Effect of Modeling Resin on Anterior Direct Composite Veneer

NCT06485024 | Not Yet Recruiting

• 1 other identifier: MR in anterior
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 25
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

the study will be conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of direct Nanohybrid resin composite veneer restorations applied with or without modeling resin

Conditions

Dental Wear; Dental Decay

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• comparison of Color stability with and without the intervention

  by using Spectrophotometer to measure the color considering the intervention

  baseline and after one year

Secondary Outcomes (8)

• comparing the effect of the intervention on color match

  baseline and after one year

• comparing the effect of the intervention on anatomical form

  baseline and after one year

• comparing the effect of the intervention on surface texture

  baseline and after one year

• comparing the effect of the intervention on marginal adaptation

  baseline and after one year

• comparing the effect of the intervention on marginal discoloration

  baseline and after one year

Study Arms (2)

intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

the use of Modeling resin as the last layer applied to the NanoHybrid composite direct veneer

Device: Modeling Resin

comparator

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

the regular application of the NanoHybrid composite as a direct anterior veneer restoration

Device: Modeling Resin

Interventions

Modeling Resin DEVICE

it is the application of Modeling liquid to make easier manipulation and sculpting the composite veneer and reflect on its physical properties and clinical performance

comparator; intervention

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 45 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Adults (18-45Ys) with anterior tooth defects indicated for direct composite veneer restoration.
• Males or females.
• Community-dwelling
• Have all his/her anterior teeth with sufficient enamel structure
• With ≥ 1 anterior tooth defect
• Have sufficient cognitive ability to understand consent procedures
• Anterior tooth defect indicated for direct composite veneer
• Vital upper or lower anterior teeth with no signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.
• Mobility grade: no clinical mobility
• Plaque index ≤ 2

You may not qualify if:

• Patients younger than 18 or older than 45 years old • Disabilities.
• Systemic diseases or severe medically compromised.
• Lack of compliance.
• Evidence of severe bruxism, clenching or temporomandibular joint disorders.
• Cognitive impairment
• Periapical pathosis or signs of pulpal pathology.
• Malocclusion
• Possible prosthodontic restoration within 1 year.
• Non-vital tooth.
• Endodontically treated tooth.
• Severe periodontal affection or tooth indicated for extraction.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Cairo University: lead

Related Publications (16)

• Munchow EA, Sedrez-Porto JA, Piva E, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS. Use of dental adhesives as modeler liquid of resin composites. Dent Mater. 2016 Apr;32(4):570-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

  PMID: 26850844 BACKGROUND

• Stefanski S, van Dijken JW. Clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite with and without an intermediary layer of flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Feb;16(1):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0485-8. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

  PMID: 21104100 BACKGROUND

• Rosentritt M, Esch J, Behr M, Leibrock A, Handel G. In vivo color stability of resin composite veneers and acrylic resin teeth in removable partial dentures. Quintessence Int. 1998 Aug;29(8):517-22.

  PMID: 9807133 RESULT

• Al-Asmar AA, Ha Sabrah A, Abd-Raheam IM, Ismail NH, Oweis YG. Clinical evaluation of reasons for replacement of amalgam vs composite posterior restorations. Saudi Dent J. 2023 Mar;35(3):275-281. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Mar 4.

  PMID: 37091274 RESULT

• Bhadra D, Shah NC, Kishan KV, Dedania MS. An in vitro comparative evaluation of commonly consumed catechu and catechu with lime on surface roughness and color stability of the conventional nano-hybrid composite. J Conserv Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;22(1):87-91. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_181_18.

  PMID: 30820089 RESULT

• Crins LAMJ, Opdam NJM, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Sterenborg BAMM, Huysmans MCDNJM, Loomans BAC. Randomized controlled trial on the performance of direct and indirect composite restorations in patients with severe tooth wear. Dent Mater. 2021 Nov;37(11):1645-1654. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.018. Epub 2021 Sep 6.

  PMID: 34497023 RESULT

• Demarco FF, Collares K, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing? Braz Oral Res. 2017 Aug 28;31(suppl 1):e56. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0056.

  PMID: 28902236 RESULT

• Cortopassi LS, Shimokawa CAK, Willers AE, Sobral MAP. Surface roughness and color stability of surface sealants and adhesive systems applied over a resin-based composite. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Jan;32(1):64-72. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12548. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

  PMID: 31737981 RESULT

• Malekipour MR, Sharafi A, Kazemi S, Khazaei S, Shirani F. Comparison of color stability of a composite resin in different color media. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Jul;9(4):441-6.

  PMID: 23162586 RESULT

• Gianordoli-Neto R, Padovani GC, Mondelli J, de Lima Navarro MF, Mendonca JS, Santiago SL. Two-year clinical evaluation of resin composite in posterior teeth: A randomized controlled study. J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(4):306-10. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.186446.

  PMID: 27563176 RESULT

• Heintze SD, Rousson V, Hickel R. Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations--a meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2015 May;31(5):481-95. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Mar 13.

  PMID: 25773188 RESULT

• Maia TS, Lima TD, Ramos VM, Faria-E-Silva AL, Menezes MS. Effect of modeling liquids on resin composite roughness and color parameters after staining and toothbrushing. Braz Oral Res. 2023 Mar 31;37:e024. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0024. eCollection 2023.

  PMID: 37018806 RESULT

• Paolone G, Mazzitelli C, Josic U, Scotti N, Gherlone E, Cantatore G, Breschi L. Modeling Liquids and Resin-Based Dental Composite Materials-A Scoping Review. Materials (Basel). 2022 May 24;15(11):3759. doi: 10.3390/ma15113759.

  PMID: 35683057 RESULT

• Pizzolotto L, Moraes RR. Resin Composites in Posterior Teeth: Clinical Performance and Direct Restorative Techniques. Dent J (Basel). 2022 Nov 27;10(12):222. doi: 10.3390/dj10120222.

  PMID: 36547038 RESULT

• Cetin AR, Unlu N. One-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. Dent Mater J. 2009 Sep;28(5):620-6. doi: 10.4012/dmj.28.620.

  PMID: 19822994 RESULT

• Sedrez-Porto JA, Munchow EA, Brondani LP, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Effects of modeling liquid/resin and polishing on the color change of resin composite. Braz Oral Res. 2016 Aug 18;30(1):S1806-83242016000100275. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0088.

  PMID: 27556554 RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tooth Wear; Dental Caries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth Diseases; Stomatognathic Diseases; Tooth Demineralization

Central Study Contacts

Sarah A. Azzazy, postgrad

CONTACT

+02 10 18 300 996; sarah.azzazy@dentistry.cu.edu.eg

Asmaa A. Yassen, professor

CONTACT

+02 100 191 2610; Asmaa.Yassen@dentistry.cu.edu.eg

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: DOUBLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: PREVENTION
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Master's student

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: June 26, 2024
• First Posted: July 3, 2024
• Study Start: July 1, 2024
• Primary Completion: July 1, 2025
• Study Completion: August 1, 2025
• Last Updated: July 3, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06