NCT06464354

Brief Summary

The skeletonization technique of left internal artery (LIMA) harvesting is reported as more spar-ing to the vascular supply of the sternum. Some studies report a greater length and greater flow of the graft additionally. The aim of our study was to measure the difference in post-op sternal blood supply compared to the pedicle harvesting technique and to measure the length and flow of the LIMA graft.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2023

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 12, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 18, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 18, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

June 12, 2024

Last Update Submit

June 12, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

sternotomythermographycoronary bypassLIMAskeletonization technique

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rewarming time difference

    Duration of spontaneous rewarming of the skin surface of the caudal sternum after a cold stimulus, measured from 24°C to 27°C. Unit: seconds (s)

    first preoperatively and on 4th postoperative day

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Duration of the mammary graft harvesting

    during surgery, immediately after the graft harvesting

  • Length of the mammary artery graft

    during surgery, immediately after the graft harvesting

  • Free outflow of the mammary artery

    during surgery, just before the graft use

Study Arms (3)

LIMA - pedicle

Procedure: The mammary artery harvesting by the pedicle technique

LIMA - skeletonised

Procedure: The mammary harvesting using the skeletonization technique

Control group - LIMA not harvested

Procedure: No intervention

Interventions

The mammary artery harvesting by the pedicle technique was used in the LIMA pedicle study group.

LIMA - pedicle

The mammary harvesting using the skeletonization technique was used in the LIMA skeletonized study group.

LIMA - skeletonised

No intervention was used in the control study group.

Control group - LIMA not harvested

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery via sternotomy

You may qualify if:

  • Elective cardiac surgery procedure via median sternotomy
  • The left mammary artery (LIMA) harvesting for coronary bypass planned as a part of the operation - Group 1 and 2
  • Other cardiac surgery procedures without the LIMA harvesting (valve surgery for instance) - Control group
  • Signing of the informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Emergent surgery
  • Re-operation
  • Re-sternotomy
  • Thoracotomy approach
  • Harvesting of both mammary arteries (BIMA)
  • Endocarditis
  • Ongoing non-cardiac infection
  • Fever
  • Circulatory failure
  • Ongoing administration of catecholamines to patient
  • Unsigned informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital Ostrava

Ostrava, Moravial-Silesian Region, 70852, Czechia

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Cheng K, Rehman SM, Taggart DP. A Review of Differing Techniques of Mammary Artery Harvesting on Sternal Perfusion: Time for a Randomized Study? Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Nov;100(5):1942-53. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.087. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

    PMID: 26410160BACKGROUND
  • Alom S, Yang N, Bin Saeid J, Zeinah M, Harky A. Harvesting internal mammary artery: a narrative review. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2020 Dec;61(6):790-801. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11216-3. Epub 2020 Sep 4.

    PMID: 32885924BACKGROUND
  • Lamy A, Browne A, Sheth T, Zheng Z, Dagenais F, Noiseux N, Chen X, Bakaeen FG, Brtko M, Stevens LM, Alboom M, Lee SF, Copland I, Salim Y, Eikelboom J; COMPASS Investigators. Skeletonized vs Pedicled Internal Mammary Artery Graft Harvesting in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Post Hoc Analysis From the COMPASS Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Sep 1;6(9):1042-1049. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.1686.

    PMID: 34132753BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Ischemia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Radim Brát, Assoc.Prof.,MD,PhD,MBA

    University Hospital Ostrava

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Jiří Sieja, MD

    University Hospital Ostrava

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2024

First Posted

June 18, 2024

Study Start

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion

December 31, 2023

Study Completion

December 31, 2023

Last Updated

June 18, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.

Locations