NCT06484582

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to examine the musculoskeletal disorders seen in automotive industry workers.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
500

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 26, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 3, 2024

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 19, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 15, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 22, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

June 26, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 19, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Work Productivity & Activity Impairment Questionnaire - General Health

    It is a tool developed to assess how health problems affect working life and daily activities in the general population. It measures the impact of health and symptom severity based on work productivity and leave time assessments and consists of 6 questions. These are; employment status, working hours, hours missed due to health problems, hours missed due to other reasons and the last two questions are the hours actually worked. It is scored from 0 to 10 points. The highest is 70, the lowest is 0. Higher scores indicate prolonged sick leave or impairment and reduced productivity.

    1 week

  • Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Survey

    The scale includes a total of 24 questions. 19 of these questions are self-evaluation questions, and 5 of them are answered by the individual's spouse or a roommate. These 5 questions are used for clinical information only and are not included in the scoring. The scale questions that determine sleep quality include various factors related to sleep quality. These questions are to determine sleep duration, sleep latency, and the frequency and severity of specific sleep-related problems; 18 items were grouped as 7 component scores. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. A high total score indicates poor sleep quality. The scale does not indicate the presence of sleep disorders or the prevalence of sleep disorders. However, it is stated that a total score of 5 and above indicates poor sleep quality.

    1 week

  • Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire

    It was developed to evaluate functional status and symptoms by focusing on physical function in upper extremity injuries. According to the results of the survey; a result from 0-100 is obtained from each part; 0-no apology 100-maximum apology.

    1 week

  • Rapid Upper Limb Assessment

    It is an ergonomics risk assessment method that quickly analyzes the employee's upper extremity from an ergonomic perspective. It evaluates upper extremity movements in 14 separate steps. 8 of these steps are scored for arm and hand position, and 6 for neck and trunk position, according to the table. The minimum Rapid Upper Limb Assessment Score = 1, and the maximum Rapid Upper Limb Assessment Score = 7. A high score means high risk.

    1 week

  • Nordic Extended Musculoskeletal Questionnaire

    It is one of the questionnaires used to evaluate the severity and impact of musculoskeletal symptoms. In the survey, the frequency and severity of pain in the 'Neck, Shoulder, Upper Back, Elbow, Hand-wrist, Kala, Knee, Foot-ankle' areas of the body are evaluated in the last 12 months.It is a selection scale rather than a rating.

    1 week

  • The McGill Pain Questionnaire

    McGill pain questionnaire-short form is used to evaluate patients' pain in terms of feeling and sensory. Pain level is defined with 15 words consisting of 11 sensory and 4 affective words. From these descriptive words, the patient should choose an answer that is compatible with him/her as "no (0)", "mild (1)", "moderate (2)", "severe (3)". In addition, the pain felt during the survey is measured with the Visual analog scale , and the total pain intensity of the pain is measured with a 6-point Likert scale. Pain is defined as "absent (0)" and "unbearable (5)" on the Likert scale. In total, pain scores between 0-45 (no pain=0, severe pain=45).

    1 week

Interventions

workersOTHER

This study will be conducted as a face-to-face survey. Surveys will be created with Google Forms and will be filled out by the physiotherapist according to the participant's response.

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 60 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

auto industry workers

You may qualify if:

  • Being between the ages of 25-60
  • Not having any psychological or neurological disorders
  • Being able to communicate in Turkish (written, verbal)
  • Being able to communicate cognitively adequately
  • Working full-time
  • Being employed in an automotive industry for at least 5 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Being under 18 or over 60
  • Working part-time
  • Being employed in the same business for less than 5 years

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Uskudar University

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Eakin JM. Leaving it up to the workers: sociological perspective on the management of health and safety in small workplaces. Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(4):689-704. doi: 10.2190/DNV0-57VV-FJ7K-8KU5.

    PMID: 1399176BACKGROUND
  • Govaerts R, Tassignon B, Ghillebert J, Serrien B, De Bock S, Ampe T, El Makrini I, Vanderborght B, Meeusen R, De Pauw K. Prevalence and incidence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in secondary industries of 21st century Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Aug 31;22(1):751. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04615-9.

    PMID: 34465326BACKGROUND
  • d'Errico A, Cardano M, Landriscina T, Marinacci C, Pasian S, Petrelli A, Costa G. Workplace stress and prescription of antidepressant medications: a prospective study on a sample of Italian workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Apr;84(4):413-24. doi: 10.1007/s00420-010-0586-3. Epub 2010 Oct 16.

    PMID: 20953623BACKGROUND
  • da Costa BR, Vieira ER. Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. Am J Ind Med. 2010 Mar;53(3):285-323. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20750.

    PMID: 19753591BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Workforce

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Organization and AdministrationHealth Services Administration

Study Officials

  • Sude Asya ALŞAN

    Uskudar University

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Asst. Prof. Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2024

First Posted

July 3, 2024

Study Start

July 19, 2024

Primary Completion

October 15, 2024

Study Completion

October 15, 2024

Last Updated

July 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations