NCT06451991

Brief Summary

The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to evaluate the effect of data collection and creating a patient care plan using a concept map on the student s clinical decision-making and reflective thinking skills of students taking the surgical diseases nursing course who are in the hospital for clinical practice.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
66

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 5, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 11, 2024

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 3, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 13, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 13, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 16, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

June 5, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 13, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Nursing educationConcept mapReflective thinkingClinical decision making

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Clinical Decision Making Scale in Nursing

    The scale consists of 40 items. The scale includes four sub-dimensions (10 items each), namely "investigating options and ideas", "investigating goals and values", "evaluating results" and "investigating knowledge and adopting new knowledge impartially". The scale is 5-point Likert type. The minimum total score of the scale is 40 points and the maximum score is 200 points. Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient is 0.78.

    3 weeks

  • Determination of Reflective Thinking Scale

    The scale is 5-point Likert type and consists of 16 items. The scale measures students' reflective thinking skill levels at the end of a lesson in four sub-dimensions, each consisting of four items: habit, comprehension, reflection and critical reflection. The lowest score that can be obtained from each sub-dimension is 4 and the highest score is 20. Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient is 0.77.

    3 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Teaching Material Evaluation Form

    3 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Traditional

NO INTERVENTION

The control group will use the traditional method data collection form and care plan.

Concept Map

EXPERIMENTAL

The experimental group will collect data and make a maintenance plan by using a concept map after the training.

Other: Use of concept map in clinical practice in nursing students

Interventions

Concept map will be used in clinical practice in nursing students.

Concept Map

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • To be taking surgical diseases nursing course
  • To agree to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • To have received training on concept mapping before the study
  • Not participating in the training given by the researchers before the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ankara Medipol University

Ankara, Ankara, 06050, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Culha, I. Active learning methods used in nursing education. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2019; 3(2), 74-86.

    BACKGROUND
  • Wu HZ, Wu QT. Impact of mind mapping on the critical thinking ability of clinical nursing students and teaching application. J Int Med Res. 2020 Mar;48(3):300060519893225. doi: 10.1177/0300060519893225.

    PMID: 32212879BACKGROUND
  • World Health Organization.

    BACKGROUND
  • Amaniyan S, Pouyesh V, Bashiri Y, Snelgrove S, Vaismoradi M. Comparison of the Conceptual Map and Traditional Lecture Methods on Students' Learning Based on the VARK Learning Style Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial. SAGE Open Nurs. 2020 Jul 8;6:2377960820940550. doi: 10.1177/2377960820940550. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

    PMID: 33415293BACKGROUND
  • Tutticci N, Lewis PA, Coyer F. Measuring third year undergraduate nursing students' reflective thinking skills and critical reflection self-efficacy following high fidelity simulation: A pilot study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 May;18:52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

    PMID: 27235566BACKGROUND
  • Karacabay, K, Savcı A, Öztürk B. Cerrahi Hastalıkları Hemşireliği Dersi Alan Öğrencilerin Kendi Kendine Öğrenme, Klinik Karar Verme ve Yansıtıcı Düşünme Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi 10.2 (2022): 667-680.

    BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Nilgün Sert Baş, RN, MSc

    Ankara Medipol University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Within the scope of the research, students will be divided into control (n=33) and experimental (n=33) groups by simple randomisation method. Since the students and instructors should know and follow the material to be used in the data collection process, blinding was not performed.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2024

First Posted

June 11, 2024

Study Start

March 3, 2025

Primary Completion

May 13, 2025

Study Completion

May 13, 2025

Last Updated

May 16, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations