Shock Wave Therapy as a Treatment Intervention for Frozen Shoulder
The Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy as a Treatment Intervention for Chronic Adhesive Capsulitis: a Mixed Methods Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
18
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Adhesive capsulitis (AC) is a debilitating condition that causes global restriction and pain at the glenohumeral joint. Physiotherapy treatment is often first line treatment management. Patients with failed conservative management are commonly referred to a specialist consultant for further treatment. Over the last 20 years, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has gained popularity as a treatment for various orthopaedic presentations, including chronic soft tissue conditions, being non-invasive, resulting in good outcomes with minimal side effects. There is a lack of evidence on the clinical effectiveness of ESWT for chronic AC following failed conservative treatments, with the available literature reporting positive outcomes, however, with heterogeneity in treatment protocols. This proposed study aims to explore the feasibility of a full trial of ESWT as a treatment for AC using a standardised treatment protocol, and clinical effects on outcomes of pain, function and shoulder joint range of movement in persons with chronic adhesive capsulitis. A Delphi study will first explore expert opinion for the optimum treatment protocol of ESWT as a treatment for chronic AC, followed by a mixed methods explanatory sequential study that includes a pilot trial with nested qualitative interviews. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, numerical pain rating scale, EuroQol-5D, and digital goniometer will be used to measure self-reported pain and function, pain, health-related quality of life, and shoulder joint range of movement, respectively. Quantitative data will be analysed by descriptive statistics. Qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured interviews. Interview data will be analysed using Braun and Clarke's inductive thematic analysis approach. The study will be conducted in an out-patient clinical setting in a community health hub facility, with patients recruited from an NHS Orthopaedics waitlist. Data collection is planned over a nine month period. This study is not affiliated with funding streams.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2026
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 11, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2027
January 27, 2026
January 1, 2026
7 months
March 11, 2024
January 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Recruitment and rejection rate
Estimate the proportion of patients screened who meet the eligibility criteria. This will be analysed with descriptive statistics using IBM SPSS Statistical Software. This will be displayed as a numerical value with standard deviation
18 months
Retention rate
Adherence and compliance to intervention and home exercise programme, follow-up and drops out. This will be analysed with descriptive statistics using IBM SPSS Statistical Software. This will be displayed as a numerical value with standard deviation
18 month
Secondary Outcomes (4)
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index
0, 6, and 12 weeks.
Numerical Pain Rating Scale
0, 6, and 12 weeks.
EuroQoL-5D-5L
0, 6, and 12 weeks.
Digital Goniometry
0, 6, and 12 weeks.
Study Arms (3)
Delphi Study
NO INTERVENTIONThe survey will be re-circulated a minimum of three, and maximum of four rounds, with an aim for a minimum of 20 participants and response rate of greater than 70 percent per round. The results will be collected and collated at each round to determine a consensus amongst shoulder specialists for further review. This information will be used to guide the treatment protocol in phase two.
Shock wave therapy quantitative data collection and analysis
EXPERIMENTALThis phase will involve the piloting of the shock wave therapy protocol determined by the results collected in phase one Delphi study Following participant consent, the research healthcare practitioner will provide patient reported outcome measure questionnaires for the participant to complete independently to measure baseline data. This will occur at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks following shock wave therapy treatment.
Qualitative semi-structured interviews
NO INTERVENTIONAll participants in phase 2 and those who declined participation in the quantitative study at the recruitment stage will be invited to take part in semi-structured qualitative interviews of a duration of 30 - 45 minutes. The interview protocol and questions will be developed based on the findings of the quantitative data analysis. Interviews will take place approximately 12 weeks from last ESWT treatment.
Interventions
Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and feasibility as treatment for adhesive capsulitis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants aged 18 years and older.
- Diagnosis of primary or secondary shoulder AC of a greater than three-month duration.
- Diagnosis of AC by an orthopaedic consultant or upper limb Advanced Practice Physiotherapist.
- Participants can attend an outpatient rural physiotherapy department to receive shockwave therapy intervention.
- They understand English.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who have bilateral shoulder pain, capsular tightness, calcific rotator cuff tendinitis, rotator cuff tear (atraumatic or traumatic), previous surgery on the affected shoulder, shoulder fracture, dislocation or subluxation, glenohumeral or acromioclavicular arthritis, malignancy, inflammatory disorders, neuromuscular disorders, presence of severe osteoporosis, pulmonary diseases, implanted pacemaker and pregnancy.
- They have conditions related to ESWT contraindications (e.g., pregnancy, pacemaker, metal work or joint replacement near the treatment site, blood clotting disorder, use of anti-coagulants, less than six weeks of receiving a steroid injection over treatment site, malignancy, local infection or open wounds, skeletal growth places, under 18 years old).
- Symptom duration less than 12 weeks.
- Absent or altered skin sensation.
- They are unable to give full informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (29)
Zreik NH, Malik RA, Charalambous CP. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder and diabetes: a meta-analysis of prevalence. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016 May 19;6(1):26-34. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2016.6.1.026. eCollection 2016 Jan-Mar.
PMID: 27331029BACKGROUNDLe HV, Lee SJ, Nazarian A, Rodriguez EK. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: review of pathophysiology and current clinical treatments. Shoulder Elbow. 2017 Apr;9(2):75-84. doi: 10.1177/1758573216676786. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
PMID: 28405218BACKGROUNDKraal T, Lubbers J, van den Bekerom MPJ, Alessie J, van Kooyk Y, Eygendaal D, Koorevaar RCT. The puzzling pathophysiology of frozen shoulders - a scoping review. J Exp Orthop. 2020 Nov 18;7(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40634-020-00307-w.
PMID: 33205235BACKGROUNDHand C, Clipsham K, Rees JL, Carr AJ. Long-term outcome of frozen shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;17(2):231-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.05.009. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
PMID: 17993282BACKGROUNDNICE (2017) Scenario: frozen shoulder. Available: https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/shoulder-pain/management/frozen-shoulder/ [Accessed: 04 November 2022].
BACKGROUNDDennis, L., Brealey, S., Rangan, A., Rookmoneea, M. and Watson, J. (2010) Managing idiopathic frozen shoulder: a survey of health professionals' current practice and research priorities. Shoulder and Elbow, 2 (4), pp. 294-300.
BACKGROUNDSmith G, D'Cruz JR, Rondeau B, Goldman J. General Anesthesia for Surgeons. 2023 Aug 5. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493199/
PMID: 29630251BACKGROUNDWang CJ. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders. J Orthop Surg Res. 2012 Mar 20;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-7-11.
PMID: 22433113BACKGROUNDTaylor J, Dunkerley S, Silver D, Redfern A, Talbot N, Sharpe I, Guyver P. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) for refractory Achilles tendinopathy: A prospective audit with 2-year follow up. Foot (Edinb). 2016 Mar;26:23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
PMID: 26802946BACKGROUNDLohrer H, Nauck T, Dorn-Lange NV, Scholl J, Vester JC. Comparison of radial versus focused extracorporeal shock waves in plantar fasciitis using functional measures. Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Jan;31(1):1-9. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0001.
PMID: 20067715BACKGROUNDWaugh CM, Morrissey D, Jones E, Riley GP, Langberg H, Screen HR. In vivo biological response to extracorporeal shockwave therapy in human tendinopathy. Eur Cell Mater. 2015 May 15;29:268-80; discussion 280. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v029a20.
PMID: 25978115BACKGROUNDChen CY, Hu CC, Weng PW, Huang YM, Chiang CJ, Chen CH, Tsuang YH, Yang RS, Sun JS, Cheng CK. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy improves short-term functional outcomes of shoulder adhesive capsulitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Dec;23(12):1843-1851. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.010.
PMID: 25441567BACKGROUNDEl Naggar TEDM, Maaty AIE, Mohamed AE. Effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock-wave therapy versus ultrasound-guided low-dose intra-articular steroid injection in improving shoulder pain, function, and range of motion in diabetic patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7):1300-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.005.
PMID: 32553435BACKGROUNDHameedi, I.A., Shadmehr, A., Malmir, K., Fereydounnia, S. and Shiravi, Z. (2022) Comparison of application of the radial vs. focused probes of extracorporeal shockwave therapy on pain, range of motion and function in patients with adhesive capsulitis. NeuroQuantology, 20 (6), pp. 2726.
BACKGROUNDHussein, A.Z. and Donatelli, R.A. (2016) The efficacy of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy in shoulder adhesive capsulitis: a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical study. European Journal of Physiotherapy, 18 (1), pp. 63-76.
BACKGROUNDLee S, Lee S, Jeong M, Oh H, Lee K. The effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain and range of motion in patients with adhesive capsulitis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Nov;29(11):1907-1909. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1907. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
PMID: 29200621BACKGROUNDSaldiran TC, Yazgan P, Akgol AC, Mutluay FK. Radial shock-wave therapy for frozen shoulder patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pilot trial comparing two different energy levels. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Jun;58(3):412-422. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07087-3. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
PMID: 35191654BACKGROUNDVahdatpour B, Taheri P, Zade AZ, Moradian S. Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in frozen shoulder. Int J Prev Med. 2014 Jul;5(7):875-81.
PMID: 25104999BACKGROUNDEubank BH, Mohtadi NG, Lafave MR, Wiley JP, Bois AJ, Boorman RS, Sheps DM. Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 May 20;16:56. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0165-8.
PMID: 27206853BACKGROUNDEldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA; PAFS consensus group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5239.
PMID: 27777223BACKGROUNDLewis M, Bromley K, Sutton CJ, McCray G, Myers HL, Lancaster GA. Determining sample size for progression criteria for pragmatic pilot RCTs: the hypothesis test strikes back! Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Feb 3;7(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00770-x.
PMID: 33536076BACKGROUNDJulious, S.A. (2005) Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 4 (4), pp. 287-291.
BACKGROUNDCreswell, J. and Plano Clark, V. (2011) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=none&isbn=9781412993654&uid=none
BACKGROUNDCreswell, J. (2014) Research design. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
BACKGROUNDEMS - Dolorclast (2021) Guided dolarclast therapy. Available: https://www.ems-dolorclast.com/sites/default/files/2021-11/FA-720_EN_Rev_B_GDT%20Sales%20Aid_Ed_07-2021_Light%20%281%29.pdf [Accessed: 09 February 2024].
BACKGROUNDPHE (2019) Musculoskeletal health: a 5 year strategic framework for prevention across the lifecourse. London: Public Health England (PHE). Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/810348/Musculoskeletal_Health_5_year_strategy.pdf [Accessed: 15 December 2022].
BACKGROUNDPHE (2017) Chronic pain in adults 2017: health survey for england. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/940858/Chronic_Pain_Report.pdf [Accessed: 04 November 2022].
BACKGROUNDOHID (2022) Musculoskeletal health: applying All Our Health. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/musculoskeletal-health-applying-all-our-health/musculoskeletal-health-applying-all-our-health#fn:1 [Accessed: 08 November 2022].
BACKGROUNDVersus Arthritis (2021) The state of musculoskeletal health 2021: arthritis and other musculoskeletal conditions in numbers. Available: https://www.versusarthritis.org/media/24653/state-of-msk-health2-2021.pdf [Accessed: 15 November 2022].
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Crystal Reno
University of Stirling
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professional Clinical Doctorate Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2024
First Posted
July 8, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2027
Last Updated
January 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share