NCT06387693

Brief Summary

Angina pectoris is diagnosed in \>180.000 people in the Netherlands each year. Diagnosis in angina pectoris focuses on epicardial coronary stenosis, the identification of which may lead to guideline-directed medical therapy or revascularization. However, no such stenosis is identified in 40-70% of patients. This condition, angina with no obstructed coronary artery (ANOCA), is more prevalent in women and is related to poor quality of life, high medical expenses, and a higher incidence of adverse events. The origin of ANOCA can be evaluated during invasive coronary angiography by coronary function testing (CFT) to identify coronary vasomotor disorders. This relates to vasospasm of the coronary artery and microcirculation, or to impaired microvascular vasodilation. For the diagnosis of vasospasm, CFT needs to result in electrocardiographic signs of myocardial ischemia as part of the diagnostic criteria. This is a critical point in the diagnosis of vasospasm, as these signs can be subtle and can vary, and are therefore prone to misinterpretation. Apart from this caveat, the diagnosis approach therefore currently requires an invasive procedure for the diagnosis. This limits the broad application and hampers early identification and treatment of ANOCA. During CFT, a coronary guide wire is routinely advanced in the coronary artery which also allows obtaining an intracoronary ECG by attaching a sterile alligator clamp to a standard electrocardiogram lead. This allows continuous recording of intracoronary ECG throughout CFT on the same monitor as the routine ECG. This technique can increase sensitivity for myocardial ischemia during CFT. Further, Holter ECG monitoring allows the identification of ischemic changes in the ECG in the outpatient setting. Evidence is lacking on the patterns of myocardial ischemia that occur during spontaneous angina pectoris symptoms in ANOCA patients, and on the sensitivity of Holter ECG for this purpose. Finally, the interpretation of ischemic patterns on ECG tracings can be cumbersome, especially when changes are subtle or change from beat to beat. The use of deep learning techniques allows to automate the interpretation of ECG traces and may improve the standardized diagnosis in ANOCA.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
250

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
32mo left

Started Dec 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress36%
Dec 2024Dec 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 3, 2024

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 29, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 3, 2024

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2028

Expected
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2028

Last Updated

January 12, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

April 3, 2024

Last Update Submit

January 8, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Prevalence of myocardial ischemia in patients with equivocal coronary function test results

    The prevalence of ischemic changes on the intracoronary ECG in patients with equivocal coronary function test results.

    During the procedure

  • Diagnostic accuracy of perprocedural Holter ECG monitoring to diagnose coronary vasomotor disorders

    Accuracy of the Holter ECG to identify ischemic ECG changes compared with the standard 12-lead ECG during acetylcholine-provoked chest pain.

    During the procedure

  • Diagnostic ccuracy of outpatient Holter monitoring for coronary vasomotor disorders

    Diagnostic accuracy of outpatient Holter monitoring to diagnose vasomotor disorders using the coronary function test results as the reference standard

    7 days

Study Arms (1)

Single arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Intracoronary ECG and Holter ECG monitoring

Diagnostic Test: Holter monitoring, intracoronary ECG

Interventions

Holter monitoring device to track ECG abnormalities during spontaneous chest pain in the outpatient setting. Intracoronary ECG to evaluate perprocedural ECG responses

Single arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical indication for comprehensive coronary function testing because of persisting chest discomfort at least 2 times per week despite current medical therapy.
  • Absence of obstructive coronary artery disease with an indication for revascularization, documented by means of recent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) or invasive coronary angiography (with invasive coronary pressure measurements if clinically indicated).
  • Patient is willing and able to provide written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Absence of chest discomfort after initiation of medical therapy.
  • Language barrier preventing sufficient understanding and communication in Dutch.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UMC Utrecht

Utrecht, Netherlands

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Angina, Stable

Interventions

Electrocardiography, Ambulatory

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Angina PectorisMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular DiseasesChest PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ElectrocardiographyHeart Function TestsDiagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisElectrodiagnosisMonitoring, AmbulatoryMonitoring, Physiologic

Central Study Contacts

Tim P van de Hoef, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2024

First Posted

April 29, 2024

Study Start

December 3, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Last Updated

January 12, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

IPD will be made available upon reasonable request.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
A fully anonymized data set containing data from those patients who agreed with data sharing will be available upon reasonable request 12 months after finalization of the study.

Locations