Comparing the Effectiveness of Papain Based Chemico-mechanical Caries Removal Gel and 38% Silver Diamine Fluoride for Treating Active Caries Lesion of Primary Molars
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to investigate the efficacy of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) and Papain-based chemico-mechanical caries removal gel and using ceramic bur as a control in treating dentine caries in primary molars aged 7-8 years children. by investigating the following outcomes:
- 1.Arrestment of caries lesion and the emergence of a new one
- 2.Time required for the treatment
- 3.Adverse events
- 4.Children's anxiety
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 2, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 23, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2024
CompletedMay 8, 2025
May 1, 2025
5 months
April 25, 2024
May 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Adverse event
The following adverse events will be investigated: Pain, sensitivity, tooth discoloration, burning in the mouth, allergy altered taste of food, irritation of the gums or mucosa
during the first two weeks
Filling fellow up
The evaluation was done using the community periodontal index (CPI)-probe (WHO-probe) and a dental mirror. The treated lesions were classified according to the evaluation scores which were modified from those used by Francis et al.: score 1 - the restoration intact, covering all pits and fissures; score 2 - the restoration partially lost, the tooth is sound (no active/soft caries); score 3 - the restoration partially lost, the tooth is carious(active/soft caries); score 4 - the restoration completely lost, the tooth is sound; and score 5 - the restoration completely lost, the tooth is carious. The tooth was considered sound if its surface felt hard and shiny
after 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
anxiety level
immediately after the procedure
Time
This will take about from 5 to 30 minutes
Study Arms (3)
Ceramic bur (Cerabur) C
ACTIVE COMPARATORCera bur (Ceramic Bur) Komet, Lemgo, Germany
Silver Diamine Fluoride (e-SDF) S
ACTIVE COMPARATORe-SDF (SDF 38%) E-kids, India
CMCR gel (Brix3000) B
ACTIVE COMPARATORBrix3000 (Papain based gel) S.R.L., Argentina
Interventions
Dental caries removal using a low-speed handpiece and a ceramic bur and restoring the cavity with Glass ionomer filling material
Chemical-dissolving active dental caries and hand instrument used for removing the lesion then restoring with Glass ionomer filling material
Arresting the infected dentin and the demineralized lesion covered with Glass-ionomer filling
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Each child should have primary molars with open carious lesions, either on the occlusal surface or Proximal one with the absence of a neighboring tooth.
- These lesions should affect the dentin but not expose the pulp.
- The depth of the cavities should measure between 40-99 using a DIAGNOdent caries detection instrument for standardization
You may not qualify if:
- Children were excluded if parents were unwilling to be assigned to any of the approaches
- Children that had any abnormal medical condition or silver or papain allergy
- Chose molars with clinical or radiographic signals of pulp involvement
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
College of Dentistry, Mustansiriyah University
Baghdad, Al-karkh, 10011, Iraq
Related Publications (2)
Satyarup D, Mohanty S, Nagarajappa R, Mahapatra I, Dalai RP. Comparison of the effectiveness of 38% silver diamine fluoride and atraumatic restorative treatment for treating dental caries in a school setting: A randomized clinical trial. Dent Med Probl. 2022 Apr-Jun;59(2):217-223. doi: 10.17219/dmp/143547.
PMID: 35506381BACKGROUNDVollu AL, Rodrigues GF, Rougemount Teixeira RV, Cruz LR, Dos Santos Massa G, de Lima Moreira JP, Luiz RR, Barja-Fidalgo F, Fonseca-Goncalves A. Efficacy of 30% silver diamine fluoride compared to atraumatic restorative treatment on dentine caries arrestment in primary molars of preschool children: A 12-months parallel randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent. 2019 Sep;88:103165. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
PMID: 31279925BACKGROUND
Related Links
- Comparative Evaluation of 'Less Invasive Approach' of caries excavation and 'Only Arrest And No Excavation Approach' in dental caries management in primary molars- A Randomised Controlled Trial
- Evaluation of the Efficacy of Caries Removal Using Papain Gel (Brix 3000) and Smart Preparation Bur(in vivo Comparative Study)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- BDS
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2024
First Posted
May 14, 2024
Study Start
January 2, 2024
Primary Completion
May 23, 2024
Study Completion
July 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share