NCT03779633

Brief Summary

Introduction With increasing age the incidence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) rises and will increase substantially in the future according to forecasting studies. It is possible that oestrogens, alone or in combination with other forms of therapy, may assist in the management of POP by increasing collagen synthesis and thereby improving the strength of the weakened vaginal epithelium. Yet, studies investigating the effect of topical oestrogen and its impact on POP associated symptoms, both self-reported improvement and observations of objective improvement, are lacking. Objective To evaluate the subjective efficacy concerning prolapse associated complaints measured by the German pelvic floor questionnaire (domain POP: POP-score) after preoperative use of local oestrogen compared to preoperative placebo treatment in postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Further variables of interest are POP-score after 3 months, differences regarding the objective prolapse quantification system (POP-Q), surgical outcome and tissue operability assessed by the surgeon. Methods In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study the investigators aim to include 120 postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and indicated operative procedure. An analysis of covariance will be computed with the depending variable POP-score after 6 weeks and the independent variables group (verum versus placebo) and Pop-Score at baseline.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2017

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 2, 2017

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 29, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 19, 2018

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 27, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 27, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

November 17, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

July 29, 2018

Last Update Submit

November 16, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Local Oestrogen

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • subjective prolapse associated symptoms (measured with the validated German pelvic floor questionnaire)

    treatment efficacy of preoperative vaginally administered oestrogen in postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in comparison to placebo, measured by a subjective questionnaire. 42 questions. Range 0 to 3 points for each question. Lower values represent a better outcome

    change from baseline POP Score at 6 weeks after treatment

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • operative time in minutes

    up to 1 week postoperative

  • length of stay in days

    up to 1 week postoperative

  • intraoperative blood loss in ml

    up to 1 week postoperative

  • blood circulation of the tissue (good, regular, scarce, no blood circulation)

    on day of surgery

  • separability of the tissue layers (good, regular, scarce, not possible)

    on day of surgery

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Linoladiol Estradiol

EXPERIMENTAL

Linoladiol Estradiol cream 6 weeks before surgery of pelvic organ prolapse

Drug: Linoladiol Estradiol

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo cream 6 weeks before surgery of pelvic organ prolapse

Other: Placebo vaginal cream

Interventions

Linoladiol Estradiol Initial dose (week 1): 1 application (2g Linoladiol = 0.2mg Estradiol) every day for the first week Maintenance dose 1 (week 2) : 1 application (2g Linoladiol = 0.2mg Estradiol) every 48 hours the following week. Maintenance dose 2 (week 3-6): 1 application (2g Linoladiol = 0.2mg Estradiol) twice per week the following 4 weeks. Route of administration: intravaginally by means of a calibrated applicator before retiring at night Duration: 6 weeks

Also known as: Montavit ATC Code G03CA03
Linoladiol Estradiol

Initial dose (week 1): 1 application every day for the first week Maintenance dose 1 (week 2) : 1 application every 48 hours the following week. Maintenance dose 2 (week 3-6): 1 application twice per week the following 4 weeks. Route of administration: intravaginally by means of a calibrated applicator before retiring at night Duration: 6 weeks

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Postmenopausal women
  • Able to read, understand and sign informed consent
  • Able to apply a vaginal cream
  • Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse with planned and indicated prolapse surgical repair

You may not qualify if:

  • Suspicion or history of breast cancer or other oestrogen responsive malignancies (endometrial cancer)
  • unexplained abnormal vaginal bleeding
  • history of deep vein thrombosis
  • inherited or acquired blood clotting disorders (eg, APC resistance, Antithrombin III deficiency)
  • transient ischaemic attack, myo- cardial infarction or ischaemic heart disease
  • Hypersensitivity to oestrogen
  • Unable to read and sign informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tulln

Tulln, 3430, Austria

Location

Department of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology of the Medical University Vienna

Vienna, 1090, Austria

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Weber MA, Kleijn MH, Langendam M, Limpens J, Heineman MJ, Roovers JP. Local Oestrogen for Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0136265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136265. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 26383760BACKGROUND
  • Rahn DD, Good MM, Roshanravan SM, Shi H, Schaffer JI, Singh RJ, Word RA. Effects of preoperative local estrogen in postmenopausal women with prolapse: a randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Oct;99(10):3728-36. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-1216. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

    PMID: 24947034BACKGROUND
  • Taithongchai A, Johnson EE, Ismail SI, Barron-Millar E, Kernohan A, Thakar R. Oestrogen therapy for treating pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 11;7(7):CD014592. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014592.pub2.

  • European Urogynaecological Association 2021 Annual Meeting | Hybrid Edition. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022 Apr 1;28(4):244-271. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001172. No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProlapsePathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Double-blind, Placebo-controlled
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2018

First Posted

December 19, 2018

Study Start

February 2, 2017

Primary Completion

August 27, 2020

Study Completion

August 27, 2020

Last Updated

November 17, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Locations