CAS vs Standard Technique in TKA: Comparison of Clinical and Functional Results
CAS-K
CAS vs Tecnica Chirurgica Standard Nella Protesi Totale di Ginocchio: Confronto Dei Risultati Clinico-funzionali
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study involves the enrollment of a sample of patients with indication for total knee replacement surgery in order to compare the conventional surgical technique currently used in the reference departments with the surgical technique with the aid of computer-assisted navigation. The comparison between the two techniques will be performed in terms of clinical-functional results, perioperative bleeding and healthcare costs (surgical time, hospital stay). The research protocol involves the participation of 160 total patients divided into two groups, of 80 patients each, by type of surgical technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 12, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 12, 2026
September 22, 2025
September 1, 2025
2.5 years
September 10, 2024
September 19, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Knee Society Score (KSS)
Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KSS): there are 2 section, "Knee Score" section and a "Functional Score" section; both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions
From enrollment to 12 months post-operative followup
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Set of standardized questionnaires used by health professionals to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip, including pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints. The score measures five items for pain (score range 0-20), two for stiffness (score range 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
from enrollment to 12 months post-operative followup
NRS scale
Numeric Pain Rating scale is a unidimensional measure of pain in which a patient selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain. 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain possible
from enrollment to 12 months post-operative followup
Secondary Outcomes (5)
surgical time
the day of surgical procedure
complications
from surgery to 12 month follow-up
delta hemoglobin
from surgery to discharge, up to 4 weeks
Transfusions
from surgery to discharge, up to 4 weeks
hospital stay
from surgery to discharge, up to 4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
conventional total knee arthroplasty surgery
ACTIVE COMPARATORcomputer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
total knee arthroplasty performed with conventional technique
total knee arthroplasty performed with imageless computer-assisted surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with primary or secondary gonarthrosis with indication for knee arthroplasty with primary implant
- Males and females aged ≥ 45
- Willingness to participate in the study
- Acquisition of informed consent to participate
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are not capable of understanding and willing, and therefore unable to express consent to participation in the study
- Patient refusal to participate in the study and to sign the informed consent
- Nickel allergy (suspected or diagnosed)
- Pregnant women or women of childbearing age who cannot exclude pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, Italy
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2024
First Posted
September 23, 2024
Study Start
February 12, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 12, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 12, 2026
Last Updated
September 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09