Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction I
Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel Design, Phase 3 Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Udenafil Tablets in Male Subjects With Erectile Dysfunction
1 other identifier
interventional
618
1 country
36
Brief Summary
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel design, Phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of udenafil, an orally administered, potent and selective inhibitor of PDE-5 versus placebo for the treatment of subjects with erectile dysfunction (ED).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Sep 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
36 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 22, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 22, 2011
CompletedDecember 22, 2011
December 1, 2011
6 months
October 19, 2009
July 12, 2011
December 21, 2011
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Erectile Function Domain Assessed by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Baseline to Final Visit/Week 12, mITT (Modified Intent-to-Treat), LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward)
Erectile Function domain: 0 (poor) - 5/(good) scoring scale for each of 6 questions (0-30/max/good). Over last month: How often were you able to get an erection during sex? When you had erections with stimulation, how often were your erections hard enough for penetration? When you attempted intercourse, how often were you able to penetrate your partner? How often were you able to maintain your erection after penetrating your partner? How difficult was it to maintain your erection to completion of intercourse? How do you rate your confidence that you can get \& keep your erection?
Baseline and Week 12
Change in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP), Question 2, Change From Baseline to Overall Study/Weeks 1-12, mITT
Question 2 SEP: Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina? yes/no response; no scale. Measured percent yes responses during baseline and compared with percent yes responses during overall treatment period.
Baseline and Weeks 1 - 12
Change in SEP Question 3, Change From Baseline to Overall Study/Weeks 1-12, mITT
Question 3 SEP: Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful completion of intercourse? yes/no response; no scale. Measured percent yes responses during baseline and compared with percent yes responses during overall treatment period.
Baseline and Weeks 1 - 12
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Global Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ), While Using the Study Medication, Did You Feel That Your Erections Improved? (Yes Responders), Week 12/Final Visit, mITT Population
Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12/Final Visit in Mean Patient Self-Assessment of Erection (PSAE), mITT Population
Baseline to Week 12
Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Derived Score, Subject Version, Week 12/ Final Visit, LOCF, mITT Population
Baseline to Week 12
Change in Satisfaction of Intercourse Domain Score Assessed by IIEF, Baseline to Week 12/Final Visit, mITT, LOCF
Baseline and Week 12
Change in Orgasmic Function Domain Score Assessed by IIEF, Baseline to Week 12/Final Visit, mITT, LOCF
Baseline and Week 12
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORUdenafil 50 mg
EXPERIMENTALUdenafil 100 mg
EXPERIMENTALUdenafil 150 mg
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male, at least 19 years of age
- Stable monogamous relationship for at least 6 months with a consenting female partner who is at least 19 years of age, vaginal intercourse is a required study activity
- History of ED (clinically defined as the inability to attain and maintain an erection of the penis sufficient to permit satisfactory sexual intercourse) of at least 3 months duration
- Partner is not pregnant or lactating
You may not qualify if:
- History of new-onset symptomatic coronary artery disease within the last 3 months or a history of myocardial infarction or cardiac surgical procedure within six months
- Cardiac arrhythmias requiring antiarrhythmic treatment
- Symptomatic congestive heart failure
- Taking nitrate medication in any form
- Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 13%)
- Hypersensitivity to phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors such as Viagra®, Cialis® or Levitra®
- Previously failed to respond to PDE-5 inhibitors such as Viagra®, Cialis® or Levitra®
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Warner Chilcottlead
Study Sites (36)
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Homewood, Alabama, 35209, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Mesa, Arizona, 85213, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85023, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85741, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Laguna Hills, California, 92653, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Newport Beach, California, 92660, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92103, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Torrance, California, 90505, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado, 80211, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Middlebury, Connecticut, 06762, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
New Britain, Connecticut, 06052, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33761, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33143, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Ocala, Florida, 34474, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Columbus, Georgia, 31904, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Melrose Park, Illinois, 60160, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Jeffersonville, Indiana, 47130, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Garden City, New York, 11530, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10016, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Rochester, New York, 14609, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28226, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Concord, North Carolina, 28025, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45212, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, 19004, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Spokane, Washington, 99204, United States
Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
Spokane, Washington, 99208, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Grexan Wulff, Manager Regulatory Affairs
- Organization
- Warner Chilcott
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Herman Ellman, MD
Warner Chilcott
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2009
First Posted
December 22, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
March 1, 2010
Study Completion
March 1, 2010
Last Updated
December 22, 2011
Results First Posted
December 22, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-12