Effectiveness of Action Observation and Motor Imagery Intervention Plus Exercise for Chronic Painful Shoulder in Primary Care
OPTIMIST
Effectiveness of an Exercise Program Combined With Action Observation and Motor Imagery in Patients With Chronic Shoulder Pain in Primary Care. A Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of an action observation program (OA) and motor imagery (MI) -integrated into routine physiotherapy practice- to reduce disability associated with chronic shoulder pain in primary care, after 8 weeks of intervention and with follow-ups at 3 and 6 months with blind evaluation of the response variable. Design: randomized controlled clinical trial. Population: Patients with chronic shoulder pain diagnosed and referred by their family doctors to the physiotherapy service will be included. Intervention: Group: experimental: MI+OA+ multicomponent exercises or control group: multicomponent exercises. 100 patients (50 per group) will be included. Variables: sociodemographic and clinical variables will be collected. Primary variable: Disability related to pain in the shoulder region; Secondary variables: Intensity of perceived pain, Shoulder Joint Range of Motion, Hand and shoulder strength, Fear of movement, Catastrophizing in the face of pain, Quality of life of patients, Global Perception of Change, and adherence to exercise. Statistical analysis: Descriptive. Main effectiveness analysis by intention to treat comparing the difference between groups in the average disability for the different intervention times. Multivariate analysis considers the influence of psychological variables on pain and on the therapeutic response. An analysis segmented by sex will be carried out, and the influence of psychological variables on pain and on the therapeutic response will be analyzed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2027
March 20, 2025
March 1, 2025
1.5 years
October 3, 2019
March 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Pain Intensity
Pain Intensity with Visual Analogue Scale (range: 0-10). Higher scores mean more intensity
Previous the intervention
Change in Pain Intensity
Pain Intensity with Visual Analogue Scale (range: 0-10). Higher scores mean more intensity
At 30 days from the begining finishing the intervention
Change in Pain Intensity
Pain Intensity with Visual Analogue Scale (range: 0-10). Higher scores mean more intensity
At the end of the usual care period of 4 weeks
Change in Pain Intensity
Pain Intensity with Visual Analogue Scale (range: 0-10). Higher scores mean more intensity
Up to 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Shoulder Disability: SPADI questionnaire
Previous the intervention
Change in Shoulder Disability
Up to 12 weeks
Health Related Quality of Live
Previous the intervention
Change in Health Related Quality of Live
Up to 12 weeks
Pain Catastrophizing
Previous the intervention
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Motor Imaginery
EXPERIMENTALPatients allocated in this arm will recieve a training on the first day after recruitment on a motor imaginery task and will be asked to do the task every day during 30 days until they start the usual care. Then after the physical therapy treatment with a pragmatic perspective will be meassured just inthe last session, after 1 month an.d after 3 moths of the treatment for the follow up
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients allocated in this arm will be meassured at the start, again after 30 days and at the end of the physical therapy usual care with a pragmatic perspective. Then will be meassured again after 1 and 3 months.
Interventions
A set of tasks done with the shoulder, first with an Action Observation perspective and then asked to perform this tasks with motor imaginery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- who have been diagnosed and referred by the family physician to physiotherapy units in primary care by a process of muscular origin in the shoulder region,
- who have not received physiotherapy treatment by the same process in the last 6 months.
You may not qualify if:
- suffer from systemic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, diagnosed neurological disease, lupus erythematosus, or cancer.
- History of shoulder surgery,
- patients with psychiatric pathologies or personality disorders;
- patients with severe mobility limitation compatible with the diagnosis of frozen shoulder, 5) patients diagnosed with type II diabetes,
- \) patients with little knowledge of Spanish language spoken or written and 7) reproduction of symptoms during active movements of the cervical spine or during palpation of the cervical or thoracic region.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ, Burdorf A, Verhagen AP, Miedema HS, Verhaar JA. Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol. 2004;33(2):73-81. doi: 10.1080/03009740310004667.
PMID: 15163107BACKGROUNDTinazzi M, Fiaschi A, Rosso T, Faccioli F, Grosslercher J, Aglioti SM. Neuroplastic changes related to pain occur at multiple levels of the human somatosensory system: A somatosensory-evoked potentials study in patients with cervical radicular pain. J Neurosci. 2000 Dec 15;20(24):9277-83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-24-09277.2000.
PMID: 11125006BACKGROUNDEaves DL, Riach M, Holmes PS, Wright DJ. Motor Imagery during Action Observation: A Brief Review of Evidence, Theory and Future Research Opportunities. Front Neurosci. 2016 Nov 21;10:514. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00514. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27917103BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor and Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2019
First Posted
October 8, 2019
Study Start
June 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Last Updated
March 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share