Testing Gene PilotLX With Latinx Cancer Patients
Testing the Efficacy of an eHealth Decision Support Tool to Help Latinx Cancer Patients Make Informed Decisions About Tumor Genomic Testing
2 other identifiers
interventional
232
1 country
4
Brief Summary
This is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of an electronic health decision support tool called Gene PilotLX to increase informed decision making regarding hereditary risk information from tumor genomic profiling (TGP) test among Latinx cancer patients recruited at four cancer centers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable cancer
Started May 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable cancer
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
July 3, 2025
June 1, 2025
1.9 years
June 17, 2024
June 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Preparation for Decision Making (PrepDM) Scale
PrepDM Scale measures preparedness of patient to make a decision (10 items) regarding a hereditary risk from tumor genomic profiling (TGP) on a 1 "not at all" to 5 "a great deal" scale. Higher means indicated higher perceived level of preparation for decision making.
Post-test (can occur on same day as baseline, day 1) and 1-3 month follow-up
Decisional Conflict: Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) scale
16- item measure to determine patient clarity on the risks and benefits of tumor genomic profiling (TGP) testing and hereditary risk information from TGP. Items are given a score value of: 0= 'strongly agree'; 2= 'neither agree nor disagree'; 3= 'disagree'; 4= 'strongly disagree' TOTAL SCORE 16 items are: a) summed; b) divided by 16; and c) multiplied by 25. Scores range from 0 \[no decisional conflict\] to 100 \[extremely high decisional conflict\]
Post-test (can occur on same day as baseline, day 1) and 1-3 month follow-up
Communication of preferences to doctor related to pursuing hereditary cancer risk information from TGP
This is a single dichotomous item created for the study: 'Have you talked with a doctor about secondary hereditary results from TGP testing'?('Yes', 'No'). If 'Yes' is selected, 7 different topics for discussion with doctor are listed, including 'other' as open question.
1-3 month follow up
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Communication of preferences with family related to pursuing hereditary cancer risk information from TGP
1-3 month follow up
Perception of Tumor Genomic Profiling (TGP)
Baseline (day1) and 1-3 month follow up
Study Arms (2)
Gene PilotLX
EXPERIMENTALGene PilotLX is an eHealth decision support tool that is designed to empower Latinx cancer patients to decide their preferences for learning about secondary genetic information, communicate those preferences to their doctors, and provide the opportunity to discuss information with their families or others to feel they have made an informed decision. The tool will be available in both English and Spanish. It is web-based, has a voice-over, and is easy to navigate, with simple forward and backward buttons. Each section includes a different aspect of tumor genomic profiling, from basic information about what the test is and what the pros and cons are of the test, to culturally specific potential barriers or benefits to learning hereditary results. At the end, the tool provides tailored potential questions for a doctor that users can choose, which are summarized in a "score card" that can be printed or emailed.
TGP brochure
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in the control arm will be provided a brochure about tumor genomic profiling (TGP) secondary hereditary risks, and what patients can decide about getting that information, including the pros and cons. It is literacy appropriate, incorporates visuals, and will also be offered in both English and Spanish.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Self-identified Latinx patients who:
- diagnosed with solid tumor cancers
- speak/read English or Spanish;
- can provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with hematologic/liquid cancers (leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, etc.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fox Chase Cancer Centerlead
- Temple Universitycollaborator
- MD Anderson Cancer Center at Coopercollaborator
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Centercollaborator
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)collaborator
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (4)
MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper
Camden, New Jersey, 08103, United States
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111, United States
Temple University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19122, United States
Related Publications (9)
Catenacci DV, Amico AL, Nielsen SM, Geynisman DM, Rambo B, Carey GB, Gulden C, Fackenthal J, Marsh RD, Kindler HL, Olopade OI. Tumor genome analysis includes germline genome: are we ready for surprises? Int J Cancer. 2015 Apr 1;136(7):1559-67. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29128. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
PMID: 25123297BACKGROUNDSchrader KA, Cheng DT, Joseph V, Prasad M, Walsh M, Zehir A, Ni A, Thomas T, Benayed R, Ashraf A, Lincoln A, Arcila M, Stadler Z, Solit D, Hyman DM, Zhang L, Klimstra D, Ladanyi M, Offit K, Berger M, Robson M. Germline Variants in Targeted Tumor Sequencing Using Matched Normal DNA. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jan;2(1):104-11. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5208. Erratum In: JAMA Oncol. 2016 Feb;2(2):279. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.6541.. Hyman, David [corrected to Hyman, David M].
PMID: 26556299BACKGROUNDCruz-Correa M, Perez-Mayoral J, Dutil J, Echenique M, Mosquera R, Rivera-Roman K, Umpierre S, Rodriguez-Quilichini S, Gonzalez-Pons M, Olivera MI, Pardo S; Puerto Rico Clinical Cancer Genetics Consortia. Clinical Cancer Genetics Disparities among Latinos. J Genet Couns. 2017 Jun;26(3):379-386. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-0051-x. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
PMID: 27957667BACKGROUNDLynce F, Graves KD, Jandorf L, Ricker C, Castro E, Moreno L, Augusto B, Fejerman L, Vadaparampil ST. Genomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Among Latinas. Cancer Control. 2016 Oct;23(4):359-372. doi: 10.1177/107327481602300407.
PMID: 27842325BACKGROUNDPagan JA, Su D, Li L, Armstrong K, Asch DA. Racial and ethnic disparities in awareness of genetic testing for cancer risk. Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6):524-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.021.
PMID: 19944919BACKGROUNDCanedo JR, Miller ST, Myers HF, Sanderson M. Racial and ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing in the US: Systematic review. J Genet Couns. 2019 Jun;28(3):587-601. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1078. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
PMID: 30663831BACKGROUNDFurness K, Sarkies MN, Huggins CE, Croagh D, Haines TP. Impact of the Method of Delivering Electronic Health Behavior Change Interventions in Survivors of Cancer on Engagement, Health Behaviors, and Health Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 23;22(6):e16112. doi: 10.2196/16112.
PMID: 32574147BACKGROUNDWagner LI, Tooze JA, Hall DL, Levine BJ, Beaumont J, Duffecy J, Victorson D, Gradishar W, Leach J, Saphner T, Sturtz K, Smith ML, Penedo F, Mohr DC, Cella D. Targeted eHealth Intervention to Reduce Breast Cancer Survivors' Fear of Recurrence: Results From the FoRtitude Randomized Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 2;113(11):1495-1505. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab100.
PMID: 34057469BACKGROUNDWilson J, Heinsch M, Betts D, Booth D, Kay-Lambkin F. Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 17;21(1):1556. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11623-w.
PMID: 34399716BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael J Hall, MD,MS
Fox Chase Cancer Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sarah B Bass, PhD, MPH
Temple University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tracey A Revenson, PhD
Hunter College of City University of New York
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2024
First Posted
June 27, 2024
Study Start
May 30, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
July 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share