Blockbuster LMA Versus Baska Mask in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aimed to compare the performance and safety profiles of two supraglottic airway devices (SADs), the Blockbuster laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and the Baska Mask (BM), in patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 6, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2024
CompletedMay 2, 2024
May 1, 2024
4 months
April 27, 2024
May 1, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oropharyngeal leak pressure
Oropharyngeal leak pressure was measured Just after insertion and 30 min after insertion.
30 min after insertion
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Device insertion time
5 min after insertion
The incidence of successful gastric tube placement
10 min after insertion
Complications
24 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Blockbuster LMA (Group BL)
EXPERIMENTALThe LMA was inserted using the recommended technique, with the patient's head in the sniffing position. The appropriate size was selected based on body weight (size 3 for 30-50 kg, size 4 for 50-70 kg).
Baska Mask (Group BM)
EXPERIMENTALThe BM was inserted by opening the mouth, avoiding the tongue, and negotiating the palatopharyngeal curve using the hand-tab.
Interventions
The LMA was inserted using the recommended technique, with the patient's head in the sniffing position. The appropriate size was selected based on body weight (size 3 for 30-50 kg, size 4 for 50-70 kg)
The BM was inserted by opening the mouth, avoiding the tongue, and negotiating the palatopharyngeal curve using the hand-tab.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18-60 years
- Both sexes.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II.
- Scheduled for elective LC under general anesthesia.
You may not qualify if:
- Anticipated difficult airway.
- Renal dysfunction.
- Hiatus hernia.
- Obesity.
- Pregnancy.
- Patients taking rate-controlling medications, steroids, opioids, or regular antacids.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tanta Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Tanta University
Tanta, El-Gharbia, 31527, Egypt
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2024
First Posted
May 2, 2024
Study Start
February 6, 2024
Primary Completion
June 1, 2024
Study Completion
June 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- After the end of study for one year.
- Access Criteria
- The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.
The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.