugs
  • Cannot participated in sports practices

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

School

Nova Fátima, Paraná, 86310-000, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (20)

  • Contreras-Osorio F, Guzman-Guzman IP, Cerda-Vega E, Chirosa-Rios L, Ramirez-Campillo R, Campos-Jara C. Effects of the Type of Sports Practice on the Executive Functions of Schoolchildren. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 24;19(7):3886. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073886.

    PMID: 35409571BACKGROUND
  • Davis CL, Tomporowski PD, McDowell JE, Austin BP, Miller PH, Yanasak NE, Allison JD, Naglieri JA. Exercise improves executive function and achievement and alters brain activation in overweight children: a randomized, controlled trial. Health Psychol. 2011 Jan;30(1):91-8. doi: 10.1037/a0021766.

    PMID: 21299297BACKGROUND
  • de Greeff JW, Bosker RJ, Oosterlaan J, Visscher C, Hartman E. Effects of physical activity on executive functions, attention and academic performance in preadolescent children: a meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2018 May;21(5):501-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.595. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

    PMID: 29054748BACKGROUND
  • Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. Epub 2012 Sep 27.

    PMID: 23020641BACKGROUND
  • Diamond A, Lee K. Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):959-64. doi: 10.1126/science.1204529.

    PMID: 21852486BACKGROUND
  • Evenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, Ondrak KS, McMurray RG. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci. 2008 Dec;26(14):1557-65. doi: 10.1080/02640410802334196.

    PMID: 18949660BACKGROUND
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.

    PMID: 17695343BACKGROUND
  • Fuster JM. The prefrontal cortex--an update: time is of the essence. Neuron. 2001 May;30(2):319-33. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00285-9. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11394996BACKGROUND
  • Kessels RP, van Zandvoort MJ, Postma A, Kappelle LJ, de Haan EH. The Corsi Block-Tapping Task: standardization and normative data. Appl Neuropsychol. 2000;7(4):252-8. doi: 10.1207/S15324826AN0704_8.

    PMID: 11296689BACKGROUND
  • Leger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J. The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci. 1988 Summer;6(2):93-101. doi: 10.1080/02640418808729800.

    PMID: 3184250BACKGROUND
  • MacLeod CM. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163. No abstract available.

    PMID: 2034749BACKGROUND
  • Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869. No abstract available.

    PMID: 20332511BACKGROUND
  • Moreira JPA, Lopes MC, Miranda-Junior MV, Valentini NC, Lage GM, Albuquerque MR. Korperkoordinationstest Fur Kinder (KTK) for Brazilian Children and Adolescents: Factor Analysis, Invariance and Factor Score. Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 19;10:2524. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02524. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31803092BACKGROUND
  • Nascimento WMD, Henrique NR, Marques MDS. KTK MOTOR TEST: REVIEW OF THE MAIN INFLUENCING VARIABLES. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2019 Jun 19;37(3):372-381. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2019;37;3;00013. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31241688BACKGROUND
  • Serrien DJ, Ivry RB, Swinnen SP. The missing link between action and cognition. Prog Neurobiol. 2007 Jun;82(2):95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.02.003. Epub 2007 Feb 23.

    PMID: 17399884BACKGROUND
  • Rigoli D, Piek JP, Kane R, Oosterlaan J. Motor coordination, working memory, and academic achievement in a normative adolescent sample: testing a mediation model. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 Nov;27(7):766-80. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acs061. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

    PMID: 22777140BACKGROUND
  • Roebers CM, Kauer M. Motor and cognitive control in a normative sample of 7-year-olds. Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):175-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00755.x.

    PMID: 19120425BACKGROUND
  • van der Fels IM, Te Wierike SC, Hartman E, Elferink-Gemser MT, Smith J, Visscher C. The relationship between motor skills and cognitive skills in 4-16 year old typically developing children: A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Nov;18(6):697-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 21.

    PMID: 25311901BACKGROUND
  • Visier-Alfonso ME, Alvarez-Bueno C, Sanchez-Lopez M, Cavero-Redondo I, Martinez-Hortelano JA, Nieto-Lopez M, Martinez-Vizcaino V. Fitness and executive function as mediators between physical activity and academic achievement. J Sports Sci. 2021 Jul;39(14):1576-1584. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1886665. Epub 2021 Feb 21.

    PMID: 33612080BACKGROUND
  • Wassenberg R, Feron FJ, Kessels AG, Hendriksen JG, Kalff AC, Kroes M, Hurks PP, Beeren M, Jolles J, Vles JS. Relation between cognitive and motor performance in 5- to 6-year-old children: results from a large-scale cross-sectional study. Child Dev. 2005 Sep-Oct;76(5):1092-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00899.x.

    PMID: 16150004BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Motor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The team of evaluators, teachers, and researchers who process the results will be completely independent. At all stages of the study (baseline until follow-up) the same outcome assessors will be recruited. None of the individuals, researchers, or evaluators involved will have knowledge as to group allocation. The professional responsible for the physical activities will be hired for this purpose and not belong to the project research team.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomization will be performed carefully following the recommendations proposed by the Cochrane Collaboration. The process will consist of two stages, firstly, the generation of numbers using a random number table, and secondly, allocation concealment, using opaque, sealed envelopes. After signing the consent form, an envelope will be opened for each child and they will be instructed as to which group they have been allocated, the experimental or control.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2024

First Posted

July 11, 2024

Study Start

September 2, 2024

Primary Completion

November 26, 2024

Study Completion

April 30, 2025

Last Updated

May 14, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations