NCT06395922|Unknown
Loading search results
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Study Start
February 6, 2024
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 1, 2024
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
June 1, 2024
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
This study aimed to compare the performance and safety profiles of two supraglottic airway devices (SADs), the Blockbuster laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and the Baska Mask (BM), in patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
June 1, 2024
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
February 6, 2024
Actual (reported)April 27, 2024
Actual (reported)May 2, 2024
Actual (reported)June 1, 2024
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
June 1, 2024
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Oropharyngeal leak pressure
Oropharyngeal leak pressure was measured Just after insertion and 30 min after insertion.
30 min after insertion
Device insertion time
5 min after insertion
The incidence of successful gastric tube placement
10 min after insertion
Complications
24 hours postoperatively
The LMA was inserted using the recommended technique, with the patient's head in the sniffing position. The appropriate size was selected based on body weight (size 3 for 30-50 kg, size 4 for 50-70 kg).
The BM was inserted by opening the mouth, avoiding the tongue, and negotiating the palatopharyngeal curve using the hand-tab.
The LMA was inserted using the recommended technique, with the patient's head in the sniffing position. The appropriate size was selected based on body weight (size 3 for 30-50 kg, size 4 for 50-70 kg)
The BM was inserted by opening the mouth, avoiding the tongue, and negotiating the palatopharyngeal curve using the hand-tab.
Tanta University
Tanta, El-Gharbia, 31527, Egypt
First Submitted
April 27, 2024
First Posted
May 2, 2024
Study Start
February 6, 2024
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 1, 2024
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
June 1, 2024
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Last Updated
May 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: