NCT06469736

Brief Summary

The incidence of kidney stones (urolithiasis) has surged in both developing and developed countries, affecting approximately 15% of the global population. From 2010 to 2019, diagnoses of kidney and ureteral stones rose by 8% in Germany, 26% in France, and 15% in England. Correspondingly, the number of surgical stone removal procedures increased by 3%, 38%, and 18%, respectively. Common treatments include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureterorenoscopy (URS) with lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). URS, depending on stone size, has become a preferred method due to advancements in intraoperative imaging and laser technology. Despite these improvements, small fragments often remain post-intervention, leading to recurrent stones. Complete removal of all fragments is crucial to significantly reduce recurrence rates. Current literature suggests a high recurrence rate with residual fragments, impacting healthcare costs and patient quality of life. A key objective in endourological research is optimizing the stone clearance rate. Techniques like coagulum lithotomy and the autologous blood clot technique have been developed to enhance residual stone removal after laser fragmentation. These methods benefit selected patients but are not widely adopted due to complications such as reduced intraoperative visibility and long coagulum formation times. Recently, a two-component hydrogel system called mediNiK® (Purenum GmbH, Germany) was developed. This biocompatible gel can be applied through an endoscope after stone fragmentation and large fragment retrieval to embed smaller fragments and dust, forming a removable conglomerate. MediNiK® has demonstrated effectiveness in embedding and removing stone residues and is already in clinical use in Europe, showing potential for optimizing stone removal. A multicenter study has assessed the safety and tolerability of mediNiK® in standard URS (Open, randomized, multicentre study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and performance of mediNiK® compared to standard treatment in kidney stone removal - DRKS00030532). Results indicate the gel is safe and tolerable. However, further data from larger cohorts and comparisons with conventional URS are necessary before widespread adoption of mediNiK®.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
2mo left

Started Jul 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress89%
Jul 2024Jul 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 13, 2024

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 24, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2024

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 30, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 30, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

September 9, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

June 13, 2024

Last Update Submit

September 2, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

HydrogelMediNiKHydrogel methodeStone Free RateZero Residual FragmentsURSDustingStone freeThuliumKidneystones

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Stone free Rate after URS

    To answer the primary research question, a comparison of the SFR between the two surgical procedures is planned using the chi-square test. In order to be able to show a statistically significant difference with regard to the surgical procedures according to the current data situation (75 % vs. 95 %), a sample size of 120 was defined with a power of 80 % and a significance level of 0.025 (the significance correction is made due to the definition of two co-primary endpoints in relation to the definition of freedom from stones).

    From enrollment to postoperative follow-up at 2 months.

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Surgery Duration

    During the procedure

  • Laser duration

    during the procedure

  • Basketing duration

    during the procedure

  • Complication

    after the procedure up to 1 month

  • Subjective assessment of the operation by the surgeon

    During the procedure

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Standard of Care Ureterorenoscopy

SHAM COMPARATOR

Arm A) Standard procedure ( URS) for the removal of kidney stones using URS

Procedure: Standard of Care Ureterorenoscopy

Standard of Care Ureterorenoscopy with MediNik

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Arm B) Standard procedure (URS) for the removal of kidney stones using URS in combination with the mediNiK®

Procedure: Standard of Care Ureterorenoscopy with MediNiK

Interventions

The patient provides written informed consent and is positioned in the supine position. After disinfection, sterile draping, and single-shot antibiotic administration a rigid cystoscopy is performed. Intubation of the ostium with a hydrophilic guidewire and placed into the renal pelvis under fluoroscopic control. After a semirigid URS, a working sheath is placed up to the Kidney. A flexible URS with lithotripsy with a Thulium lase is then performed to dust the stones. The fragments are retrieved for analysis. Finally, a double-J or mono-J stent and a transurethral catheter are placed.

Standard of Care Ureterorenoscopy

The patient provides written informed consent and is positioned in the supine position. After disinfection, sterile draping, and single-shot antibiotic administration a rigid cystoscopy is performed. Intubation of the ostium with a hydrophilic guidewire and placed into the renal pelvis under fluoroscopic control. After a semirigid URS, a working sheath is placed up to the Kidney. A flexible URS with lithotripsy with a Thulium lase is then performed to dust the stones. The fragments are retrieved for analysis. Application of MediNiK to embbed the residual stones in the hydrogel and extract it with a basket. Finally, a double-J or mono-J stent and a transurethral catheter are placed.

Standard of Care Ureterorenoscopy with MediNik

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female subjects aged ≥ 18 years
  • Evidence of nephrolithiasis on presentation of a preoperative computer tomography (CT) scan not older than 6 months
  • Minimum size of the kidney stones defined as \>10mm in the longest axis in the preoperative CT.
  • Ability to read, write and speak German
  • Women of childbearing age must have a negative serum pregnancy test at the start of the study.
  • Submission of a personally signed and dated informed consent form stating that the subject has been informed of all relevant aspects of the study prior to any trial-related activity and that all information has been understood

You may not qualify if:

  • Participation in another clinical trial for kidney stone removal in the last 6 months
  • Subjects with gastrointestinal cancer who have not been in remission for at least 2 years
  • Subjects with a single kidney, horseshoe kidney or other anatomical abnormalities that may increase the risk of surgery for the subject
  • Subjects with untreated ureteral stenosis or renal stenosis and narrow ureteropelvic junction/ureterovesical junction
  • Subjects with known impaired renal function from stage IV or known dialysis
  • Subjects with chronic hydronephrosis not associated with nephrolithiasis
  • Subjects with the following known or suspected diseases: Coagulation disorders, untreated urinary tract infections, renal disease sepsis and marked prostatic hyperplasia
  • Subjects with any other disease or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the purpose of the study (e.g. bleeding that restricts vision in the kidney, problems in the renal tubular system)
  • Breastfeeding or pregnant women
  • Subjects who may be part of a vulnerable group (e.g. prisoners or developmentally delayed adults)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital rechts der Isar

Munich, Bavaria, 81675, Germany

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Nephrolithiasis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Kidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrolithiasisMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Michael Straub, Doctor

    Technical University of Munich

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Thomas Amiel, doctor

CONTACT

Michael Straub, Doctor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Medical Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2024

First Posted

June 24, 2024

Study Start

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion

March 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2026

Last Updated

September 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The Patient Data is only planned for this Study

Locations