NCT06464744

Brief Summary

There is accumulating evidence that neuromodulation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex holds promise as a treatment for rehabilitation of motor function following a spinal cord injury. This study is designed to assess the clinical potential of non-invasive stimulation of the primary motor cortex to improve motor functions.The results will help to evaluate the clinical relevance of motor cortex stimulation for motor functions in patients with spinal cord injury. The outcomes of this study could potentially support the initiation of a larger clinical trial and the development of a new routine treatment.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
41mo left

Started Jan 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress41%
Jan 2024Sep 2029

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 15, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 5, 2024

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 18, 2024

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2028

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2029

Last Updated

June 18, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

June 5, 2024

Last Update Submit

June 17, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

rTMSrehabilitationspinal cord injurymotor cortex stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Motor evoked potentials

    Motor evoked potentials will be recorded at the start and the end of each stimulation session.

    From enrollment to the end of follow up at 12 weeks

  • Global spasticity

    Spasticity will be evaluated by using the modified Ashworth scale from 0 (no spasticity) to 4 (rigid extremities).

    From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks

  • Spasticity lower extremities

    The Wartenberg pendulum is an objective test to assess the biomechanical properties of spasticity.The test consists of dropping the leg of a relaxed patient from a horizontal position and measuring oscillatory movements with a goniometer.

    From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks

  • Nine-Hole Peg Test

    The Nine-Hole Peg Test is used to measure manual dexterity in patients with various neurological diagnoses. It is described in the literature to explore upper extremity function. Patients are asked to take nine pegs (7 mm diameter, 32 mm length) from a container (square box measuring 100 x 100 x 10 mm), one by one, and place them into the holes on the board, as quickly as possible. Scores are based on the time taken to complete the test activity, recorded in seconds.

    From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks

  • 10-meter walking test

    The 10-meter walk test (10MWT) is used to assess walking capabilities and walking speed in patients with gait impairments. Three trials will be recorded at the patient's fastest walking speed. The three trials are averaged and the gait speeds are documented in meters/second.

    From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks

  • Lower extremities kinematics

    Movement kinematics will be extracted from recordings with 3D motion capture trackers that will record joint coordinates in time.

    From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Numeric scale rating for pain evaluation

    From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks

  • European myelopathy score

    From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Potential adverse effect

    From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Placebo stimulation

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Patients will receive stimulation from a placebo coil that only delivers skin tingling but no active brain stimulation.

Procedure: Placebo stimulation using a placebo coil

Active stimulation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will receive active brain stimulation from a magnetic figure-of-eight-coil.

Procedure: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Interventions

Intermittent Theta burst stimulation will be delivered on the on the primary motor cortex using a figure-of-eight coil, supported by neuronavigation. The stimulation intensity will be set to 90% of the motor threshold

Active stimulation

The placebo coil looks identical to the active coil but it only delivers skin tingling and no active brain stimulation.

Placebo stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age over 18 years and less than 80 years
  • Chronic patients with an incomplete cervical and/or thoracic spinal cord injury (traumatic and non-traumatic) affecting upper and/or lower extremities (i.e., C4-T12 and classified as ASIA C or D) (Figure 138).
  • Capable and willing to provide informed consent and able to adhere to the treatment schedule
  • Patients who can be followed for the whole duration of the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindication to rTMS:
  • past severe head trauma
  • history of epilepsy or ongoing epilepsy
  • active cerebral tumor
  • intracranial hypertension
  • implanted ferromagnetic devices such as cardiac pacemaker and neurostimulator and cochlear implants
  • pregnancy or lactation.
  • Any clinically significant or unstable medical or psychiatric disorder
  • History of treatment with Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)
  • Subjects protected by law (guardianship or tutelage measure)
  • History of substance abuse (alcohol, drugs)
  • Pending litigation
  • Impossibility to understand the protocol or to fill out the forms
  • Chronic use of sedative medication
  • Participation in another clinical trial evaluating spinal cord injury

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet

Oslo, 0372, Norway

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord Diseases

Interventions

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Central Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Magnetic Field TherapyTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth, MD,PhD

    Oslo University Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Mark Züchner, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Placebo motor cortex stimulation
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Active motor cortex stimulation
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2024

First Posted

June 18, 2024

Study Start

January 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Last Updated

June 18, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations