NCT06470152

Brief Summary

Surgical outcomes, including radiographic outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, postoperative complications, and revision surgery rates, were compared in patients with adult spinal deformity who underwent correction surgery with reference to our pelvic incidence-dependent (PI-dependent) clustering of sagittal spinal alignment and existing standards (sagittal age-adjusted score \[SAAS\], global alignment and proportion \[GAP\] score, and Roussouly classification). Our findings may provide tangible guidance for surgical decision-making in ASD.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
20mo left

Started Dec 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress48%
Dec 2024Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 17, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 24, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2024

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

June 24, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

June 17, 2024

Last Update Submit

June 17, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proximal Junctional Kyphosis

    Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) was defined by a proximal junctional angle (PJA) (Cobb angle between the superior endplate of UIV+2 and inferior endplate of UIV) of \> 10° and a PJA angle difference of \> 10° from baseline at any time point up to latest follow-up.

    Two years after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Scoliosis Research Society-22

    One month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery

  • Oswestry disability index

    One month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery

  • Achievement of minimal clinically important difference

    Two years after surgery

Study Arms (2)

Patients with ASD undergoing correction surgery in reference to our novel criteria

EXPERIMENTAL

Correcting deformity according to the PI-dependent clustering of sagittal spinal alignment.

Procedure: Correction strategy in reference to our PI-dependent clustering of sagittal alignment

Patients with ASD undergoing correction surgery in reference to SAAS score.

OTHER

Correcting deformity according to the SAAS score.

Procedure: Correction strategy in reference to the SAAS score

Interventions

For type I patients (PI \< 39.56°), the target LL = -0.13\*PI2+9.36\*PI-134.08; for type II patients (39.56° ≤ PI \< 49.16°), the target LL = 0.45\*PI+26.57; for type III patients (49.16° ≤ PI \< 58.31°), the target LL = -0.15\*PI2+17.09\*PI-420.57; for type IV patients (PI \> 58.31°), the target LL = 0.06\*PI2-7.55\*PI+289.77. Prediction intervals of 95% confidence is adopted as the target LL range.

Patients with ASD undergoing correction surgery in reference to our novel criteria

This new score is composed of three sagittal parameters (PI-LL, PT and TPA). For these three parameters, points were assigned based on offset with age-adjusted targets 0 points if the parameter was within 10 years of the patient's age (Match). For each 20 years above the age-adjusted target, 1 point was added (e.g., + 1 point between + 10 and + 30, + 2 points between +30 and +50). Conversely, 1 point was subtracted for each 20 years below the age-adjusted target (e.g., -1 point between -10 and -30, -2 points between -30 and -50). SAAS was calculated by adding all 3 components, creating a discreet score that could have a negative value (under corrected) or positive value (over corrected). SAAS was sub-categorized into "SAAS-Under" if it was less than -1, "SAAS-Match" if it was between -1 and + 1 or "SAAS-Over" if it was greater than + 1.

Patients with ASD undergoing correction surgery in reference to SAAS score.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ≥ 18 years of age at the time of treatment;
  • Complete radiographic data, including standing posteroanterior and lateral whole-spine radiographs, lumbar computed tomography, and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging;
  • Radiographic evidence of ASD: sagittal vertical axis ≥ 50 mm, pelvic tilt ≥ 25°, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch ≥ 10°, and/or thoracic kyphosis ≥ 60°.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any type of previous spinal surgery;
  • Other musculoskeletal problems impeding walking ability, syndromic or neuromuscular diseases such as Parkinson\&#39;s disease, inflammatory conditions such as ankylosing spondylitis, infectious conditions such as spinal tuberculosis, metabolic diseases such as severe osteoporosis, and/or serious general medical conditions such as sepsis or malignancy;
  • Pathology of deformity as follows: post-traumatic deformity, adult idiopathic scoliosis of the thoracic spine, or de-novo lumbar scoliosis;
  • Hip joint Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥ II, history of hip joint and/or knee joint pain, and/or previous joint replacement.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100053, China

Location

Central Study Contacts

Shibao Lu, M.D.

CONTACT

Dongfan Wang, M.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2024

First Posted

June 24, 2024

Study Start

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

June 24, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations