NCT06387303

Brief Summary

Moderate to severe postoperative pain is relatively common after major abdominal surgery. It is associated with less than optimal surgical experience, poor quality of recovery, and the development of persistent postsurgical pain. Opioids remain a significant component of postoperative pain management. Side effects of opioids used for the treatment of postoperative pain include constipation, pruritus, nausea, and vomiting. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols involve the utilization of multimodal analgesia. Analgesic techniques used include epidural analgesia, nerve blocks, and Intrathecal (IT) administration of morph ne. IT morphine reduces the postoperative opioid requirement for 18-24 hours after major abdominal surgery and reduces hospital length of stay (LOS) compared with epidural analgesia. A significant number of patients who receive IT morphine still experience moderate to severe postoperative p in. Additionally, many patients refuse the invasive procedure or cannot receive IT morphine due to procedure contraindications, thrombocytopenia, and/or coagulopathy. Intravenous (IV) methadone has a long analgesic half-life and has N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) properties. It has previously been shown to reduce postoperative opioid requirements, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and postoperative pain scores in patients who underwent orthopedic, abdominal, complex spine, and cardiac surg ry. Similar findings have been shown in obstetric patients who underwent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia as well as patients who underwent gynecologic surgery. IV methadone has, however, never been compared with IT morphine as a postoperative analgesic. The hypothesis is that intravenous (IV) methadone is non-inferior to IT morphine in patients who undergo major abdominal surg ry. It offers the advantage of being a noninvasive analgesic modality that may contribute to decreasing opioid consumption during the first 72 hours postoperatively, controlling postoperative pain, and improving the quality of recovery after surgery.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for early_phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 23, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 29, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 6, 2024

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 11, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 11, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

August 11, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

April 23, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 5, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Quality of Recovery 15 score

    The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale is a patient-reported outcome measurement of the quality of recovery after surgery and anesthesia. The scale ranges from 0 to 150, with a higher score indicating a better quality of recovery. A score of 0 indicates extremely poor quality of recovery, while a score of 150 indicates excellent quality of recovery. The QoR-15 score can be classified into four severity classes: excellent, good, moderate, and poor recovery.

    24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 42 days, 92 days

  • Overall Benefits of Analgesic Score

    The overall benefit of analgesic score (OBAS) is a daily survey that assesses a patient's satisfaction with analgesia, pain intensity, and adverse effects. To compute score, add all scores in items 1-7. Range: \[0 - 28\]. A low score indicates high benefit 1. Rate your current pain at rest on a scale between 0=minimal pain and 4=maximum imaginable pain 2. Grade any distress and bother from vomiting in the past 24 hours (0=not at all to 4=very much) 3. Grade any distress and bother from itching in the past 24 hours (0=not at all to 4=very much) 4. Grade any distress and bother from sweating in the past 24 hours (0=not at all to 4=very much) 5. Grade any distress and bother from freezing in the past 24 hours (0=not at all to 4=very much) 6. Grade any distress and bother from dizziness in the past 24 hours (0=not at all to 4=very much) 7. How satisfied are you with your pain treatment during the past 24 hours (0=not at all to 4= very much)

    24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 42 days, 92 days

  • morphine milligram equivalent

    morphine milligram equivalent is a measurement of a given analgesic effect standardized to a milligram of morphine. In other words agent X has the same effect as Y milligrams of morphine.

    24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours

  • Numeric Rating Scale pain scores (NRS)

    The numeric rating scale (NRS) is a pain screening tool commonly used to assess pain severity at a given moment in time. It uses a 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable."

    24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • McGill Pain questionnaire score

    42 days, 92 days

  • Numeric Rating Pain Score (NRS)

    42 days, 92 days

Study Arms (2)

Intrathecal Morphine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

250 mcg Intrathecal Injection prior to incision

Drug: Morphine

Intravenous Methadone

EXPERIMENTAL

0.2 mg / kg Intravenous delivery prior to incision. Maximum dosage will be 20 mg.

Drug: Methadone

Interventions

Intravenous Methadone

Also known as: Intrathecal Methadone
Intravenous Methadone

Intrathecal Morphine

Also known as: Intravenous Morphine
Intrathecal Morphine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physiological status I-III
  • Undergoing laparotomy with midline incision
  • Body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 45
  • Ability to understand and read English
  • Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits and study procedures

You may not qualify if:

  • Not able or unwilling to sign consent
  • Patients undergoing ambulatory surgery or anticipated to be discharged sooner than 24 hours after surgery
  • Patients with chronic pain, requiring daily opioid use at the time of surgery, MME \>60 as the FDA defines opioid tolerant as 60 MME, long-acting forms of opioids such as fentanyl patch, oxycontin.
  • Pregnant Women
  • Patients requiring emergent surgery
  • Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia including:
  • Coagulopathy
  • localized infection at the site of injection
  • pre-existing spinal pathology, specifically defined as active radiculopathy, severe central canal stenosis in the lumbar region, or an acute fracture in the lumbar region
  • length of the QT interval (QTc) \>450 on the most recent preoperative electrocardiogram (EKG)
  • Prior spinal fusion
  • Active or Prior Substance Use Disorder, undergoing active treatment with Medication of Opioid Use Disorder including methadone (once daily dosing), Buprenorphine (any formulation) and Naltrexone

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Virginia

Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908-0710, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (16)

  • Brandsborg B, Nikolajsen L, Hansen CT, Kehlet H, Jensen TS. Risk factors for chronic pain after hysterectomy: a nationwide questionnaire and database study. Anesthesiology. 2007 May;106(5):1003-12. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000265161.39932.e8.

    PMID: 17457133BACKGROUND
  • Bauchat JR, Habib AS. Evidence-based anesthesia for major gynecologic surgery. Anesthesiol Clin. 2015 Mar;33(1):173-207. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2014.11.011. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

    PMID: 25701935BACKGROUND
  • Hein A, Rosblad P, Gillis-Haegerstrand C, Schedvins K, Jakobsson J, Dahlgren G. Low dose intrathecal morphine effects on post-hysterectomy pain: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Jan;56(1):102-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02574.x.

    PMID: 22150410BACKGROUND
  • Modesitt SC, Sarosiek BM, Trowbridge ER, Redick DL, Shah PM, Thiele RH, Tiouririne M, Hedrick TL. Enhanced Recovery Implementation in Major Gynecologic Surgeries: Effect of Care Standardization. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):457-66. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001555.

    PMID: 27500337BACKGROUND
  • Horlocker TT, Vandermeuelen E, Kopp SL, Gogarten W, Leffert LR, Benzon HT. Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Fourth Edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Apr;43(3):263-309. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000763. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29561531BACKGROUND
  • Kharasch ED. Intraoperative methadone: rediscovery, reappraisal, and reinvigoration? Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):13-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fec9a3. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21173206BACKGROUND
  • Mancini I, Lossignol DA, Body JJ. Opioid switch to oral methadone in cancer pain. Curr Opin Oncol. 2000 Jul;12(4):308-13. doi: 10.1097/00001622-200007000-00006.

    PMID: 10888415BACKGROUND
  • Slotkin TA, Seidler FJ, Whitmore WL. Methadone inhibits serotonin and norephinephrine uptake into rat brain synaptosomes and synaptic vesicles in vitro but not in vivo. Eur J Pharmacol. 1978 Jun 15;49(4):357-62. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(78)90309-6.

    PMID: 668807BACKGROUND
  • Gourlay GK, Wilson PR, Glynn CJ. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of methadone during the perioperative period. Anesthesiology. 1982 Dec;57(6):458-67. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198212000-00005. No abstract available.

    PMID: 6128949BACKGROUND
  • Machado FC, Palmeira CCA, Torres JNL, Vieira JE, Ashmawi HA. Intraoperative use of methadone improves control of postoperative pain in morbidly obese patients: a randomized controlled study. J Pain Res. 2018 Oct 2;11:2123-2129. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S172235. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30323647BACKGROUND
  • Gottschalk A, Durieux ME, Nemergut EC. Intraoperative methadone improves postoperative pain control in patients undergoing complex spine surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):218-23. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d8a095. Epub 2010 Apr 24.

    PMID: 20418538BACKGROUND
  • Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Marymont JH, Shear T, Parikh KN, Patel SS, Gupta DK. Intraoperative Methadone for the Prevention of Postoperative Pain: A Randomized, Double-blinded Clinical Trial in Cardiac Surgical Patients. Anesthesiology. 2015 May;122(5):1112-22. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000633.

    PMID: 25837528BACKGROUND
  • Russell T, Mitchell C, Paech MJ, Pavy T. Efficacy and safety of intraoperative intravenous methadone during general anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: a retrospective case-control study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013 Jan;22(1):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

    PMID: 23219678BACKGROUND
  • Richlin DM, Reuben SS. Postoperative pain control with methadone following lower abdominal surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1991 Mar-Apr;3(2):112-6. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(91)90007-a.

    PMID: 2039637BACKGROUND
  • Bergstrom JE, Scott ME, Alimi Y, Yen TT, Hobson D, Machado KK, Tanner EJ 3rd, Fader AN, Temkin SM, Wethington S, Levinson K, Sokolinsky S, Lau B, Stone RL. Narcotics reduction, quality and safety in gynecologic oncology surgery in the first year of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol implementation. Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jun;149(3):554-559. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

    PMID: 29661495BACKGROUND
  • Krantz MJ, Martin J, Stimmel B, Mehta D, Haigney MC. QTc interval screening in methadone treatment. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Mar 17;150(6):387-95. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-6-200903170-00103. Epub 2009 Jan 19.

    PMID: 19153406BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

MethadoneMorphine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

KetonesOrganic ChemicalsMorphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic Compounds

Central Study Contacts

Keita Ikeda, PH.D.

CONTACT

Priyanka Singla, M.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: a single blind study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2024

First Posted

April 29, 2024

Study Start

August 6, 2024

Primary Completion

May 11, 2026

Study Completion

May 11, 2026

Last Updated

August 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations