Quillivant Oral Suspension (Quillivant XR) in the Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
NWP06 in the Treatment of Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)- A Laboratory Classroom Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
45
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The objective of this study was to establish that an optimal dose of Quillivant XR oral suspension would result in a significant reduction in signs and symptoms of ADHD compared to placebo treatment in pediatric patients ages 6-12 years with ADHD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Apr 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 18, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 26, 2014
CompletedJune 26, 2014
May 1, 2014
4 months
May 18, 2009
May 27, 2014
May 27, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP)-Combined Scores at Hour 4 Post-Dose
The SKAMP scale measures the manifestations of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using an independent observer rating of the participant's impairment in classroom observed behaviors. SKAMP combined score is comprised of 13 items (including subscales: attention with items 1-4, deportment with items 5-8, quality of work with items 9-11 and compliance with items 12-13). The SKAMP composite score was obtained by summing up each item score where each item is rated on a 7-point impairment scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment) for a total possible combined score of 0 to 78; where higher score signified worst impairment.
Hour 4 post-dose
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Onset and Duration of Clinical Effect Based on SKAMP-Combined Scale
0.75, 2, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose
SKAMP Attention Subscale Score Over 12 Hours
0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose
SKAMP Deportment Subscale Score Over 12 Hours
0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose
Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Score Over 12 Hours
0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose
SKAMP Combined Scores Over 12 Hours
0.75, 2, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose
Other Outcomes (2)
SKAMP Quality of Work Subscale Score Over 12 Hours
0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose
SKAMP Compliance Subscale Score Over 12 Hours
0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose
Study Arms (2)
Active
EXPERIMENTALComparator
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Oral Suspension 25mg/5mL; 20-60 mg/day
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female from 6 to 12 years of age at the time of screening, inclusive.
- Diagnosis of ADHD by a Psychiatrist, Psychologist, Developmental Pediatrician, or a Pediatrician meeting diagnostic criteria for ADHD (DSM-IV). A Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children (K-SADS)16 was administered on all subjects to assist in diagnostic process.
- A clinician-administered Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) score of 3 or greater. An Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) score at screening or baseline greater than or equal to the 90th percentile normative values for gender and age in at least one of the following categories: the hyperactive-impulsive subscale, inattentive subscale or the total score.
- Subject must have been in need of pharmacological treatment for ADHD.
- Subjects taking a medication to control ADHD at the time of screening must have been experiencing suboptimal efficacy, a safety or tolerability issue or in need of a long-acting liquid formulation.
- For subjects taking any daily medication at screening aside from ADHD medication: parent or legal guardian agreed that there would be no elective changes in subject's medications during the study (10 weeks total).
You may not qualify if:
- Excluded comorbid psychiatric diagnoses: DSM-IV Axis I diagnosis (active) other than ADHD, with the exception of Specific Phobias, Learning Disorders, Motor Skills Disorders, Communication Disorders, Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Elimination Disorders, Sleep Disorders, and Adjustment Disorders.
- Clinically significant cognitive impairment as assessed in the clinical judgment of the Investigator. In cases where this was not clear, study staff were permitted to administer a Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI)17 to estimate the intelligence quotient (IQ). Significant cognitive impairment for this protocol was defined as an estimated IQ below 80.
- Subjects with chronic medical illnesses including seizure disorder (excluding a history of febrile seizures), severe hypertension, thyroid disease, structural cardiac disorders, serious cardiac conditions, serious arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, glaucoma, Tourette's Disorder, family history of Tourette's Disorder or tics.
- Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors within 30 days of the screening visit.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pfizerlead
Study Sites (2)
UC Irvine Child Development Center
Irvine, California, 92612, United States
Center for Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Incorporated
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128, United States
Related Publications (1)
Wigal SB, Childress AC, Belden HW, Berry SA. NWP06, an extended-release oral suspension of methylphenidate, improved attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms compared with placebo in a laboratory classroom study. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2013 Feb;23(1):3-10. doi: 10.1089/cap.2012.0073. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
PMID: 23289899DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Results for primary outcome is presented as absolute values and not as change from pre-dose and the secondary outcomes are presented at each post-dose time-point and not pre-dose, as planned.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
- Organization
- Pfizer, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 18, 2009
First Posted
May 20, 2009
Study Start
April 1, 2009
Primary Completion
August 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
June 26, 2014
Results First Posted
June 26, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05