NCT06403020

Brief Summary

In this study we will compare the effectiveness of quadratus lumborum block and rectus sheath block in postoperative pain management after paraumbilical hernia repair

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 3, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 3, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 7, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 15, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 11, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

May 3, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 10, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

quadratus lumborum blockrectus sheath block

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual analogue score

    Postoperative pain

    The first 24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Age

    1 year

Study Arms (2)

Group Q

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group Q (n=23) will have a qadratus lumboroum (QL) block.

Procedure: Block

Group R

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group R (n=23) will have a rectus sheath (RS) block.

Procedure: Block

Interventions

BlockPROCEDURE

qadratus lumboroum (QL) block

Group QGroup R

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients 18-60 years old,
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I, Ⅱ,
  • both sexes who will have PUH surgical repair under general anesthesia.

You may not qualify if:

  • Known allergy to any of the drugs that will be used in the study.
  • Coagulation disorders.
  • Infection at the site of injection.
  • Liver or kidney disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fayoum University Hospital

Al Fayyum, 63511, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Karaarslan E, Topal A, Avci O, Tuncer Uzun S. Research on the efficacy of the rectus sheath block method. Agri. 2018 Oct;30(4):183-188. doi: 10.5505/agri.2018.86619.

  • Elsharkawy H, El-Boghdadly K, Barrington M. Quadratus Lumborum Block: Anatomical Concepts, Mechanisms, and Techniques. Anesthesiology. 2019 Feb;130(2):322-335. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002524. No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Dental Occlusion

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DentistryDental Physiological PhenomenaDigestive System and Oral Physiological Phenomena

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: In this randomized double blinded study, patients will be allocated randomly into two groups by a computer generated sequence using closed envelope method. Group Q (n=23) will have qadratus lumboroum (QL) block. Group R (n=23) will have rectus sheath (RS) block.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2024

First Posted

May 7, 2024

Study Start

May 3, 2024

Primary Completion

November 15, 2024

Study Completion

December 15, 2024

Last Updated

March 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

no plan to share

Locations