NCT06476938

Brief Summary

This is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of an electronic health decision support tool called Gene PilotLX to increase informed decision making regarding hereditary risk information from tumor genomic profiling (TGP) test among Latinx cancer patients recruited at four cancer centers.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
232

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable cancer

Timeline
20mo left

Started May 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress38%
May 2025Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 17, 2024

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 27, 2024

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 30, 2025

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2027

Expected
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

July 3, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

June 17, 2024

Last Update Submit

June 30, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

eHealth decision toolHispanic/LatinoTumor Genomic Profiling

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Preparation for Decision Making (PrepDM) Scale

    PrepDM Scale measures preparedness of patient to make a decision (10 items) regarding a hereditary risk from tumor genomic profiling (TGP) on a 1 "not at all" to 5 "a great deal" scale. Higher means indicated higher perceived level of preparation for decision making.

    Post-test (can occur on same day as baseline, day 1) and 1-3 month follow-up

  • Decisional Conflict: Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) scale

    16- item measure to determine patient clarity on the risks and benefits of tumor genomic profiling (TGP) testing and hereditary risk information from TGP. Items are given a score value of: 0= 'strongly agree'; 2= 'neither agree nor disagree'; 3= 'disagree'; 4= 'strongly disagree' TOTAL SCORE 16 items are: a) summed; b) divided by 16; and c) multiplied by 25. Scores range from 0 \[no decisional conflict\] to 100 \[extremely high decisional conflict\]

    Post-test (can occur on same day as baseline, day 1) and 1-3 month follow-up

  • Communication of preferences to doctor related to pursuing hereditary cancer risk information from TGP

    This is a single dichotomous item created for the study: 'Have you talked with a doctor about secondary hereditary results from TGP testing'?('Yes', 'No'). If 'Yes' is selected, 7 different topics for discussion with doctor are listed, including 'other' as open question.

    1-3 month follow up

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Communication of preferences with family related to pursuing hereditary cancer risk information from TGP

    1-3 month follow up

  • Perception of Tumor Genomic Profiling (TGP)

    Baseline (day1) and 1-3 month follow up

Study Arms (2)

Gene PilotLX

EXPERIMENTAL

Gene PilotLX is an eHealth decision support tool that is designed to empower Latinx cancer patients to decide their preferences for learning about secondary genetic information, communicate those preferences to their doctors, and provide the opportunity to discuss information with their families or others to feel they have made an informed decision. The tool will be available in both English and Spanish. It is web-based, has a voice-over, and is easy to navigate, with simple forward and backward buttons. Each section includes a different aspect of tumor genomic profiling, from basic information about what the test is and what the pros and cons are of the test, to culturally specific potential barriers or benefits to learning hereditary results. At the end, the tool provides tailored potential questions for a doctor that users can choose, which are summarized in a "score card" that can be printed or emailed.

Other: Gene PilotLX

TGP brochure

NO INTERVENTION

Participants in the control arm will be provided a brochure about tumor genomic profiling (TGP) secondary hereditary risks, and what patients can decide about getting that information, including the pros and cons. It is literacy appropriate, incorporates visuals, and will also be offered in both English and Spanish.

Interventions

eHealth decision making tool regarding tumor genomic profiling

Gene PilotLX

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Self-identified Latinx patients who:
  • diagnosed with solid tumor cancers
  • speak/read English or Spanish;
  • can provide informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with hematologic/liquid cancers (leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, etc.)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper

Camden, New Jersey, 08103, United States

NOT YET RECRUITING

Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center

New York, New York, 10032, United States

NOT YET RECRUITING

Fox Chase Cancer Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111, United States

RECRUITING

Temple University Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19122, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (9)

  • Catenacci DV, Amico AL, Nielsen SM, Geynisman DM, Rambo B, Carey GB, Gulden C, Fackenthal J, Marsh RD, Kindler HL, Olopade OI. Tumor genome analysis includes germline genome: are we ready for surprises? Int J Cancer. 2015 Apr 1;136(7):1559-67. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29128. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

    PMID: 25123297BACKGROUND
  • Schrader KA, Cheng DT, Joseph V, Prasad M, Walsh M, Zehir A, Ni A, Thomas T, Benayed R, Ashraf A, Lincoln A, Arcila M, Stadler Z, Solit D, Hyman DM, Zhang L, Klimstra D, Ladanyi M, Offit K, Berger M, Robson M. Germline Variants in Targeted Tumor Sequencing Using Matched Normal DNA. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jan;2(1):104-11. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5208. Erratum In: JAMA Oncol. 2016 Feb;2(2):279. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.6541.. Hyman, David [corrected to Hyman, David M].

    PMID: 26556299BACKGROUND
  • Cruz-Correa M, Perez-Mayoral J, Dutil J, Echenique M, Mosquera R, Rivera-Roman K, Umpierre S, Rodriguez-Quilichini S, Gonzalez-Pons M, Olivera MI, Pardo S; Puerto Rico Clinical Cancer Genetics Consortia. Clinical Cancer Genetics Disparities among Latinos. J Genet Couns. 2017 Jun;26(3):379-386. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-0051-x. Epub 2016 Dec 12.

    PMID: 27957667BACKGROUND
  • Lynce F, Graves KD, Jandorf L, Ricker C, Castro E, Moreno L, Augusto B, Fejerman L, Vadaparampil ST. Genomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Among Latinas. Cancer Control. 2016 Oct;23(4):359-372. doi: 10.1177/107327481602300407.

    PMID: 27842325BACKGROUND
  • Pagan JA, Su D, Li L, Armstrong K, Asch DA. Racial and ethnic disparities in awareness of genetic testing for cancer risk. Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6):524-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.021.

    PMID: 19944919BACKGROUND
  • Canedo JR, Miller ST, Myers HF, Sanderson M. Racial and ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing in the US: Systematic review. J Genet Couns. 2019 Jun;28(3):587-601. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1078. Epub 2019 Jan 21.

    PMID: 30663831BACKGROUND
  • Furness K, Sarkies MN, Huggins CE, Croagh D, Haines TP. Impact of the Method of Delivering Electronic Health Behavior Change Interventions in Survivors of Cancer on Engagement, Health Behaviors, and Health Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 23;22(6):e16112. doi: 10.2196/16112.

    PMID: 32574147BACKGROUND
  • Wagner LI, Tooze JA, Hall DL, Levine BJ, Beaumont J, Duffecy J, Victorson D, Gradishar W, Leach J, Saphner T, Sturtz K, Smith ML, Penedo F, Mohr DC, Cella D. Targeted eHealth Intervention to Reduce Breast Cancer Survivors' Fear of Recurrence: Results From the FoRtitude Randomized Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 2;113(11):1495-1505. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab100.

    PMID: 34057469BACKGROUND
  • Wilson J, Heinsch M, Betts D, Booth D, Kay-Lambkin F. Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 17;21(1):1556. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11623-w.

    PMID: 34399716BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Study Officials

  • Michael J Hall, MD,MS

    Fox Chase Cancer Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Sarah B Bass, PhD, MPH

    Temple University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Tracey A Revenson, PhD

    Hunter College of City University of New York

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Michael J Hall, MD, MS

CONTACT

Sarah B Bass, PhD, MPH

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2024

First Posted

June 27, 2024

Study Start

May 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

July 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations