Ultrasound-guided Cervical Medial Branch Blocks
A Prospective Evaluation of the Safety and Clinical Effects of Ultrasound-guided Cervical Medial Branch Blocks
1 other identifier
observational
500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study we will prospectively examine the safety and clinical effects of ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2021
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 12, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 5, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2023
CompletedNovember 29, 2023
November 1, 2023
2.4 years
April 12, 2021
November 27, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Immediate complications
Proportion of patients with immediate block-related complications including any of the following: vasovagal, local anesthetic toxicity (dizziness, tinnitus, altered LOC, seizure) and trauma to non-targeted neural structures (paresthesia or other neuro symptoms)
Immediately after block
Delayed complications
Proportion of patients with delayed block-related complications including any of the following: redness/irritation/swelling at injection site, hematoma, infection, skin bruising, soreness at injection site or increased pain, any neurological symptoms (new onset radicular pain, numbness/weakness or paresthesia in upper extremities).
14 days after block
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Patient reported pain
Pre-block, then every 2 weeks for 3 months.
NDI
Pre-block, then every 2 weeks for 3 months.
PHQ-9
Pre-block then at 1,2 and 3 months post block.
GAD-7
Pre-block then at 1,2 and 3 months post block.
PCS
Pre-block then at 1,2 and 3 months post block.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Block
Patients undergoing ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks as part of their usual care
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients presenting to a tertiary outpatient pain clinic for diagnosis and treatment of chronic neck pain
You may qualify if:
- Consenting patients over 18 years of age undergoing cervical medial branch blocks as part of their usual care and who have a pain intensity of at least 5/10 (at rest or on movement) and a pain duration of at least 4 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to communicate or complete follow up questionnaires
- Known bleeding disorder or coagulopathy
- Patients on antiplatelet medication other than aspirin and those on anticoagulants (coumadin, AT III agents)
- Inability to visualize targeted structures on ultrasound
- Presence of acute radiculopathy of new onset neurological symptoms in the upper extremities
- Patients with bilateral neck pain if only one side is treated
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bill Nelems Pain and Research Centre
Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y 0G1, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Finlayson RJ, Etheridge JB, Godard R, Kaseweter K, Etheridge JP, Curatolo M. Do cervical medial branch blocks have a therapeutic role? a prospective cohort study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 May 28:rapm-2025-106457. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2025-106457. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 40441772DERIVEDEtheridge JB, Finlayson RJ, Venter J, De Villiers F, Etheridge JP, Wakefield R, Watanitanon A. Prospective evaluation of the safety of ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks using the in-plane technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Mar 5;50(3):237-242. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105296.
PMID: 38508589DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roderick J Finlayson, MD
University of British Columbia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John-Paul B Etheridge, MD
University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 12, 2021
First Posted
April 21, 2021
Study Start
May 5, 2021
Primary Completion
October 1, 2023
Study Completion
October 1, 2023
Last Updated
November 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share