Outcome of a Cohort of Patients Fitted With a SYME Type Prosthesis in the Context of a Hindfoot Amputation With Distal Support

NCT06448260 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 2024-A00393-44
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 94
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to see outcome of patients with syme prothesis in order to comment the handfoot amputation.

Conditions

Amputation, Surgical; Walking, Difficulty

Keywords

Amputation; Prothesis; Outcome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

• The possibility of walking without a prosthesis

  Yes / No

  Immediatly after inclusion

• Walking perimeter with prosthesis

  In meters

  Immediatly after inclusion

• Number of re-amputation since first amputation

  Immediatly after inclusion

Study Arms (1)

Patient with ATCT

Patient with tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis with talectomy amputation

Other: Questionnary

Interventions

Questionnary OTHER

Data from theses patients will be collected in our personnal data base with ask of consent according to the law Then each patient alive will have questionnary to answer by phone or during a visit.

Patient with ATCT

Eligibility Criteria

• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient treated at the institut Rober Merle d'Aubigné

You may qualify if:

• Syme or Pirogoff or ATCT or arthrodesized Chopart type amputation
• Age \> 18 years old,
• First fitting or renewal of Syme type prosthesis delivered to IRMA between January 2008 and December 2018

You may not qualify if:

• Refusal documented in the file that the data be used for scientific purposes,
• Congenital etiology of the condition.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Institut Robert Merle d'aubigné: lead

Study Sites (1)

Institut Robert Merle d'Aubigné

Valenton, France

Location

Related Publications (4)

• Braaksma R, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JHB. Syme Amputation: A Systematic Review. Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Mar;39(3):284-291. doi: 10.1177/1071100717745313. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

  PMID: 29320640 BACKGROUND

• Dillon MP, Quigley M, Fatone S. Outcomes of dysvascular partial foot amputation and how these compare to transtibial amputation: a systematic review for the development of shared decision-making resources. Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 14;6(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0433-7.

  PMID: 28288686 BACKGROUND

• van der Wal GE, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JHB. Lisfranc and Chopart amputation: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Mar 10;102(10):e33188. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033188.

  PMID: 36897730 BACKGROUND

• Spoden M, Nimptsch U, Mansky T. Amputation rates of the lower limb by amputation level - observational study using German national hospital discharge data from 2005 to 2015. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 6;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3759-5.

  PMID: 30612550 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Mobility Limitation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: CASE CONTROL
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Target Duration: 1 Day
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: June 1, 2024
• First Posted: June 7, 2024
• Study Start: May 20, 2024
• Primary Completion: July 31, 2024
• Study Completion: September 30, 2024
• Last Updated: April 16, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-10

Locations

FR (1)