The Effect of Hippotherapy Simulator in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Investıgatıon of the Effect of Hıppotherapy Sımulator on Lower Extremıty Selectıve Motor Control, Balance and Trunk Control in Chıldren Wıth Spastıc Cerebral Palsy
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The horseback riding simulator (HRS) is a dynamic robotic device that mimics the movement of a horse for hippotherapy purposes. HRS aims to improve the patient's balance, adaptation and provide postural adjustment by mimicking the rhythmic movements of the horse. This study aims to research the potential benefits of the horseback riding simulator on the lower extremity selective motor control, balance and trunk control in children with Cerebral palsy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 21, 2024
CompletedJanuary 15, 2025
February 1, 2024
9 months
May 5, 2024
January 13, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
Assessing functional level and gross motor function of children with CP. Level I refers to a child walking independently, while level V refers to mobility with a wheelchair.
At Baseline
Manuel ability classification system (MACS)
Classify how children with CP use their hands when dealing with objects in daily activities. It is a 5-level classification scale. The higher the level, the worse the manual ability. Level 1 means that objects can be handled and used easily and successfully. Level 5 refers to being unable to handle and use objects and having severely limited ability to perform even simple activities.
At Baseline
Change from Baseline Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity at 8 weeks
Evaluates the lower extremity selective motor control of individuals with CP. The scale assesses five joints separately and bilaterally: hip, knee, ankle, subtalar joint and toe. The degree of selective motor control is determined for each joint as 'normal' (2 points), 'impaired' (1 point) or 'unable to perform' (0 points), according to the patient's ability to perform the movements. The total score is obtained by summing the scores from the joint levels for each limb, with a maximum score of 10 points. Low scores indicate poor selective motor control.
Change from Baseline at 8 weeks
Change from Baseline Pediatric balance scale at 8 weeks
Assesses the balance of children with CP. This scale consists of 14 items, each of which is scored from 0 to 4. A score of 0 indicates that he/she cannot carry out the instruction and a score of 4 indicates that he/she can do it without difficulty. The total score ranges from 0-56. A low total score indicates a decrease in balance function.
Change from Baseline at 8 weeks
Change from Baseline Trunk Control Measurement Scale at 8 weeks
This scale consists of two main parts, dynamic and static sitting balance, and provides an assessment. The scale consists of 15 items. Items are scored as 0, 1, 2 or 3. The minimum score that can be obtained from the scale is 0 and the maximum score is 58. A higher score indicates better trunk control.
Change from Baseline at 8 weeks
Change from Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) at 8 weeks
This scale is the most widely used clinical scale to assess spasticity. It is a 6-point scale that assesses muscle tone by passively moving the joint through the normal range of possible motion and recording resistance to passive movement. The scoring ranges from 0-5. There is no tonus increase at 0. 5 indicates that the affected limb is rigid. The higher the score, the greater the increase in tonus.
Change from Baseline at 8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group (Horseback riding simulator+Routine physiotherapy)
EXPERIMENTALHorseback riding simulator (HRS) will be applied in addition to routine Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation. This group will receive 20 minutes of routine physiotherapy training and 20 minutes of HRS application in addition to 2 sessions per week for 8 weeks.
Control group (Routine physiotherapy)
ACTIVE COMPARATORRoutine physiotherapy training will be applied within a specific programme for 40 minutes in 2 sessions per week for 8 weeks.
Interventions
Horseback riding simulator (HRS) will be applied in addition to routine Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation.
Routine Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation within a spesific programme
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of Spastic Cerebral Palsy
- Voluntary participation
- Age between 5-17 years,
- GMFCS Level I-II-III
- MACS Level I-II-III
- Modified Asworth Scale (MAS) Level 1-2-3
- Have the ability to sit with support
You may not qualify if:
- Having severe visual and hearing problems
- Severe distractibility problems and inability to follow task instructions,
- Not voluntary to participate in the research,
- Individuals with CP who have had hip or spine surgery in the last 6 months
- Individuals with CP who have undergone Botox in the last 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gaziantep
Gaziantep, 27100, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yalçın Karabulut
Hasan Kalyoncu University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2024
First Posted
May 8, 2024
Study Start
February 20, 2024
Primary Completion
November 20, 2024
Study Completion
November 21, 2024
Last Updated
January 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share