RObotic-assisted Versus Conventional Knee Endoprosthetic Techniques
ROCKETS
ROCKETS: RObotic-assisted Versus Conventional Knee Endoprosthetic Techniques in a Randomized, Multicenter, Preference-tolerant Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
250
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale for conducting the study: The study aims to systematically evaluate the clinical and economic impacts of Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Replacement (RTKR) compared to conventional Total Knee Replacement (TKR). It focuses on the potential benefits of RTKR, including improved precision in surgery, potentially leading to better patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. Our primary endpoint is the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), aimed at measuring patients awareness of their knee joint in everyday life, indicating the success of the knee replacement surgery in restoring natural joint function. Secondary endpoints include patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), patient activity levels, the accuracy of implant positioning on x-ray, and the incidence of adverse events. Study design: Multicentre,, preference-tolerant, randomized, controlled, superiority trial with two treatment arms that compares the outcomes of RTKR with traditional TKR techniques. Study population: Adult patients aged 18 years and older who are eligible for TKR as per local guidelines and who have given informed consent to participate in the study. Number of patients: 400 Inclusion criteria: Patients must be adults aged 18 years and older, eligible for TKR according to local guidelines, and willing to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria: Patients with extreme malalignment requiring special implants or techniques, patients unfit for surgery due to medical reasons, and those deemed unsuitable to participate in the study for other reasons. Primary outcome variables: The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) at 2 years after surgery
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2028
April 29, 2024
April 1, 2024
2.8 years
April 4, 2024
April 26, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)
The primary outcome measurement will be the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), measured at 24 months post-surgery. The FJS evaluates the patient's ability to 'forget' the artificial joint in their daily life. This scale ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the maximum joint awareness and 100 represents complete joint unawareness, indicating that the patient does not perceive the joint during daily activities. Higher scores indicate a better outcome, reflecting the success of the knee replacement surgery in restoring natural joint function such that the joint feels like a natural part of the body.
24 months post surgery
Secondary Outcomes (6)
KOOS
preop, 6 weeks, 12 and 24 months post surgery
ADLS knee instability
6 weeks, 12 and 24 months post-operation.
The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)
6 weeks and 12 months post surgery
EQ-5D
6 weeks, 12 and 24 months post surgery
Knee alignment
6 weeks post surgery
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
RTKR
EXPERIMENTALRobotic assisted total knee replacement (RTKR)
TKR
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard total knee replacement (TKR)
Interventions
Total knee replacement (control group)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 years and older.
- Eligible for TKR according to local guidelines and routines.
- Willingness to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with extreme malalignment necessitating special implants or techniques.
- Patients unfit for surgery due to other medical reasons.
- Patients who, for other reason such as alcohol or substance abuse, is deemed unsuitable to participate in the study.
- Patients who, for other reasons can't fulfill the required patient recorded outcome measures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Danderyd Hospitallead
- Karolinska Institutetcollaborator
- Stockholm South General Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Danderyds Sjukhus
Stockholm, 18288, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2024
First Posted
April 29, 2024
Study Start
March 4, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2028
Last Updated
April 29, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share