NCT06398327

Brief Summary

One of the main goals of pediatric dentistry is to preserve the functions and structures of primary teeth until the time of exfoliation. Especially carious lesions are the main factor in the early loss of primary teeth. Today, primary teeth can be kept in the mouth by applying different treatments depending on the degree of inflammation caused by carious lesions in the pulp tissue.Coronal pulpotomy application in asymptomatic primary teeth with deep carious lesions near the pulp is one of the most common methods to achieve the goal of retaining the tooth in place. The purpose of the pulpotomy technique is to remove the affected pulp tissue and maintain the normal function of the unaffected root pulp tissue until the tooth is naturally ready to exfoliate. Studies have shown that the degree of pulp inflammation and the materials used are effective in the success of this treatment. In studies evaluating pulpal inflammation, many biomarkers have been shown to play significant roles at different levels of inflammation. Recently, Presepsin has been studied as a biomarker for detecting bacterial infections. However, there is no study in the literature on the use of Presepsin as a biomarker in endodontic treatments. In our study, it is thought that Presepsin biomarker could be detected in cases of acute or chronic infection in pulp tissue and could be considered as one of the mediators of pulpal inflammation. Based on this, the aim of our study is to investigate whether the materials used in covering the pulp or the level of inflammation in the remaining pulp tissue is more important for the success of pulpotomy treatment. The inflammation level in the remaining pulp tissue will be measured using IL-6, IL-8, and Presepsin. Then, the one-year success of treatment in different groups where pulp tissue is randomly covered with MTA, NeoMTA, Biodentine, and Zinc oxide eugenol will be demonstrated. Thus, it will be evaluated whether materials previously found to be quite successful in other studies achieve success in pulps with high inflammation levels.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 5, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 5, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 17, 2023

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 7, 2024

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 3, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 3, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

April 7, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 30, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

PresepsinMTANeo MTABiodentinezinc oxide eugenolıl-6IL-8Pulpal inflammationPulpotomy treatmentPrimary molar teeth

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Clinical Success After Pulpotomy Treatment

    No signs of abscess or any swelling related to the tooth, no signs of fistula or other pathology, no signs of pathologic mobility, no post-operative pain, no pain on palpation or percussion of the tooth.

    6 Month - 1 Year

  • Radiographic Success After Pulpotomy Treatment

    No signs of root resorption (internal or external), no signs of furcation involvement or periapical radiolucency, no signs of loss of lamina dura, presence of normal appearance of periodontal ligament space.

    6 Month - 1 Year

  • IL-6 amount measurement using ELISA kit

    IL-6 levels were measured in ng/ml using the ELISA method. The measurement procedure was followed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The anti-IL-6 polyclonal antibody was pre-coated on 96-well plates. Blood samples and a biotin-conjugated antibody were added to the wells supplemented with Avidin-Biotin-Peroxidase Complex and 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine in a mildly acidic buffer. A blue-colored product was produced and turned to yellow after an acidic stop solution was added. The intensity of the color yellow was proportional to the IL-6 amount bound on the plate. The optical density absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 450nm in a microplate reader and the concentration of IL-6 was calculated. For the expression of IL-6 concentrations in the samples, a standard curve was used.Optimal threshold values (cut-offs) for biomarkers were determined based on sensitivity and specificity, which were calculated from a ROC curve.

    6 Month - 1 Year

  • IL-8 amount measurement using ELISA kit

    IL-8 levels were measured in ng/ml using the ELISA method. The measurement procedure was followed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The anti-IL-8 polyclonal antibody was pre-coated on 96-well plates. Blood samples and a biotin-conjugated antibody were added to the wells supplemented with Avidin-Biotin-Peroxidase Complex and 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine in a mildly acidic buffer. A blue-colored product was produced and turned to yellow after an acidic stop solution was added. The intensity of the color yellow was proportional to the IL-8 amount bound on the plate. The optical density absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 450nm in a microplate reader and the concentration of IL-8 was calculated. For the expression of IL-8 concentrations in the samples, a standard curve was used.Optimal threshold values (cut-offs) for biomarkers were determined based on sensitivity and specificity, which were calculated from a ROC curve.

    6 Month - 1 Year

  • Presepsin amount measurement using ELISA kit

    Presepsin levels were measured in ng/ml using the ELISA method. The measurement procedure was followed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The anti-Presepsin polyclonal antibody was pre-coated on 96-well plates. Blood samples and a biotin-conjugated antibody were added to the wells supplemented with Avidin-Biotin-Peroxidase Complex and 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine in a mildly acidic buffer. A blue-colored product was produced and turned to yellow after an acidic stop solution was added. The intensity of the color yellow was proportional to the Presepsin amount bound on the plate. The optical density absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 450nm in a microplate reader and the concentration of Presepsin was calculated. For the expression of Presepsin concentrations in the samples, a standard curve was used.Optimal threshold values (cut-offs) for biomarkers were determined based on sensitivity and specificity, which were calculated from a ROC curve.

    6 Month - 1 Year

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • The Correlation Between Pre-Treatment Pain Presence and Radiographic Success After Pulpotomy Treatment

    1 Year

  • The Correlation Between The Severity of Pulp Bleeding During Treatment and Radiographic Success After Pulpotomy Treatment

    1 Year

  • The Correlation Between Pulp Bleeding Time During Treatment and Radiographic Success After Pulpotomy Treatment

    1 Year

Study Arms (4)

Zinc oxide eugenol cement

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

During pulpotomy treatment, a blood sample was taken from the coronal pulp and stored. The remaining pulp tissue was covered with ZOE, randomly selected from among four material groups. The teeth treated with ZOE were monitored for 12 months. Subsequently, the levels of IL-6, IL-8, and Presepsin in the blood were measured using the ELISA method and noted in ng/ml. Thus, the effect of the material used on the success of the treatment was determined based on the level of pulpal inflammation before treatment.

Procedure: PULPOTOMY TREATMENT

Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

During pulpotomy treatment, a blood sample was taken from the coronal pulp and stored. The remaining pulp tissue was covered with MTA, randomly selected from among four material groups. The teeth treated with MTA were monitored for 12 months. Subsequently, the levels of IL-6, IL-8, and Presepsin in the blood were measured using the ELISA method and noted in ng/ml. Thus, the effect of the material used on the success of the treatment was determined based on the level of pulpal inflammation before treatment.

Procedure: PULPOTOMY TREATMENT

NeoMTA (newly developed mta)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

During pulpotomy treatment, a blood sample was taken from the coronal pulp and stored. The remaining pulp tissue was covered with NeoMTA, randomly selected from among four material groups. The teeth treated with NeoMTA were monitored for 12 months. Subsequently, the levels of IL-6, IL-8, and Presepsin in the blood were measured using the ELISA method and noted in ng/ml. Thus, the effect of the material used on the success of the treatment was determined based on the level of pulpal inflammation before treatment.

Procedure: PULPOTOMY TREATMENT

Biodentine (biomaterial)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

During pulpotomy treatment, a blood sample was taken from the coronal pulp and stored. The remaining pulp tissue was covered with Biodentine, randomly selected from among four material groups. The teeth treated with Biodentine were monitored for 12 months. Subsequently, the levels of IL-6, IL-8, and Presepsin in the blood were measured using the ELISA method and noted in ng/ml. Thus, the effect of the material used on the success of the treatment was determined based on the level of pulpal inflammation before treatment.

Procedure: PULPOTOMY TREATMENT

Interventions

During pulpotomy treatment, a bleeding sample was taken from the pulp and levels of presepsin, IL-6 and IL-8, which are important inflammation markers, were determined. During the treatment, MTA, Neo MTA, Biodentine and ZOE groups were randomly selected and the remaining pulp tissue was covered. After pulpotomy treatment, the teeth were followed for one year. Treatment success was evaluated according to the material used in teeth with high levels of inflammation at the beginning.

Biodentine (biomaterial)Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)NeoMTA (newly developed mta)Zinc oxide eugenol cement

Eligibility Criteria

Age4 Years - 9 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy children between the ages of 6-9
  • Children who do not have any systemic disease
  • Primary second premolars in which physiological root resorption has not started.
  • Cases where tooth decay at the interfaces exceeds ½ of the dentin thickness.
  • Primary second premolars with provoked pain
  • \. Lack of percussion sensitivity 5. Absence of radiolucent image in the periapical and furcal areas on x-ray 6. Clinical absence of abscess and fistula

You may not qualify if:

  • Children with systemic diseases
  • Having percussion sensitivity
  • Radiolucent appearance in the periapical and furcal areas on x-ray
  • Clinical presence of fistula
  • Having night pain

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ataturk University Faculty of Dentistry

Yakutiye, Erzurum, 25240, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (28)

  • Ahuja S, Surabhi K, Gandhi K, Kapoor R, Malhotra R, Kumar D. Comparative Evaluation of Success of Biodentine and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate with Formocresol as Pulpotomy Medicaments in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Mar-Apr;13(2):167-173. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1740.

  • Alsanouni M, Bawazir OA. A Randomized Clinical Trial of NeoMTA Plus in Primary Molar Pulpotomies. Pediatr Dent. 2019 Mar 15;41(2):107-111.

  • Bani M, Aktas N, Cinar C, Odabas ME. The Clinical and Radiographic Success of Primary Molar Pulpotomy Using Biodentine and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A 24-Month Randomized Clinical Trial. Pediatr Dent. 2017 Jul 15;39(4):284-288.

  • Bossu M, Iaculli F, Di Giorgio G, Salucci A, Polimeni A, Di Carlo S. Different Pulp Dressing Materials for the Pulpotomy of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 19;9(3):838. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030838.

  • Cordell S, Kratunova E, Marion I, Alrayyes S, Alapati SB. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Success of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Ferric Sulfate as Pulpotomy Medicaments for Primary Molars. J Dent Child (Chic). 2021 May 15;88(2):120-128.

  • Cuadros-Fernandez C, Lorente Rodriguez AI, Saez-Martinez S, Garcia-Binimelis J, About I, Mercade M. Short-term treatment outcome of pulpotomies in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Sep;20(7):1639-45. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1656-4. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

  • Donnermeyer D, Dammaschke T, Lipski M, Schafer E. Effectiveness of diagnosing pulpitis: A systematic review. Int Endod J. 2023 Oct;56 Suppl 3:296-325. doi: 10.1111/iej.13762. Epub 2022 May 25.

  • Elsalhy M, Azizieh F, Raghupathy R. Cytokines as diagnostic markers of pulpal inflammation. Int Endod J. 2013 Jun;46(6):573-80. doi: 10.1111/iej.12030. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

  • Farges JC, Keller JF, Carrouel F, Durand SH, Romeas A, Bleicher F, Lebecque S, Staquet MJ. Odontoblasts in the dental pulp immune response. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2009 Jul 15;312B(5):425-36. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.21259.

  • Gonzalez-Lara A, Ruiz-Rodriguez MS, Pierdant-Perez M, Garrocho-Rangel JA, Pozos-Guillen AJ. Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Pulpotomy in Primary Teeth: A 24-Month Follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):107-12. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.2.107.

  • Gopinath VK, Anwar K. Histological evaluation of pulp tissue from second primary molars correlated with clinical and radiographic caries findings. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Mar;11(2):199-203.

  • Guo J, Zhang N, Cheng Y. Comparative efficacy of medicaments or techniques for pulpotomy of primary molars: a network meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jan;27(1):91-104. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04830-1. Epub 2022 Dec 29.

  • Hirsch V, Wolgin M, Mitronin AV, Kielbassa AM. Inflammatory cytokines in normal and irreversibly inflamed pulps: A systematic review. Arch Oral Biol. 2017 Oct;82:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

  • Juneja P, Kulkarni S. Clinical and radiographic comparison of biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulpotomy agents in primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2017 Aug;18(4):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s40368-017-0299-3. Epub 2017 Aug 5.

  • Matsuo T, Nakanishi T, Shimizu H, Ebisu S. A clinical study of direct pulp capping applied to carious-exposed pulps. J Endod. 1996 Oct;22(10):551-6. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80017-3.

  • Memar MY, Baghi HB. Presepsin: A promising biomarker for the detection of bacterial infections. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019 Mar;111:649-656. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.124. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

  • Michaelson PL, Holland GR. Is pulpitis painful? Int Endod J. 2002 Oct;35(10):829-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00579.x.

  • Ng FK, Messer LB. Mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulpotomy medicament: an evidence-based assessment. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2008 Jun;9(2):58-73. doi: 10.1007/BF03262612.

  • Ozdemir Y, Kutukculer N, Topaloglu-Ak A, Kose T, Eronat C. Comparative evaluation of pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in pulpotomized primary molars. J Oral Sci. 2015 Jun;57(2):145-50. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.57.145.

  • Pratima B, Chandan GD, Nidhi T, Nitish I, Sankriti M, Nagaveni S, Shweta S. Postoperative assessment of diode laser zinc oxide eugenol and mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy procedures in children: A comparative clinical study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2018 Jul-Sep;36(3):308-314. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_1132_17.

  • Shafaee H, Alirezaie M, Rangrazi A, Bardideh E. Comparison of the success rate of a bioactive dentin substitute with those of other root restoration materials in pulpotomy of primary teeth: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2019 Aug;150(8):676-688. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Jun 13.

  • Smail-Faugeron V, Glenny AM, Courson F, Durieux P, Muller-Bolla M, Fron Chabouis H. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 31;5(5):CD003220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003220.pub3.

  • Sorsa T, Gursoy UK, Nwhator S, Hernandez M, Tervahartiala T, Leppilahti J, Gursoy M, Kononen E, Emingil G, Pussinen PJ, Mantyla P. Analysis of matrix metalloproteinases, especially MMP-8, in gingival creviclular fluid, mouthrinse and saliva for monitoring periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000. 2016 Feb;70(1):142-63. doi: 10.1111/prd.12101.

  • Stringhini Junior E, Dos Santos MGC, Oliveira LB, Mercade M. MTA and biodentine for primary teeth pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1967-1976. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2616-6. Epub 2018 Sep 20.

  • Xavier MT, Costa AL, Caramelo FJ, Palma PJ, Ramos JC. Evaluation of the Interfaces between Restorative and Regenerative Biomaterials Used in Vital Pulp Therapy. Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 3;14(17):5055. doi: 10.3390/ma14175055.

  • Zehnder M, Delaleu N, Du Y, Bickel M. Cytokine gene expression--part of host defence in pulpitis. Cytokine. 2003 May;22(3-4):84-8. doi: 10.1016/s1043-4666(03)00116-9.

  • Zou Q, Wen W, Zhang XC. Presepsin as a novel sepsis biomarker. World J Emerg Med. 2014;5(1):16-9. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2014.01.002.

  • Bas A, Derelioglu SS, Laloglu E. Efficacy of proinflamatory cytokines in the clinical and radiograpic outcomes of different primary molar pulpotomy agents: a comperative randomised study featuring a novel biomarker for pulpal diagnosis. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 15;24(1):1227. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04972-6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental Pulp Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • AYBİKE BAŞ

    Ataturk University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
assisstant proffessor- pediatric dentistry

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2024

First Posted

May 3, 2024

Study Start

November 5, 2021

Primary Completion

November 5, 2022

Study Completion

May 17, 2023

Last Updated

May 3, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations