Sponsor study identifier
observational
1
1 country
1
Study Start
March 1, 2024
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
April 1, 2024
Actual (reported)Study Completion
April 26, 2024
Actual (reported)One of the leading elements in providing safe healthcare is to maintain employee health and safety. Hazards in the working environments of healthcare professionals threaten employee safety and cause errors in patient care. In this case, healthcare professionals working in a safe environment means that patients receive service in a safe environment. Safety climate is the perception of employees of the policies, procedures and practices that exist to ensure safety in the workplace and is an important element for the formation of a safety culture in the workplace. There are many factors that determine the perception of safety climate. These factors can be listed as the type and size of the organization, the occupational risks that employees are exposed to at work, the way occupational safety is managed, the gender, seniority of employees, and their position in the organization.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
April 26, 2024
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
March 1, 2024
Actual (reported)April 1, 2024
Actual (reported)April 26, 2024
Actual (reported)April 27, 2024
Actual (reported)May 1, 2024
Actual (reported)Safety Climate Scale:
Since a customized safety climate perception measurement tool for nurses could not be found in the literature, the "Safety Climate Scale" (SAS), developed by Choudry et al. in 2009 and adapted to Turkish by Türen et al. in 2014, was used on healthcare workers and electronics industry workers. The scale consists of two subscales: 10 items evaluating the management's perspective and rules (YÖBAK) and 4 items evaluating colleagues and safety training (İAGE). Participants rate the statements in the scale between "strongly agree" (five points) and "strongly disagree" (one point). The total score of the scale is calculated by taking the average of the item scores, and as the average gets closer to five, the safety climate improves, and as it gets closer to one, it gets worse. The Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was determined as 0.93 in the study conducted by Türen et al., and in this study it was calculated as 0.82.
up to 4 weeks
Safety Climate Scale: Since a customized safety climate perception measurement tool for nurses could not be found in the literature, the "Safety Climate Scale" (SAS), developed by Choudry et al. in 2009 and adapted to Turkish by Türen et al. in 2014, was used on healthcare workers and electronics industry workers. The scale consists of two subscales: 10 items evaluating the management's perspective and rules (YÖBAK) and 4 items evaluating colleagues and safety training (İAGE). Participants rate the statements in the scale between "strongly agree" (five points) and "strongly disagree" (one point). The total score of the scale is calculated by taking the average of the item scores, and as the average gets closer to five, the safety climate improves, and as it gets closer to one, it gets worse. The Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was determined as 0.93 in the study conducted by Türen et al., and in this study it was calculated as 0.82.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Application of Research The research was conducted using an online survey. Operating room nurses were invited to the survey link via e-mail, and participation in the survey was voluntary. The survey includes socio-demographic information and the Security Climate Scale. The survey took approximately 15-20 minutes to complete.
Islam
Kilis, 79100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Kübra KAYA, PhD
devlet hastanesi
1 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
April 27, 2024
First Posted
May 1, 2024
Study Start
March 1, 2024
Actual (reported)Do the Health Education Materials Developed in the Gynecology and Diseases Nursing Course Affect Students' Teaching Material Motivation and Material Design Self-Efficacy Beliefs?
The Effect of Standardised Patient Simulation in Nursing Education
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
April 1, 2024
Actual (reported)Study Completion
April 26, 2024
Actual (reported)Last Updated
May 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: