Influence of Insertion Torque and Bone Type on Post-operative Pain
Influence of High Insertion Torque and Type of Bone on Post-operative Pain and Survival Rate of Dental Implants
1 other identifier
interventional
230
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objectives of this clinical study were to assess the effect of different ITs and bone types on POP levels and survival rates and to investigate the effect of different patient- and site-related factors on POP levels and survival rates.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Dec 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2024
CompletedJuly 25, 2024
July 1, 2024
4.1 years
May 8, 2024
July 23, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-operative pain
Pain was assessed after surgery using the 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 "no pain" to 10 "worst pain ever." The scale has no other markings along the line. Patients will be asked to record their pain level before surgery and after surgery, 24 hours after surgery, at day 2, day 4 and at week 1, week 2, and week 3.
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Survival rate of implants
36 months
Study Arms (2)
Pain level
EXPERIMENTALAfter implant placement, all participants were requested to record their pain level using the 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 "no pain" to 10 "worst pain ever." The scale had no other markings along the line. Patients were asked to record their pain level after surgery, 24 hours after surgery, at day 2, day 4 and at week 1, week 2, and week 3.
Implant torque
EXPERIMENTALImplants were classified into 4 groups based on the IT value; Low: 58 implants (10-29 Ncm); Regular: 95 implants (30-50 Ncm); High: 46 implants (51-100 Ncm); and Very High: 31 implants (101-180 Ncm).
Interventions
All patients received a single Tapered Screw implant (Bioinnovation Dental®, Brazil). The implants were placed according to the manufacturer's instructions by using the appropriate burs with a final master drill of 3.5 or 4.5 mm in diameter by one senior oral surgeon. These implants were multi-threaded, and their surfaces were both sandblasted and acid etched. Of the 230 participants, 172 received a single 5 x 10-mm implant, and 58 received a 4 x 10-mm implant.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- partially edentulous patients who presented with one or more missing teeth in the maxillary or mandibular jaw
- at least18 years old, adequate oral hygiene
- absence of infection or periodontal problems adjacent to the implant site - sufficient bone thickness with a minimum 6-mm width and 12-mm length to accommodate implants of 4 or 5 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length.
You may not qualify if:
- uncontrolled diabetes
- hypertension
- pregnancy
- bone diseases
- use of bisphosphonates
- heavy smoker (more than 20 cigarettes /day)
- severe alcohol or drug use
- patients with recent extraction of teeth and patients requiring bone and soft tissue augmentation procedures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Sharjahlead
- Yarmouk Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Sharjah
Sharjah city, 7724, United Arab Emirates
Related Publications (10)
Al-Khabbaz AK, Griffin TJ, Al-Shammari KF. Assessment of pain associated with the surgical placement of dental implants. J Periodontol. 2007 Feb;78(2):239-46. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060032.
PMID: 17274712BACKGROUNDAlissa R, Sakka S, Oliver R, Horner K, Esposito M, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Influence of ibuprofen on bone healing around dental implants: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009 Autumn;2(3):185-99.
PMID: 20467629BACKGROUNDAugustin G, Davila S, Udilljak T, Staroveski T, Brezak D, Babic S. Temperature changes during cortical bone drilling with a newly designed step drill and an internally cooled drill. Int Orthop. 2012 Jul;36(7):1449-56. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1491-z.
PMID: 22290154BACKGROUNDBarewal RM, Oates TW, Meredith N, Cochran DL. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):641-51.
PMID: 14579951BACKGROUNDBarone A, Alfonsi F, Derchi G, Tonelli P, Toti P, Marchionni S, Covani U. The Effect of Insertion Torque on the Clinical Outcome of Single Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Jun;18(3):588-600. doi: 10.1111/cid.12337. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
PMID: 26043651BACKGROUNDBeaudette JR, Fritz PC, Sullivan PJ, Piccini A, Ward WE. Investigation of factors that influence pain experienced and the use of pain medication following periodontal surgery. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 May;45(5):578-585. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12885. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
PMID: 29500837BACKGROUNDBecker W, Becker BE, Hujoel P, Abu Ras Z, Goldstein M, Smidt A. Prospective clinical trial evaluating a new implant system for implant survival, implant stability and radiographic bone changes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Feb;15(1):15-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00333.x. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
PMID: 21223489BACKGROUNDBerardini M, Trisi P, Sinjari B, Rutjes AW, Caputi S. The Effects of High Insertion Torque Versus Low Insertion Torque on Marginal Bone Resorption and Implant Failure Rates: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses. Implant Dent. 2016 Aug;25(4):532-40. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000422.
PMID: 27129002BACKGROUNDBryce G, Bomfim DI, Bassi GS. Pre- and post-operative management of dental implant placement. Part 1: management of post-operative pain. Br Dent J. 2014 Aug;217(3):123-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.650.
PMID: 25104691BACKGROUNDCalandriello R, Tomatis M, Rangert B. Immediate functional loading of Branemark System implants with enhanced initial stability: a prospective 1- to 2-year clinical and radiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5 Suppl 1:10-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00011.x.
PMID: 12691646BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ahmed Aziz, PhD
University of Sharjah
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2024
First Posted
May 14, 2024
Study Start
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 20, 2023
Study Completion
February 15, 2024
Last Updated
July 25, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individuals data will not be shared, data required normally for publication will be shared upon reasonable request.