Risk Assessment of Proximal Contact Loss Between Implant-supported Prostheses and Adjacent Teeth.

NCT06475313 | Not Yet Recruiting

• 1 other identifier: KY20240613-05
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 100
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

In this study, we collected and analysed the review results of 100 patients over 18 years of age who received implant fixed restorations in the Department of Stomatology of the First Hospital of Nanjing, China. The aim was to investigate the incidence of loss of contact between implant restorations and adjacent teeth and its influencing factors. Our findings may provide better insights for treatment planning and prevention of PCL.

Conditions

Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis

Keywords

food impaction; proximal contact loss; Implant supported prosthesis; Dentition defect; risk factors

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• the proximal contact surface was adjusted by a dental floss (Reach waxed dental floss from Johnson & Johnson, standard thickness)

  The degree of proximal contact loss(PCL) was evaluated with a dental floss passing through the contact areas and classified as: (a) tight: sufficient resistance to the passage of the floss; (b) loose: insufficient resistance to the passage of the floss; and (c) open: contact: no resistance to the passage of the floss. The presence of an open or loose contact was classified as PCL.

  Patients with implant-supported prostheses reviewed 3 months after delivery were eligible for inclusion in this study.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

• oral panoramic radiograph

  Patients with implant-supported prostheses reviewed 3 months after delivery were eligible for inclusion in this study.

• Bausch Arti-Fol R metallic Shimstock-Film

  Patients with implant-supported prostheses reviewed 3 months after delivery were eligible for inclusion in this study.

Interventions

plaque index assessment, periodontal probing, Bleeding on probing (BOP), Prosthetic adjacency check, initial occlusal contact, maximum occlusal contact, and filling of the cusps. BEHAVIORAL

oral panoramic radiograph

Also known as: Radiation

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

One hundred consecutive patients, who had received either implant-supported fixed partial denture (FPD) or implant-supported single crown (SC) in the posterior region and were under regular review, were recruited.

You may qualify if:

• (1) Patients over the age of 18, can fully understand the nature of the proposed and be able to sign a consent form.
• (2) patients who underwent dental implant surgery and delivered prostheses for more than 3 months in Nanjing First Hospital.

You may not qualify if:

• (1) The implant site or adjacent teeth were severely injured and the adjacent teeth were extracted;
• (2) the same quadrant orthodontic or splint treatment;
• (3) the prostheses have been removed due to failure or need further treatment;
• (4) implant-supported prostheses in both mesial and distal sites;
• (5) the adjacent teeth were directly or indirectly fixed with the implant-supported prosthesis;
• (6) patients with missing clinical records of PD, PCR and BOP.
• (7) The prosthetic prosthesis with implant-supported prosthesis was delivered for less than 3 months in Nanjing First Hospital.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Nanjing First Hospital

Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China

Location

Related Publications (4)

• Yen JY, Kang L, Chou IC, Lai YL, Lee SY. Risk assessment of interproximal contact loss between implant-supported fixed prostheses and adjacent teeth: A retrospective radiographic study. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.023. Epub 2020 Nov 7.

  PMID: 33172648 BACKGROUND

• Bompolaki D, Edmondson SA, Katancik JA. Interproximal contact loss between implant-supported restorations and adjacent natural teeth: A retrospective cross-sectional study of 83 restorations with an up to 10-year follow-up. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Mar;127(3):418-424. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.034. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

  PMID: 33342612 BACKGROUND

• Liang CH, Nien CY, Chen YL, Hsu KW. The prevalence and associated factors of proximal contact loss between implant restoration and adjacent tooth after function: A retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Jun;22(3):351-358. doi: 10.1111/cid.12918. Epub 2020 May 17.

  PMID: 32419242 BACKGROUND

• Gasser TJW, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T, Hammerle CHF, Thoma DS. Interproximal contact loss at implant sites: a retrospective clinical study with a 10-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 May;33(5):482-491. doi: 10.1111/clr.13908. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

  PMID: 35194854 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peri-Implantitis

Interventions

short-wavelength opsin; Radiation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Periodontal Diseases; Mouth Diseases; Stomatognathic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Physical Phenomena

Study Officials

• Changao Xue, Master

  The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

• Ning Luo, Master

  The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

• Juan Lin, Master

  The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Xin Wu, Master

CONTACT

13770326060; darkie777@163.com

Jiaping Wang

CONTACT

15563518685; wjpsally@stu.njmu.edu.cn

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: CASE ONLY
• Time Perspective: CROSS SECTIONAL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: June 20, 2024
• First Posted: June 26, 2024
• Study Start: July 1, 2024
• Primary Completion: September 30, 2024
• Study Completion: December 30, 2024
• Last Updated: June 26, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

CN (1)