NCT06431828

Brief Summary

To study the clinical and organizational benefit of implementing a methodology for monitoring patients receiving an implantable diagnostic BIOMONITOR III holter and successive models, consisting of remote review of alerts sent by the device via the HOME MONITORING remote monitoring platform and the transmission of relevant patient symptoms through the use of a specific application installable on the patient's phone. The efficiency of this methodology will be compared with a control group consisting of monitoring through the usual clinical practice of the hospital.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 22, 2024

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 8, 2024

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 29, 2024

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 31, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

May 8, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 30, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Implantable loop recorderArrythmiaAtrial FibrillationHome Monitoring

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • TIME FRAME

    Time from the first alert by Home Monitoring of the implantable holter to the clinical diagnosis according to the patient's clinical indication.

    one year

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Number of in-person visits in each group

    one year

  • Incidence remote transmissions activated by patient indication

    one year

  • Rate of false positives

    one year

  • Rate of symptoms sent by the patient

    one year

  • Rate of symptoms sent by the patient that correspond to remote alerts sent by the patient

    one year

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Homemonitoring + APP

EXPERIMENTAL

The patients receive the usual standard treatment with remote holter monitoring along with an app for the notification of adverse events.

Other: APP

Homemonitoring

NO INTERVENTION

The patients receive the usual standard treatment with remote holter monitoring

Interventions

APPOTHER

The patients will download an app through which they will be able to report adverse events related to their cardiovascular health.

Homemonitoring + APP

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients indicated for implantation of a subcutaneous implantable holter due to syncope or cryptogenic stroke (atrial fibrillation detection)
  • Patients over 18 years old.
  • Patients who consent to the installation of a patient application for telematic submission of patient-related symptoms.
  • Patients capable of using the patient application.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients over 80 years of age or, failing that, not able to use an application to send their symptoms.
  • Life expectancy of less than 12 months for any reason.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro

Vigo, 36211, Spain

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Gupta N, Yang J, Reynolds K, Lenane J, Garcia E, Sung SH, Harrison TN, Solomon MD, Go AS; KP-RHYTHM Study Group. Diagnostic Yield, Outcomes, and Resource Utilization With Different Ambulatory Electrocardiographic Monitoring Strategies. Am J Cardiol. 2022 Mar 1;166:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.11.027. Epub 2021 Dec 23.

  • Sharma AN, Baranchuk A. Ambulatory External Electrocardiography Monitoring: Holter, Extended Holter, Mobile Cardiac Telemetry Monitoring. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2021 Sep;13(3):427-438. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

  • Varma N, Epstein AE, Schweikert R, Michalski J, Love CJ; TRUST Investigators. Role of Automatic Wireless Remote Monitoring Immediately Following ICD Implant: The Lumos-T Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up Study (TRUST) Trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Mar;27(3):321-6. doi: 10.1111/jce.12895. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial FibrillationSyncopeBradycardiaArrhythmias, Cardiac

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsUnconsciousnessConsciousness DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Andrés Iñiguez Romo, MD, phD

    Servicio Galego de Saude

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Andrés Iñiguez Romo, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Elvis Teijeira Fernández, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Cardiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2024

First Posted

May 29, 2024

Study Start

April 22, 2024

Primary Completion

May 1, 2025

Study Completion

May 1, 2026

Last Updated

May 31, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations