Irrisept vs Traditional Antibiotic Irrigation for Virgin Penile Prosthesis Placement
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess whether intraoperative irrigation with Irrisept is not inferior to irrigation with multiple antibiotics during placement of a first time inflatable penile prosthesis device.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Dec 2023
Typical duration for phase_3
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 4, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 5, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
ExpectedJanuary 5, 2026
December 1, 2025
2.5 years
June 28, 2024
December 31, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Infection Rate of Patients Receiving Traditional Antibiotic Irrigation vs Irrisept Only
All patients will be closely followed with appointments at regular intervals for the first year after surgery to monitor for infections as per usual care
1-2 years
Study Arms (2)
Traditional Antibiotic Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPreoperative antibiotic selection, method or preparation, draping, or technique;. the corpora, scrotum, and reservoir space will be irrigated with traditional antibiotics (rifampin, gentamycin, +/-fluconazole) immediately after the space is created in all cases. An additional scrotal irrigation with traditional antibiotics after all components are placed will be performed, as well. The patients will be followed and monitored for penile prosthesis infection as well as any other surgical complications for 1 year post operatively.
Irrisept only irrigation
EXPERIMENTALPreoperative antibiotic selection, method or preparation, draping, or technique;. the corpora, scrotum, and reservoir space will be irrigated with Irrisept only immediately after the space is created in all cases. An additional scrotal irrigation with Irrisept only after all components are placed will be performed, as well. The patients will be followed and monitored for penile prosthesis infection as well as any other surgical complications for 1 year post operatively.
Interventions
Irrisept is a self-contained jet lavage that contains chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) as a preservative to offer broad-spectrum activity against various microorganisms in the bottled solution
Aminoglycoside antibiotic irrigation
Antibacterial known to inhibit DNA-dependent RNA polymerase
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Irrimaxcorpcollaborator
- Rush University Medical Centerlead
- Urological Surgeons of Northern Californiacollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Urological Surgeons of Northern California
Mountain View, California, 94035, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Uropartners Surgery Center
Des Plaines, Illinois, 60018, United States
Related Publications (8)
Karpman E, Griggs R, Twomey C, Henry GD. Dipping Titan implants in Irrisept solution (0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate) and exposure to various aerobic, anaerobic, and fungal species. J Sex Med. 2023 Jun 28;20(7):1025-1031. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad055.
PMID: 37158448BACKGROUNDO'Donnell JA, Wu M, Cochrane NH, Belay E, Myntti MF, James GA, Ryan SP, Seyler TM. Efficacy of common antiseptic solutions against clinically relevant microorganisms in biofilm. Bone Joint J. 2021 May;103-B(5):908-915. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B5.BJJ-2020-1245.R2.
PMID: 33934664BACKGROUNDMarkel JF, Bou-Akl T, Dietz P, Afsari AM. The Effect of Different Irrigation Solutions on the Cytotoxicity and Recovery Potential of Human Osteoblast Cells In Vitro. Arthroplast Today. 2021 Jan 19;7:120-125. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.11.004. eCollection 2021 Feb.
PMID: 33521208BACKGROUNDO'Donnell JA, Wu M, Cochrane NH, Belay E, Myntti MF, James GA, Ryan SP, Seyler TM. Efficacy of Common Antiseptic Solutions Against Clinically Relevant Planktonic Microorganisms. Orthopedics. 2022 Mar-Apr;45(2):122-127. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20211227-05. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
PMID: 34978511BACKGROUNDSiddiqi A, Abdo ZE, Springer BD, Chen AF. Pursuit of the ideal antiseptic irrigation solution in the management of periprosthetic joint infections. J Bone Jt Infect. 2021 May 26;6(6):189-198. doi: 10.5194/jbji-6-189-2021. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34109103BACKGROUNDKia C, Cusano A, Messina J, Muench LN, Chadayammuri V, McCarthy MB, Umejiego E, Mazzocca AD. Effectiveness of topical adjuvants in reducing biofilm formation on orthopedic implants: an in vitro analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Sep;30(9):2177-2183. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.12.009. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
PMID: 33529773BACKGROUNDWosnitzer MS, Greenfield JM. Antibiotic patterns with inflatable penile prosthesis insertion. J Sex Med. 2011 May;8(5):1521-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02207.x. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
PMID: 21521487BACKGROUNDDesouky E, Tsambarlis P, Levine LA. Comparing 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate monotherapy to conventional antibiotic irrigation in de-novo penile prosthesis implantation: a two-center prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority study (preliminary results). Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Sep 30;13(9):1905-1911. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-278. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
PMID: 39434728DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edward Cherullo, MD
Rush University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laurence Levine, MD
Rush University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants will be aware of the two options, however will be randomly selected to receive only one of the two treatments. Investigators will be aware of the treatment as they are administering it
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2024
First Posted
July 5, 2024
Study Start
December 4, 2023
Primary Completion
May 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
January 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data requests can be submitted starting 9 months after article publication and the data will be made accessible for up to 24 months. Extensions will be considered on a case-by-case basis
- Access Criteria
- Access to trial IPD can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). For more information or to submit a request, please contact the noted research team
Data obtained through this study may be provided to qualified researchers with academic interest in IPP placement. Data or samples shared will be coded, with no PHI included. Approval of the request and execution of all applicable agreements (i.e. a material transfer agreement) are prerequisites to the sharing of data with the requesting party.