Remote Symptom Review in Patients With Implantable Diagnostic Holter
BIOMONI-DIG
Efficiency of a Clinical Process Based on Remote Review of Symptoms in Patients With an Implantable Diagnostic Holter.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To study the clinical and organizational benefit of implementing a methodology for monitoring patients receiving an implantable diagnostic BIOMONITOR III holter and successive models, consisting of remote review of alerts sent by the device via the HOME MONITORING remote monitoring platform and the transmission of relevant patient symptoms through the use of a specific application installable on the patient's phone. The efficiency of this methodology will be compared with a control group consisting of monitoring through the usual clinical practice of the hospital.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
Started Apr 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2026
CompletedMay 31, 2024
May 1, 2024
1 year
May 8, 2024
May 30, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
TIME FRAME
Time from the first alert by Home Monitoring of the implantable holter to the clinical diagnosis according to the patient's clinical indication.
one year
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Number of in-person visits in each group
one year
Incidence remote transmissions activated by patient indication
one year
Rate of false positives
one year
Rate of symptoms sent by the patient
one year
Rate of symptoms sent by the patient that correspond to remote alerts sent by the patient
one year
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Homemonitoring + APP
EXPERIMENTALThe patients receive the usual standard treatment with remote holter monitoring along with an app for the notification of adverse events.
Homemonitoring
NO INTERVENTIONThe patients receive the usual standard treatment with remote holter monitoring
Interventions
The patients will download an app through which they will be able to report adverse events related to their cardiovascular health.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients indicated for implantation of a subcutaneous implantable holter due to syncope or cryptogenic stroke (atrial fibrillation detection)
- Patients over 18 years old.
- Patients who consent to the installation of a patient application for telematic submission of patient-related symptoms.
- Patients capable of using the patient application.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients over 80 years of age or, failing that, not able to use an application to send their symptoms.
- Life expectancy of less than 12 months for any reason.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Andres Iñiguez Romolead
- Fundacin Biomedica Galicia Surcollaborator
- Fundacion Investigacion Interhospitalaria Cardiovascularcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro
Vigo, 36211, Spain
Related Publications (3)
Gupta N, Yang J, Reynolds K, Lenane J, Garcia E, Sung SH, Harrison TN, Solomon MD, Go AS; KP-RHYTHM Study Group. Diagnostic Yield, Outcomes, and Resource Utilization With Different Ambulatory Electrocardiographic Monitoring Strategies. Am J Cardiol. 2022 Mar 1;166:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.11.027. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
PMID: 34953575RESULTSharma AN, Baranchuk A. Ambulatory External Electrocardiography Monitoring: Holter, Extended Holter, Mobile Cardiac Telemetry Monitoring. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2021 Sep;13(3):427-438. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
PMID: 34330370RESULTVarma N, Epstein AE, Schweikert R, Michalski J, Love CJ; TRUST Investigators. Role of Automatic Wireless Remote Monitoring Immediately Following ICD Implant: The Lumos-T Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up Study (TRUST) Trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Mar;27(3):321-6. doi: 10.1111/jce.12895. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
PMID: 26661687RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Andrés Iñiguez Romo, MD, phD
Servicio Galego de Saude
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Cardiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2024
First Posted
May 29, 2024
Study Start
April 22, 2024
Primary Completion
May 1, 2025
Study Completion
May 1, 2026
Last Updated
May 31, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share