NCT03304405

Brief Summary

This study intends to investigate the changes in gait pattern in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with sagittal imbalance. It will investigate the gait kinematics in patients who have a mismatch of their spinopelvic parameters, and a positive sagittal balance. The investigators hypothesise that patients with abnormal spinopelvic parameters may demonstrate a pathological gait pattern.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2016

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 27, 2017

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 9, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 6, 2020

Status Verified

May 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

September 27, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

ASD

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluate the effect of sagittal imbalance on the gait cycle using reflective surface markers

    To evaluate the effect of sagittal imbalance on the gait cycle using reflective surface markers

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Investigate the difference in gait kinematics between normal and abnormal sagittal balance using reflective surface markers

    1 year

  • Investigate the efficiency in gait differences between normal and abnormal sagittal balance using reflective surface markers

    1 year

  • Investigate different muscle recruitment in gait cycles between normal and abnormal sagittal balance using a submaximal graded exercise test

    1 year

Study Arms (1)

Gait Analysis

All patients will undergo gait analysis using reflective surface markers placed at different locations on the head, trunk, upper and lower extremities, and pelvis. All patients will complete an analog pain scale, Oswestry, and SRS-22 questionnaires. These are health-related quality of life questionnaires that provide subjective assessment.

Diagnostic Test: Gait Analysis

Interventions

Gait AnalysisDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

All patients will undergo gait analysis using reflective surface markers placed at different locations on the head, trunk, upper and lower extremities, and pelvis. All patients will complete an analog pain scale, Oswestry, and SRS-22 questionnaires. These are health-related quality of life questionnaires that provide subjective assessment.

Gait Analysis

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with diagnosis of ADS will be recruited in this study conducted by the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

You may qualify if:

  • All patients diagnosed with ASD, fulfilling the following radiographic criteria based on whole spine lateral film are eligible for recruitment:
  • SVA bigger than 47mm
  • Pelvic tilt (PT) bigger than 22deg
  • Pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) bigger than 11deg

You may not qualify if:

  • If the aetiology of the ASD of the patient is neuromuscular origin
  • other pathologies that may affect their gait such as previous trauma or surgeries to the pelvis or the lower limbs and joint replacements
  • inability to walk without aids for short distances

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Duchess of Kent Children's Hospital

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, Kim JH, Kang SB, Kim HS, Oh SJ. Risk factors of sagittal decompensation after long posterior instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 1;35(17):1595-601. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bdad89.

    PMID: 20386505BACKGROUND
  • Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Mar 15;30(6):682-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000155425.04536.f7.

    PMID: 15770185BACKGROUND
  • Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2024-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96.

    PMID: 16166889BACKGROUND
  • Smith JS, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Burton DC, Hart RA, Hostin R, Klineberg E; International Spine Study Group. Dynamic changes of the pelvis and spine are key to predicting postoperative sagittal alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a critical analysis of preoperative planning techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 1;37(10):845-53. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823b0892.

    PMID: 22024904BACKGROUND
  • Le Huec JC, Faundez A, Dominguez D, Hoffmeyer P, Aunoble S. Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases: a literature review. Int Orthop. 2015 Jan;39(1):87-95. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2516-6. Epub 2014 Sep 6.

    PMID: 25192690BACKGROUND
  • Barrey C, Roussouly P, Le Huec JC, D'Acunzi G, Perrin G. Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S834-41. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3030-z. Epub 2013 Sep 20.

    PMID: 24052406BACKGROUND
  • Engsberg JR, Bridwell KH, Reitenbach AK, Uhrich ML, Baldus C, Blanke K, Lenke LG. Preoperative gait comparisons between adults undergoing long spinal deformity fusion surgery (thoracic to L4, L5, or sacrum) and controls. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Sep 15;26(18):2020-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200109150-00016.

    PMID: 11547203BACKGROUND
  • Sarwahi V, Boachie-Adjei O, Backus SI, Taira G. Characterization of gait function in patients with postsurgical sagittal (flatback) deformity: a prospective study of 21 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 1;27(21):2328-37. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211010-00005.

    PMID: 12438980BACKGROUND
  • Gottipati P, Fatone S, Koski T, Sugrue PA, Ganju A. Crouch gait in persons with positive sagittal spine alignment resolves with surgery. Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):372-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Aug 18.

    PMID: 24011797BACKGROUND
  • Romei M, Galli M, Motta F, Schwartz M, Crivellini M. Use of the normalcy index for the evaluation of gait pathology. Gait Posture. 2004 Feb;19(1):85-90. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(03)00017-1.

    PMID: 14741307BACKGROUND
  • Syczewska M, Dembowska-Baginska B, Perek-Polnik M, Kalinowska M, Perek D. Gait pathology assessed with Gillette Gait Index in patients after CNS tumour treatment. Gait Posture. 2010 Jul;32(3):358-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Jul 13.

    PMID: 20630761BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Gait Analysis

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

GaitPhysical ExaminationDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisPhysical Functional PerformancePhysical FitnessHealthPopulation Characteristics

Study Officials

  • Dr Kenny Kwan, BMBCh(Oxon)

    The University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2017

First Posted

October 9, 2017

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion

June 1, 2017

Study Completion

June 1, 2017

Last Updated

May 6, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations