NCT06468787

Brief Summary

This is a multi-site, multi-group study that obtained two sets of ultrasound scans from all enrolled participants. Participants underwent limited ultrasound scanning by both cardiac sonographers and abdominal sonographers. Algorithm's performance on the view identification task and the object labeling task is computed.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 7, 2024

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 22, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 22, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 6, 2024

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 21, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 21, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

15 days

First QC Date

June 6, 2024

Last Update Submit

June 14, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • False discovery rate of the anatomical object labeling function on expert-obtained images

    The objective of this study is to compare the average frame-level disagreement of object labeling by majority opinion of five expert reviewers. The frame-level disagreement is defined as False Discovery Rate as in (1) FDR = 1-Precision=FP/(FP+TP) (1) Where TP≡True Positive and FP≡False Positive. A True Positive is counted when the majority opinion of five expert reviewers agrees with the location of predicted labels in the image. A False Positive counted when majority opinion of five expert reviewers disagrees with the location of one or more predicted labels. False Discovery Rate (FDR) is measured for a particular image frame between predicted objects and the majority opinion of five reviewers. The frame-level FDR threshold for this prospective study is 20%. Therefore, for a successful outcome the frame-level FDR must be less than 20%.

    Post data acquisition (3 months)

  • False discovery rate of the anatomical view identification function on expert-obtained images

    The objective of this study is to compare the average frame-level disagreement of object labeling by majority opinion of five expert reviewers. The frame-level disagreement is defined as False Discovery Rate as in (1) FDR = 1-Precision=FP/(FP+TP) (1) Where TP≡True Positive and FP≡False Positive. A True Positive is counted when the majority opinion of five expert reviewers agrees with the location of predicted labels in the image. A False Positive counted when majority opinion of five expert reviewers disagrees with the location of one or more predicted labels. False Discovery Rate (FDR) is measured for a particular image frame between predicted objects and the majority opinion of five reviewers. The frame-level FDR threshold for this prospective study is 20%. Therefore, for a successful outcome the frame-level FDR must be less than 20%.

    Post data acquisition (3 months)

Study Arms (1)

Anatomical Object Labeling and View Identification Comparison

EXPERIMENTAL

Labeling and identification comparative assessment

Device: Kosmos Anatomical Object Labeling and View Identification Algorithms

Interventions

Participants underwent limited ultrasound scanning by both cardiac sonographers and abdominal sonographers. Algorithm's performance on the view identification task and the object labeling task is compared to majority opinion of 5 radiologists.

Anatomical Object Labeling and View Identification Comparison

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 89 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Persons able to:
  • Read and sign an English consent form.
  • Give consent for participation.
  • Able and willing to comply with study requirements.
  • Those aged 18 years through 89 years, healthy as well as individuals with pathology, including but not limited to:
  • Persons with heart-related conditions such as myocardial or pericardial disease.
  • Persons with lung-related conditions such as: asthma, COPD, bronchitis, pulmonary fibrosis, sarcoidosis, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, bronchiectasis, lung cancer, pneumonia, pulmonary edema, pulmonary embolism
  • Persons with abdomen-related conditions such as: pancreatitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, irritable bowel syndrome, colitis, gastroenteritis, ulcers, abdominal aortic aneurysm, splenomegaly, liver disease, kidney disease.

You may not qualify if:

  • Children (minors) under 18 years old
  • Adults over 89 years old
  • Pregnant individuals
  • Those who cannot or refuse to sign their consent
  • Those who cannot provide informed consent
  • Those who cannot speak or read English
  • Vulnerable populations, i.e., individuals whose willingness to participate in the study could be unduly influenced by the expectation of medical benefits associated with participation
  • Individuals with mobility issues that prevent them from having an echo examination
  • Individuals with severe chest deformities, or other critical clinical situations, e.g., life critical urgent situations where there is no time for anything else than what is needed for patient care, that prevent them from having an echo examination.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

REVIVAL research institute, LLC

Sherman, Texas, 75092, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesSplenic DiseasesKidney DiseasesLung DiseasesGenital Diseases, Female

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cardiovascular DiseasesLymphatic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesGenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Asad Karim, MD

    Revival Research Institute LLC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2024

First Posted

June 21, 2024

Study Start

February 7, 2024

Primary Completion

February 22, 2024

Study Completion

February 22, 2024

Last Updated

June 21, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Locations