Comparison of Short-term Outcomes of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients With Different Body Mass Index for Mid and Low Rectal Cancer

NCT06396975 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: Northjiangsu020
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 1,413
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Numerous comparison studies on the outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer have been undertaken and reported. But there aren't many studies that compare the safety and effectiveness of the two surgery procedures used to treat people with mid and low rectal cancer who have different body mass indexes (BMIs). This study was done to organize the clinical data we had at our hospital so we could compare the perioperative effectiveness of two minimally invasive approaches for people with different BMIs.

Conditions

Rectal Cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

• Oncological outcomes

  Oncological outcomes

  2019-2023

• the frequency of complications

  the frequency of complications

  2019-2023

Study Arms (2)

laparoscopic surgery

Procedure: robotic surgery

robotic surgery

Procedure: robotic surgery

Interventions

robotic surgery PROCEDURE

robotic surgery

laparoscopic surgery; robotic surgery

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 90 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The clinical records of patients who had laparoscopic or robotic proctectomy at Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital between December 2019 and August 2023 were analyzed in order to conduct research utilizing a retrospective research technique.

You may not qualify if:

• a high tumor location that was more than 10 centimeters away from the anal margin; surgery was unsuccessful in completing anal preservation due to invasion of the external anal sphincter; cancerous obstruction or perforation; severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction classified as stage IV according to the ASA score; and poor preoperative anal function; any resection that is performed in combination, rather than being a R0 resection.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Daorong Wang: lead

Study Sites (1)

Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital

Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225001, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rectal Neoplasms

Interventions

Robotic Surgical Procedures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colorectal Neoplasms; Intestinal Neoplasms; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Digestive System Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Neoplasms; Digestive System Diseases; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Intestinal Diseases; Rectal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Surgery, Computer-Assisted; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Robotics; Automation; Technology; Technology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: CASE CROSSOVER
• Time Perspective: RETROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Dr

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: April 29, 2024
• First Posted: May 2, 2024
• Study Start: January 1, 2019
• Primary Completion: April 29, 2023
• Study Completion: April 29, 2024
• Last Updated: May 2, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

CN (1)