NCT06412380

Brief Summary

The objectives of this clinical study were to assess the effect of different ITs and bone types on POP levels and survival rates and to investigate the effect of different patient- and site-related factors on POP levels and survival rates.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
230

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2019

Completed
4.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 15, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 8, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 14, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 25, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

4.1 years

First QC Date

May 8, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 23, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Post-operative pain

    Pain was assessed after surgery using the 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 "no pain" to 10 "worst pain ever." The scale has no other markings along the line. Patients will be asked to record their pain level before surgery and after surgery, 24 hours after surgery, at day 2, day 4 and at week 1, week 2, and week 3.

    1 month

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Survival rate of implants

    36 months

Study Arms (2)

Pain level

EXPERIMENTAL

After implant placement, all participants were requested to record their pain level using the 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 "no pain" to 10 "worst pain ever." The scale had no other markings along the line. Patients were asked to record their pain level after surgery, 24 hours after surgery, at day 2, day 4 and at week 1, week 2, and week 3.

Procedure: Implant insertion

Implant torque

EXPERIMENTAL

Implants were classified into 4 groups based on the IT value; Low: 58 implants (10-29 Ncm); Regular: 95 implants (30-50 Ncm); High: 46 implants (51-100 Ncm); and Very High: 31 implants (101-180 Ncm).

Procedure: Implant insertion

Interventions

All patients received a single Tapered Screw implant (Bioinnovation Dental®, Brazil). The implants were placed according to the manufacturer's instructions by using the appropriate burs with a final master drill of 3.5 or 4.5 mm in diameter by one senior oral surgeon. These implants were multi-threaded, and their surfaces were both sandblasted and acid etched. Of the 230 participants, 172 received a single 5 x 10-mm implant, and 58 received a 4 x 10-mm implant.

Also known as: Implant surgery
Implant torquePain level

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • partially edentulous patients who presented with one or more missing teeth in the maxillary or mandibular jaw
  • at least18 years old, adequate oral hygiene
  • absence of infection or periodontal problems adjacent to the implant site - sufficient bone thickness with a minimum 6-mm width and 12-mm length to accommodate implants of 4 or 5 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length.

You may not qualify if:

  • uncontrolled diabetes
  • hypertension
  • pregnancy
  • bone diseases
  • use of bisphosphonates
  • heavy smoker (more than 20 cigarettes /day)
  • severe alcohol or drug use
  • patients with recent extraction of teeth and patients requiring bone and soft tissue augmentation procedures.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Sharjah

Sharjah city, 7724, United Arab Emirates

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Al-Khabbaz AK, Griffin TJ, Al-Shammari KF. Assessment of pain associated with the surgical placement of dental implants. J Periodontol. 2007 Feb;78(2):239-46. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060032.

    PMID: 17274712BACKGROUND
  • Alissa R, Sakka S, Oliver R, Horner K, Esposito M, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Influence of ibuprofen on bone healing around dental implants: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009 Autumn;2(3):185-99.

    PMID: 20467629BACKGROUND
  • Augustin G, Davila S, Udilljak T, Staroveski T, Brezak D, Babic S. Temperature changes during cortical bone drilling with a newly designed step drill and an internally cooled drill. Int Orthop. 2012 Jul;36(7):1449-56. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1491-z.

    PMID: 22290154BACKGROUND
  • Barewal RM, Oates TW, Meredith N, Cochran DL. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):641-51.

    PMID: 14579951BACKGROUND
  • Barone A, Alfonsi F, Derchi G, Tonelli P, Toti P, Marchionni S, Covani U. The Effect of Insertion Torque on the Clinical Outcome of Single Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Jun;18(3):588-600. doi: 10.1111/cid.12337. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

    PMID: 26043651BACKGROUND
  • Beaudette JR, Fritz PC, Sullivan PJ, Piccini A, Ward WE. Investigation of factors that influence pain experienced and the use of pain medication following periodontal surgery. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 May;45(5):578-585. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12885. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

    PMID: 29500837BACKGROUND
  • Becker W, Becker BE, Hujoel P, Abu Ras Z, Goldstein M, Smidt A. Prospective clinical trial evaluating a new implant system for implant survival, implant stability and radiographic bone changes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Feb;15(1):15-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00333.x. Epub 2011 Jan 11.

    PMID: 21223489BACKGROUND
  • Berardini M, Trisi P, Sinjari B, Rutjes AW, Caputi S. The Effects of High Insertion Torque Versus Low Insertion Torque on Marginal Bone Resorption and Implant Failure Rates: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses. Implant Dent. 2016 Aug;25(4):532-40. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000422.

    PMID: 27129002BACKGROUND
  • Bryce G, Bomfim DI, Bassi GS. Pre- and post-operative management of dental implant placement. Part 1: management of post-operative pain. Br Dent J. 2014 Aug;217(3):123-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.650.

    PMID: 25104691BACKGROUND
  • Calandriello R, Tomatis M, Rangert B. Immediate functional loading of Branemark System implants with enhanced initial stability: a prospective 1- to 2-year clinical and radiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5 Suppl 1:10-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00011.x.

    PMID: 12691646BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Ahmed Aziz, PhD

    University of Sharjah

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2024

First Posted

May 14, 2024

Study Start

December 1, 2019

Primary Completion

December 20, 2023

Study Completion

February 15, 2024

Last Updated

July 25, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individuals data will not be shared, data required normally for publication will be shared upon reasonable request.

Locations