The Effectiveness of Adhesive Versus Conventional Nasoalveolar Molding on Children With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The present study will compare the effectiveness of adhesive nasoalveolar molding (GS-NAM) and conventional nasoalveolar molding on the alveolar ridge, nasal, and labial growth in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. objectives: -
- 1.Evaluation of the anatomical position of the greater and lesser segments of the maxilla related to a stable midline anatomical point.
- 2.Evaluation of the nasal symmetry.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 20, 2025
CompletedJune 11, 2024
June 1, 2024
1 year
May 31, 2024
June 10, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Posterior ends of alveolar crest
width between the most posterior ends of the alveolar crest in the greater segment and lesser segment
3 months
Middle ends of alveolar crest
width between the middle parts of the cleft palate (The intersection points between the palatally extended buccal frenum sulcus line and the palatal gingival groove in the greater and lesser segment
3 months
Anterior ends of alveolar crest
The widths of the cleft gap (The anterior endpoint of the alveolar crest in the greater and lesser segment)
3 months
Mid line of maxilla
Inc-Sagittal: - Perpendicular distance from Inc point (The intersection points between the labial frenum-incisive papilla point line and the alveolar crest of the premaxilla in the greater segment) to sagittal line (The perpendicular line to the PG-PL line)
3 months
Angulation of maxilla
Mid-Inc)-Sagittal: - Angle among Inc point, midpoint in PG -PL, and sagittal line
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Alar base width
3 months
Columella length.
3 months
Columella angle deviation.
3 months
Nostril height and width on the cleft side.
3 months
Nostril height and width on the non-cleft side
3 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Adhesive nasoalveolar molding (GS-NAM)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR3D (3 dimensional ) printed conventional NAM in thickness of 2 mm. The cleft area will be blocked in software, and NAM will be fabricated using a 3D (3 dimensional ) printer. Soft acrylic resin will be added to make pressure area and reduction in opposing for relief. The appliance will be evaluated and adjusted monthly. A nasal stent will be fabricated when the cleft is 5mm
Conventional nasoalveolar molding
EXPERIMENTAL(positive control group) comprises 10 cases of unilateral cleft lip and palate that will be scheduled for construction of 3D (3 dimensional ) printed conventional NAM in thickness of 2 mm. The cleft area will be blocked in software, and NAM will be fabricated using a 3D printer. Soft acrylic resin will be added to make pressure area and reduction in opposing for relief. The appliance will be evaluated and adjusted monthly. A nasal stent will be fabricated when the cleft is 5mm
normal children
NO INTERVENTIONnormal children which will be compared with groups 1 and 2 for results evaluation
Interventions
compare the effectiveness of adhesive nasoalveolar molding (GS-NAM) and conventional nasoalveolar molding on the alveolar ridge, nasal, and labial growth in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: 1- 8 weeks.
- Gender: male and female.
- Patients with a unilateral cleft alveolus and lip.
- No developmental syndromes or atypical cleft pathology in medical history.
- No previous history of unilateral CLP correction.
- Motivated parents toward the treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a bilateral cleft alveolus and lip
- Syndromic patient
- Uncooperative caregiver
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Faculty of dental medicine
Cairo, 4050113, Egypt
Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys, Cairo), Al- Azhar University
Cairo, 4450113, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Adel F Hassan, Phd
Fucalty of dental medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2024
First Posted
June 11, 2024
Study Start
July 20, 2024
Primary Completion
July 20, 2025
Study Completion
August 20, 2025
Last Updated
June 11, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 4 months
- Access Criteria
- all IPD that underlie results in a publication
all IPD that underlie results in a publication