NCT06421142

Brief Summary

The aim of this trial is to investigate the value of FAPI PET/MRI, FDG PET/MRI and MRI in diagnosing MIBC and predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for MIBC patients, so as to guide the clinic to adjust the treatment plan in time and benefit MIBC patients.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
36mo left

Started Aug 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress39%
Aug 2024Jun 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 9, 2024

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 20, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 2, 2024

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2028

Expected
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2029

Last Updated

June 1, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

May 9, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 28, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Neoadjuvant ChemotherapyNeoplasm Staging

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (18)

  • Diagnostic Sensitivity

    It is the percentage of patients who will be correctly judged as positive (true positive) if they actually have muscle invasive bladder cancer. The formula is TP/(TP+FN)×100%.TP is true positive and FN is false negative.

    Within 1 week after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Diagnostic Specificity

    the percentage of patients who are not actually suffering from muscle invasive bladder cancer correctly judged as negative (true negative). The formula is TN/(TN+FP)×100%.TN is true negative, FP is false positive.

    Within 1 week after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Positive Expected Value (PPV)

    the ratio of true positives among the positive results obtained by a specific test method. The formula is: PPV=TP/(TP+FP)×100%.

    Within 1 week after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Negative Expected Value (NPV)

    refers to the ratio of true negatives among the negative results obtained by a specific test method. The formula is: NPV=TN/(TN+FN)×100%.

    Within 1 week after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Positive Likelihood Ratio (PLR)

    the ratio of the probability that a patient who actually has muscle invasive bladder cancer is judged to be positive to the probability that a patient who actually does not have muscle invasive bladder cancer is judged to be positive. The formula was calculated as +LR = sensitivity/(1-specificity) × 100%.

    Within 1 week after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Negative Likelihood Ratio (NLR)

    the ratio of the probability that a patient who actually has muscle invasive bladder cancer is judged negative to the probability that a patient who actually does not have muscle invasive bladder cancer is judged negative. The formula is: -LR=(1-sensitivity)/specificity×100%.

    Within 1 week after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Youden Index

    the sum of sensitivity and specificity minus 1. Correct diagnostic index can be used for the comparison of two diagnostic methods, and the ideal correct diagnostic index is 100%. r = (specificity + sensitivity) - 1 = 1 - (false positive rate + false negative rate)

    Within 1 week after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Standardized uptake values peak, maximum, and mean (SUVpeak , SUVmax, SUVmean)

    changes in SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak of the tumor lesion before and after treatment obtained from PET/MRI images.

    Within 1 week after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Tumor-to-Background Ratio (TBR)

    changes in the ratio of the radioactivity of tumor tissue to the radioactivity of background tissue obtained from PET/MRI images before and after treatment.

    Within 1 week after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Complete Remission (CR)

    In RECIST 1.1 Efficacy assessment criteria for conventional imaging, CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, the absence of new lesions, and the normalization of tumor markers for at least 4 weeks. In PERCIST 1.1 efficacy evaluation criteria for FAPI PET/MRI and FDG PET/MRI, CR refers to the complete disappearance of tracer uptake.

    Within 1 month after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Partial Remission (PR)

    In RECIST 1.1 Efficacy assessment criteria for conventional imaging, PR was defined as a decrease of ≥30% in the sum of the largest diameters of target lesions for at least 4 weeks. In PERCIST 1.1 efficacy evaluation criteria for FAPI PET/MRI and FDG PET/MRI, PR refers to a decrease of \>30% in the peak SUV.

    Within 1 month after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Stable Disease (SD)

    In RECIST 1.1 Efficacy assessment criteria for conventional imaging, SD was defined as a decrease in the sum of the largest diameters of the target lesions that did not reach PR or an increase in the size of the largest diameters of target lesions that did not reach PD. In PERCIST 1.1 efficacy evaluation criteria for FAPI PET/MRI and FDG PET/MRI, SD refers to a decrease of \>30% in the peak SUV.

    Within 1 month after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Progressive Disease (PR)

    In RECIST 1.1 Efficacy assessment criteria for conventional imaging, PD was defined as an increase in the sum of the largest diameters of the target lesions by at least ≥20% or the emergence of new lesions. In PERCIST 1.1 efficacy evaluation criteria for FAPI PET/MRI and FDG PET/MRI, PD refers to an increase of \>30% in the peak SUL or the appearance of new lesions.

    Within 1 month after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Complete Metabolic Response (CMR)

    For participants receiving FAPI PET/MRI and FDG PET/MRI, according to EORTC efficacy assessment criteria, CMR refers to the complete disappearance of tracer uptake.

    Within 1 month after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Partial Metabolic Response (PMR)

    For participants receiving FAPI PET/MRI and FDG PET/MRI, according to EORTC efficacy assessment criteria, PMR refers to a reduction in SUV of ≥15%-25% after one cycle of treatment and a reduction in SUV of \>25% after greater than one cycle of treatment.

    Within 1 month after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Stable Metabolic Disease (SMD)

    For participants receiving FAPI PET/MRI and FDG PET/MRI, according to EORTC efficacy assessment criteria, SMD refers to an increase in SUV of \<25% or a decrease of \<15%, and tumor no significant increase in the extent of uptake (\>20% increase in maximum diameter)

    Within 1 month after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Progressive Metabolic Disease (PMD)

    For participants receiving FAPI PET/MRI and FDG PET/MRI, according to EORTC efficacy assessment criteria, PMD refers to an increase in SUV value of \>25% and a significant increase in the extent of tumor uptake (increase in the largest diameter of \>20%), or the appearance of new foci.

    Within 1 month after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Pathologic Response

    According to pathological efficacy assessment criteria, Pathological Complete Remission(pCR) refers to no detectable tumor (pT0) or residual cancer confined to the original site (pTis) after treatment. According to pathological efficacy assessment criteria, A decrease in tumor stage from cT2 (Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer - MIBC) to non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), including stages pT0, pTis, pTa, and pT1, indicates a treatment-sensitive tumor and is considered a good pathologic response. Conversely, if the tumor stage remains the same or increases, it is considered a poor pathologic response.

    Within 1 month after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Overall Survival (OS)

    1 years to 3 years after receiving treatment

  • Radiographic Progression Free Survival (rPFS)

    1 years to 3 years after receiving treatment

  • Overall Remission Rate (Objective Response Rate, ORR)

    Within 1 month after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

  • Disease Control Rate (DCR)

    Within 1 month after obtaining the surgical pathology report and imaging report results

Study Arms (6)

MIBC diagnostic study-FAPI PET/MRI

EXPERIMENTAL

suspected MIBC participants receive FAPI PET/MRI examination after entering the group.

Procedure: imaging examinations:FAPI PET/MRI, FDG PET/MRI, MRI

MIBC diagnostic study-FDG PET/MRI

EXPERIMENTAL

suspected MIBC participants receive FDG PET/MRI examination after entering the group.

Procedure: imaging examinations:FAPI PET/MRI, FDG PET/MRI, MRI

MIBC diagnostic study-MRI

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

suspected MIBC participants receive MRI examination after entering the group.

Procedure: imaging examinations:FAPI PET/MRI, FDG PET/MRI, MRI

MIBC neoadjuvant evaluation study-FAPI PET/MRI

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients diagnosed with MIBC receive FAPI PET/MRI examination before and after neoadjuvant therapy.

Procedure: imaging examinations:FAPI PET/MRI, FDG PET/MRI, MRI

MIBC neoadjuvant evaluation study-FDG PET/MRI

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients diagnosed with MIBC receive FDG PET/MRI examination before and after neoadjuvant therapy.

Procedure: imaging examinations:FAPI PET/MRI, FDG PET/MRI, MRI

MIBC neoadjuvant evaluation study-MRI

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients diagnosed with MIBC receive MRI examination before and after neoadjuvant therapy.

Procedure: imaging examinations:FAPI PET/MRI, FDG PET/MRI, MRI

Interventions

FAPI PET/MRI and FDG PET/MRI examination Data acquisition was performed using a GE Healthcare SIGNA PET/MR instrument. Enrolled patients were injected intravenously with 68Ga-FAPI or 18F-FDG tracer and underwent simultaneous PET and MRI scanning approximately 30-60 minutes after intravenous administration of the tracer at a dose of 1.85-3.7 MBq/kg. MRI examination MRI examination was performed using a Skyra 3.0T MRI scanner from Siemens, Germany, with a 16-channel phased-array surface coil, and the scanning range was from the superior margin of the iliac wing to the inferior margin of the pubic symphysis.

MIBC diagnostic study-FAPI PET/MRIMIBC diagnostic study-FDG PET/MRIMIBC diagnostic study-MRIMIBC neoadjuvant evaluation study-FAPI PET/MRIMIBC neoadjuvant evaluation study-FDG PET/MRIMIBC neoadjuvant evaluation study-MRI

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with suspected muscle-invasive bladder cancer;
  • Completion of FAPI PET/MRI, FDG PET/MRI and MRI;
  • Complete clinical laboratory and pathological data.
  • Patients diagnosed with muscle invasive bladder cancer;
  • Completion of FAPI PET/MRI, FDG PET/MRI, and MRI before neoadjuvant therapy;
  • Complete clinical laboratory and pathological data.

You may not qualify if:

  • Combined with other malignant tumors;
  • Not receiving surgical treatment;
  • Receiving neoadjuvant therapy before surgery;
  • Previous allergy to contrast components or similar components;
  • Serious organ function abnormalities, such as heart, lung, liver, kidney function serious abnormalities;
  • Incomplete clinicopathological data
  • Combination of other malignant tumors;
  • FAPI PET/MRI, FDG PET/MRI and MRI were not completed after neoadjuvant therapy;
  • Prior hypersensitivity to contrast components or similar components;
  • Serious organ function abnormalities, such as serious abnormalities of heart, lung, liver and kidney function;
  • Incomplete clinicopathological data.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

first hospital affiliated of Fujian medical university

Fuzhou, Fujian, 350005, China

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Interventions

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spectrum AnalysisChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Xue-Yi Xue, Master

    First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Ning Xu, Doctor

CONTACT

Xiao-Dong Li, Master

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: In the MIBC diagnostic study and neoadjuvant efficacy prediction study, each patient underwent FAPIPET/MRI, FDGPET/MRI and MRI examinations, and were grouped and analyzed according to different examination methods.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Deputy Director of Department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2024

First Posted

May 20, 2024

Study Start

August 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Last Updated

June 1, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

We have chosen not to share the individual participant data (IPD) from this clinical study due to privacy and confidentiality concerns, as well as potential proprietary interests. Additionally, sharing IPD requires considerable resources for data de-identification and preparation, which may not be feasible within the scope of this study. However, we remain committed to transparency and will provide summary results and findings through appropriate channels, ensuring the dissemination of key insights while safeguarding participant privacy and confidentiality

Locations