Efficacy of rTMS Treatment After Spinal Cord Injury
Investigating the Efficacy of rTMS Treatment in Improving Motor Function After Spinal Cord Injury: A Placebo-controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is accumulating evidence that neuromodulation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex holds promise as a treatment for rehabilitation of motor function following a spinal cord injury. This study is designed to assess the clinical potential of non-invasive stimulation of the primary motor cortex to improve motor functions.The results will help to evaluate the clinical relevance of motor cortex stimulation for motor functions in patients with spinal cord injury. The outcomes of this study could potentially support the initiation of a larger clinical trial and the development of a new routine treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2029
June 18, 2024
June 1, 2024
4.6 years
June 5, 2024
June 17, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Motor evoked potentials
Motor evoked potentials will be recorded at the start and the end of each stimulation session.
From enrollment to the end of follow up at 12 weeks
Global spasticity
Spasticity will be evaluated by using the modified Ashworth scale from 0 (no spasticity) to 4 (rigid extremities).
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks
Spasticity lower extremities
The Wartenberg pendulum is an objective test to assess the biomechanical properties of spasticity.The test consists of dropping the leg of a relaxed patient from a horizontal position and measuring oscillatory movements with a goniometer.
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks
Nine-Hole Peg Test
The Nine-Hole Peg Test is used to measure manual dexterity in patients with various neurological diagnoses. It is described in the literature to explore upper extremity function. Patients are asked to take nine pegs (7 mm diameter, 32 mm length) from a container (square box measuring 100 x 100 x 10 mm), one by one, and place them into the holes on the board, as quickly as possible. Scores are based on the time taken to complete the test activity, recorded in seconds.
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks
10-meter walking test
The 10-meter walk test (10MWT) is used to assess walking capabilities and walking speed in patients with gait impairments. Three trials will be recorded at the patient's fastest walking speed. The three trials are averaged and the gait speeds are documented in meters/second.
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks
Lower extremities kinematics
Movement kinematics will be extracted from recordings with 3D motion capture trackers that will record joint coordinates in time.
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Numeric scale rating for pain evaluation
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks
European myelopathy score
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks
Other Outcomes (1)
Potential adverse effect
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Placebo stimulation
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients will receive stimulation from a placebo coil that only delivers skin tingling but no active brain stimulation.
Active stimulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive active brain stimulation from a magnetic figure-of-eight-coil.
Interventions
Intermittent Theta burst stimulation will be delivered on the on the primary motor cortex using a figure-of-eight coil, supported by neuronavigation. The stimulation intensity will be set to 90% of the motor threshold
The placebo coil looks identical to the active coil but it only delivers skin tingling and no active brain stimulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age over 18 years and less than 80 years
- Chronic patients with an incomplete cervical and/or thoracic spinal cord injury (traumatic and non-traumatic) affecting upper and/or lower extremities (i.e., C4-T12 and classified as ASIA C or D) (Figure 138).
- Capable and willing to provide informed consent and able to adhere to the treatment schedule
- Patients who can be followed for the whole duration of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to rTMS:
- past severe head trauma
- history of epilepsy or ongoing epilepsy
- active cerebral tumor
- intracranial hypertension
- implanted ferromagnetic devices such as cardiac pacemaker and neurostimulator and cochlear implants
- pregnancy or lactation.
- Any clinically significant or unstable medical or psychiatric disorder
- History of treatment with Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)
- Subjects protected by law (guardianship or tutelage measure)
- History of substance abuse (alcohol, drugs)
- Pending litigation
- Impossibility to understand the protocol or to fill out the forms
- Chronic use of sedative medication
- Participation in another clinical trial evaluating spinal cord injury
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet
Oslo, 0372, Norway
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth, MD,PhD
Oslo University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Placebo motor cortex stimulation
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2024
First Posted
June 18, 2024
Study Start
January 15, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2029
Last Updated
June 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share