Virtual Reality Treatment for Emerging Adults With ADHD
Development of a Novel Virtual Reality Treatment for Emerging Adults With ADHD
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this pilot randomized clinical trial is to test the impact of a virtual reality program for improving the ability of emerging adults (age 18-25) with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to stay focused while completing homework and studying. This study compares the impact of using a virtual reality headset to using a virtual reality headset while also receiving feedback about levels of focus to a control group. The main question is whether participants demonstrate significantly improved concentration while completing homework and studying in virtual reality and whether they enjoy and prefer working in a virtual reality environment. Concentration is measured both through participant report and also using keyboard and mouse click data to assess work productivity objectively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Sep 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 2, 2026
CompletedJanuary 2, 2026
November 1, 2025
7 months
May 31, 2024
July 28, 2025
December 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Objective On-Task Assessment Algorithm
Percentage of time on-task during each study session utilizing the Objective On-Task Assessment algorithmic mouse and keyboard click data. There are no subscales in this measure. Percentages below are for sessions 1-2 (T1) and 3-12 (T2). Participants had 2 weeks to complete sessions 1-7 and a 3rd week to complete the last 5 sessions (sessions 8-12), equaling 12 sessions within 3 weeks. The 1-7 and 8-12 time points were only for compensation/motivational purposes (payment after sessions 1-7 and after 8-12) and were not outcome measurement time points. Sessions 1+2 are combined for a time point because participants did not wear headsets for those two sessions, which we considered 'baseline,' giving us a base focus score before participants put on a headset. Participants wore the headsets for sessions 3-12. Percentages below were averaged for each time point. T1 is an average of session 1+2's percentages. T2 is an average of sessions 3-12's percentages.
Participants had 2 weeks to complete sessions 1-7 and a 3rd week to complete the last 5 sessions, equaling 12 sessions within 3 weeks.
Homework Concentration Index
This measure looks at how concentrated participants were while completing their homework.The rating options are Not True, Somewhat True, Pretty Much True, and Definitely True. There are no subscales in this measure, just a total score. The range is 7-28. Higher #s = worse concentration. The total score is summed. Numbers below are averages of units from sessions 1-2 (T1) and 3-12 (T2).The units were collected during each session's post survey. Sessions 1+2 are combined for a time point because participants did not wear headsets for those two sessions. Participants wore the headsets for sessions 3-12. Sessions 1+2 are considered baseline as they gave us a baseline score before participants put on a headset. Scores below were averaged for T1 (Sessions 1+2) and T2 (Sessions 3-12).
Participants had 2 weeks to complete sessions 1-7, a 3rd week to complete the last 5 sessions (sessions 8-12), equaling 12 sessions within 3 weeks.The 1-7 and 8-12 time points were only for compensation purposes and were not outcome measure points.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Homework Effort Index
Participants had 2 weeks to complete sessions 1-7, a 3rd week to complete the last 5 sessions (sessions 8-12), equaling 12 sessions within 3 weeks. The 1-7 and 8-12 time points were only for compensation purposes and were not outcome measure points.
Homework Motivation Index
Participants had 2 weeks to complete sessions 1-7, a 3rd week to complete the last 5 sessions (sessions 8-12), equaling 12 sessions within 3 weeks. The 1-7 and 8-12 time points were only for compensation purposes and were not outcome measure points.
Study Arms (3)
VR Passthrough
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this condition wear the same VR headset as participants in the in the other arms. However, they see directly through to their laptop and are not emersed in the virtual world.
Virtual Reality
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this condition wear the virtual reality headset. They are emersed in a virtual world that looks like a cabin room with windows. They are sitting at a desk and can see their laptop screen as part of the virtual world.
Virtual Reality + Feedback
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this condition wear the virtual reality headset. They are emersed in a virtual world that looks like a cabin room with windows. They are sitting at a desk and can see their laptop screen as part of the virtual world. The program tracks their keyboard and mouse click data to assess how consistently they are working. A stoplight in the virtual environment is green when they are working consistently and turns red when the not.
Interventions
Wearing the headset and headphones removes all outside audio and visual distractions. One of the groups receives frequent and consistent feedback about work productivity similar to behavioral interventions for ADHD.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70802, United States
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08854, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Joshua Langberg
- Organization
- Center for Youth Social Emotional Wellness - Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joshua M Langberg, PhD
Rutgers University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Psychology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2024
First Posted
June 12, 2024
Study Start
September 20, 2024
Primary Completion
April 30, 2025
Study Completion
July 30, 2025
Last Updated
January 2, 2026
Results First Posted
January 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Analyzed/experimental data related to the primary aims of the study will be submitted when a publication on the data is accepted, or the project period ends, and shared when published or one year after the project period ends, whichever comes first in both cases.
De-identified data can be used for many secondary analyses. Individual subject-level data and item-level data will be shared. Prior to sharing, all data will be de-identified so that it is HIPAA-compliant. Once deposited into an open database, data will be open to the greater scientific community according to the terms of the individual database. Data will then be fully available for secondary analyses, data mining, and to facilitate discovery by combining our data with that of other centers/investigators for large-scale analyses. As we will be using the NDA, this repository has policies and procedures in place that will provide data access to qualified researchers, fully consistent with NIH data sharing policies and applicable laws and regulations. The NIMH Data Archive (NDA) will serve as the primary data repository for the current proposal.