Study Stopped
closed study due to lack of faculty
Tranexamic Acid in Vaginal Reconstructive Surgery
TEXAS
Local Infiltration of TranExamic Acid in Surgical Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been demonstrated to reduce blood loss in trauma, orthopedic, cardiac, and plastic surgeries in numerous well-designed and adequately powered studies. As a result of this evidence for benefit, TXA is routinely used to reduce blood loss during these surgeries. There are no studies regarding the use of TXA in urogynecology. The investigators seek to explore the effect and safety of local infiltration of TXA in vaginal reconstructive surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jul 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 27, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 27, 2025
CompletedJanuary 31, 2025
January 1, 2025
7 months
May 8, 2024
January 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intraoperative quantitative blood loss QBL (mL)
Compare intraoperative QBL during colpocleisis with the local infiltration of Tranexamic acid to the current standard of care, vasopressin or normal saline.
Intraoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Colpocleisis operative time (min)
Intraoperatively
Intraoperative blood pressure (mmHg)
Intraoperatively
Intraoperative hear rate (beats/min)
Intraoperatively
Postoperative complications
2 weeks and 6 weeks postoperatively
Rate of transfusion
Intraoperatively and 2 weeks postoperatively
Study Arms (3)
Normal Saline (NaCl 0.9%)
PLACEBO COMPARATORLocal infiltration of 50 cc NaCl 0.9% into the vaginal submucosa during colpocleisis dissection
Tranexamic Acid (2 mg/dL)
EXPERIMENTALLocal infiltration of 50 cc Tranexamic Acid (2 mg/dL) into the vaginal submucosa during colpocleisis dissection
Vasopressin (0.1 U/dL)
EXPERIMENTALLocal infiltration of 50 cc Vasopressin (0.1 U/dL) into the vaginal submucosa during colpocleisis dissection
Interventions
The intervention of 50 cc TXA (2 mg/mL) local infiltration is determined after carefully reviewing the literature. Scarafoni et al. recommends that the local TXA should not exceed at a concentration of 5-10 mg/mL to avoid cytotoxicity that may affect the wound re-epithelialization (22). In a prospective study on facelift bleeding, Kochuba et al. demonstrates that local TXA (1-2 mg/mL) with total 100 mg and 200 mg TXA safely and effectively decreased bleeding, operating room time, and drain output compared with traditional local anesthetic technique (14). Fathimani et all reports the local use of modified tumescent anesthesia solution with low TXA concentration (2 mg/dL) and total average dosage of TXA ranging 120-1000 mg is safe and promising in achieving less ecchymosis, edema, and seroma in common facial cosmetic surgical procedures (31). With a total dosage of 100 mg TXA and a volume of 50 cc injection, the concentration is calculated to be 2 mg/dL.
The intervention of 50 cc Vasopressin (0.1U/mL) local infiltration is determined from several systematic reviews. Hafidh et al. shows that injection of diluted Vasopressin (3.6 to 10 units) with various concentration during hysterectomy significantly reduces the intraoperative blood loss when compared to placebo, and without increasing the hazard of cardiovascular toxicities. Cui et al. reports similar results, but including other vaginal surgeries. The common preparation for dilute Vasopressin is 0.1 U/mL or 1.0 U/mL from a 1cc vial of 20 U/mL Vasopressin. The advantage of 0.1 U/mL concentration is to avoid a relatively large bolus of concentrated 1.0 U/mL Vasopressin injected intravascularly by accident. A cumulative total dose of 4 to 6 units of Vasopressin administered in a dilute solution is proposed to be an upper limit. Therefore, the cumulative total dose of 5 units Vasopressin from 50 cc (0.1U/mL) is in the safe therapeutic range.
The intervention of 50 cc NaCl 0.9% local infiltration serves a placebo control.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Females who are menopausal at the time of consent
- Able to understand and read English
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent
- Able to comply with the follow-up study protocol, per clinician judgment
- Symptomatic POP (bulge or pressure) evidenced with vaginal prolapse with POP-Q measurement consistent with Stage II-IV
- LeFort or complete colpocleisis as desired surgical approach to correct POP with and without other concomitant procedures
- History of abdominal or vaginal surgery for POP
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II
You may not qualify if:
- Texas Department of Criminal Justice prisoners
- Refusal of blood products (e.g, Jehovah's witnesses)
- ASA physical status III or IV
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to TXA or any of the ingredients
- Subarachnoid hemorrhage
- Active intravascular clotting, thromboembolic disease (cerebral thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism)
- Epilepsy, seizure disorders requiring anti-epileptic medication(s)
- Acquired impaired color vision (color blindness, retinal involvement)
- Intrinsic risk of thrombosis or thromboembolism (hypercoagulopathy, thrombogenic cardiac rhythm disease, thrombogenic valvular disease)
- History of severe liver disease
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to 8-L-arginine vasopressin or chlorobutanol
- History of cardiac diseases (decompensated congestive heart failure CHF, recent coronary artery disease CAD within 30 days, recent myocardial infarction MI within 30 days)
- History of reversible nephrogenic diabetes insipidus
- History of primary pelvic organ cancer (uterine, ovarian, endometrial, cervical, bladder) or any cancer that is metastatic to the pelvis
- Prior or current pelvic radiation, or chemotherapy.
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (26)
Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;116(5):1096-100. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f73729.
PMID: 20966694BACKGROUNDCheng W, Bu C, Hong F, Zhong X, Jin C, Yang X, Sun X, Wang J. Perioperative hemorrhagic complications in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jul;30(7):1141-1146. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3667-6. Epub 2018 May 21.
PMID: 29785542BACKGROUNDLambrou NC, Buller JL, Thompson JR, Cundiff GW, Chou B, Montz FJ. Prevalence of perioperative complications among women undergoing reconstructive pelvic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Dec;183(6):1355-8; discussion 1359-60. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.110911.
PMID: 11120496BACKGROUNDJohnson DJ, Scott AV, Barodka VM, Park S, Wasey JO, Ness PM, Gniadek T, Frank SM. Morbidity and Mortality after High-dose Transfusion. Anesthesiology. 2016 Feb;124(2):387-95. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000945.
PMID: 26569167BACKGROUNDGhadimi K, Levy JH, Welsby IJ. Perioperative management of the bleeding patient. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Dec;117(suppl 3):iii18-iii30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew358.
PMID: 27940453BACKGROUNDCui Y, Chen I, Chernoff A, Clancy A. Effectiveness of prophylactic pharmacological hemostatic agents for reduction of blood loss at vaginal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Dec;34(12):2945-2957. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05614-1. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
PMID: 37584705BACKGROUNDHafidh B, Latifah HM, Gari A, Alshahrani MS, AlSghan R, Alkhamis WH, Allam HS, AlRasheed MA, Bakhsh H, Abu-Zaid A, Baradwan S. Vasopressin to Control Blood Loss during Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Mar;29(3):355-364.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.10.003. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
PMID: 34648933BACKGROUNDWillis-Gray MG, Husk KE, Brueseke TJ, Connolly A, Geller EJ. Lidocaine Use in Vaginal Surgery and Risk of Toxicity. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Sep;26(9):546-549. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000622.
PMID: 30346319BACKGROUNDZakhari A, Sanders AP, Solnik MJ. Tranexamic acid in gynecologic surgery. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Mar;36(3):513-520. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1708533. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
PMID: 31865770BACKGROUNDLuetzenberg FS, Lyford-Pike S. Modern use of tranexamic acid in facial plastic surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Aug 1;31(4):219-223. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000886. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
PMID: 37052603BACKGROUNDBreau RH, Kokolo MB, Punjani N, Cagiannos I, Beck A, Niznick N, Buenaventura C, Cowan J, Knoll G, Momoli F, Morash C, Ruzicka M, Schachkina S, Tinmouth A, Xie HY, Fergusson DA. The effects of lysine analogs during pelvic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transfus Med Rev. 2014 Jul;28(3):145-55. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 18.
PMID: 24958068BACKGROUNDEl Minawi HM, Kadry HM, El-Essawy NM, El Saadany ZA, Nouh OM. The effect of tranexamic acid on blood loss in liposuction: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Plast Surg. 2023;46(2):227-237. doi: 10.1007/s00238-022-01995-6. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
PMID: 36311870BACKGROUNDCouto RA, Charafeddine A, Sinclair NR, Nayak LM, Zins JE. Local Infiltration of Tranexamic Acid With Local Anesthetic Reduces Intraoperative Facelift Bleeding: A Preliminary Report. Aesthet Surg J. 2020 May 16;40(6):587-593. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz232.
PMID: 31504134BACKGROUNDKochuba AL, Coombs DM, Kwiecien GJ, Sinclair NR, Zins JE. Prospective Study Assessing the Effect of Local Infiltration of Tranexamic Acid on Facelift Bleeding. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Mar 12;41(4):391-397. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa198.
PMID: 32644111BACKGROUNDCoombs DM, Kwiecien GJ, Sinclair NR, Jin A, Zins JE. Local Infiltration of Tranexamic Acid During Facelift Improves Operating Room Efficiency: A Matched Patient Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Aug 24;42(9):971-977. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac067.
PMID: 35350068BACKGROUNDAusen K, Fossmark R, Spigset O, Pleym H. Safety and Efficacy of Local Tranexamic Acid for the Prevention of Surgical Bleeding in Soft-Tissue Surgery: A Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Plastic Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Mar 1;149(3):774-787. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008884.
PMID: 35196701BACKGROUNDRohrich RJ, Cho MJ. The Role of Tranexamic Acid in Plastic Surgery: Review and Technical Considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Feb;141(2):507-515. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003926.
PMID: 28938364BACKGROUNDBuchsbaum GM, Lee TG. Vaginal Obliterative Procedures for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017 Mar;72(3):175-183. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000406.
PMID: 28304415BACKGROUNDGrzybowska ME, Futyma K, Kusiak A, Wydra DG. Colpocleisis as an obliterative surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: is it still a viable option in the twenty-first century? Narrative review. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jan;33(1):31-46. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04907-7. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
PMID: 34406418BACKGROUNDvon Pechmann WS, Mutone M, Fyffe J, Hale DS. Total colpocleisis with high levator plication for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):121-6. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.546.
PMID: 12861149BACKGROUNDHill AJ, Walters MD, Unger CA. Perioperative adverse events associated with colpocleisis for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):501.e1-501.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.921. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
PMID: 26529371BACKGROUNDElena Scarafoni E. A Systematic Review of Tranexamic Acid in Plastic Surgery: What's New? Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Mar 23;9(3):e3172. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003172. eCollection 2021 Mar.
PMID: 33907653BACKGROUNDFrishman G. Vasopressin: if some is good, is more better? Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb;113(2 Pt 2):476-477. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819698bb. No abstract available.
PMID: 19155925BACKGROUNDQuantitative Blood Loss in Obstetric Hemorrhage: ACOG COMMITTEE OPINION, Number 794. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;134(6):e150-e156. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003564.
PMID: 31764759BACKGROUNDKer K, Beecher D, Roberts I. Topical application of tranexamic acid for the reduction of bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 23;2013(7):CD010562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010562.pub2.
PMID: 23881695BACKGROUNDDILLON TF, MARBURY BE, BONSNES RW, DOUGLAS RG, DU VIGNEAUD V. Vasopressin as a hemostatic in gynecologic surgery; a preliminary report. Obstet Gynecol. 1958 Apr;11(4):363-71. No abstract available.
PMID: 13517741BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gokhan Kilic, MD
University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ann Tran, MD
Mount Sinai Hospital & Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The attending anesthesiologist will receive the randomized assignment from the lead research team at UTMB and prepare the diluted study agents. The OR staff, attending surgeon, and learners including fellows and residents are blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2024
First Posted
May 17, 2024
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
January 27, 2025
Study Completion
January 27, 2025
Last Updated
January 31, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We are not planning to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.