NCT06381297

Brief Summary

The aim of this clinical trial was to determine the effect of multiple sclerosis on speech reception and discrimination in noise and to compare the effects on the medial olivocochlear reflex, which is thought to affect speech intelligibility in noise, with a control group. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does MS disease affect the ability to discriminate speech in noise? Does MS affect contralateral suppression results assessing medial olivocochlear function? Is there a correlation between the ability to discriminate speech in noise and contralateral suppression skills of MS patients? Data from MS patients and healthy participants will be compared. Thirty relapsing remitting MS patients and 30 healthy participants admitted to the clinic will be evaluated.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 9, 2020

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 23, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 23, 2023

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 1, 2024

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 24, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 24, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

April 1, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 18, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Multıple sclerosis,Auditory efferent systemContralateral supressionspeech in noise discrimination

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Pure tone Audiometry Test

    Air and bone conduction hearing thresholds will be measured using a Grason-Stadler GSI 61 Clinical Audiometer in a quiet room of the Industrial Acoustic Company (IAC) Inc. standard. Airway hearing thresholds will be measured using Telephonics TDH 39 headphones and bone conduction hearing thresholds will be measured using Radioear B-71 bone vibrator. Airway hearing thresholds will be evaluated at frequencies of 0.25 -8 kHz and bone conduction hearing thresholds at 0.5-4 kHz. As pure tone average, 500-1000-2000 Hz air and bone conduction thresholds will be calculated separately for both ears. A pure tone average between 0-15 dB will be considered normal hearing.

    six month

  • Speech Audiometry

    Speech Audiometry will be performed in a quiet room to IAC (Industrial Acoustic Company) standards using a Grason-Stadler GSI 61 Clinical Audiometer. Speech reception threshold will be determined using three syllable word lists. A 40 dB Sensation Level (SL) will be added above the speech reception threshold and the patient will be asked if he/she can hear comfortably. After determining the level at which the patient can hear most comfortably, 25-word monosyllabic isophonic word lists will be read and the speech discrimination score will be calculated as a percentage. Individuals with a speech discrimination score of 88% and above and with an agreement between speech reception threshold and pure tone averages (SSO) will be included in the study.

    six month

  • Speech Discrimination in Noise Test

    The SDN test will be performed in a quiet room in accordance with the Industrial Acoustic Company (IAC) standard using the Grason-Stadler GSI 61 Clinical Audiometer. After pure tone audiometry and speech tests, the GKAE test will be performed. The speech in noise discrimination test will be performed with a signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of +10 dB. A word list at 50 dB SL will be presented to the tested ear using live sound, while simultaneously white noise at 40 dB SL will be presented to the test ear (Beattie et al. 1997). This will be done for both ears. The speech in noise discrimination test scores will be calculated as percentages (%) for both ears.

    Six month

  • Otoacoustic Emission Test

    TEOAE measurements of all individuals in the study and control groups will be performed using the computer-based Otodynamics ILO-V6 'cochlear emission analyzer' and software version 5.61 (Otodynamics, London). Adult TEOAE probe will be used for all OAE measurements. The probe will be calibrated in a 1 cc acoustic calibration cavity. The measurement will be performed by averaging the nonlinear, 80 µsec, 260 click stimulus response at 80 ± 3 dB SPL. "Noise rejection level of 47 dB, wave reproducibility of 70% or more, and stimulus stability greater than 80% will be taken into consideration.

    Six month

  • Contralateral Suppression Test

    For TEOAE and contralateral suppression measurements, 60 dB SL white noise will be applied from the opposite ear using a TEOAE probe and emission amplitudes will be measured from the same side ear. All OAE measurements will be performed by inserting the probe once and TEOAE and contralateral suppression tests will be performed respectively. Amplitude (dB) values obtained with suppression at 1000, 1414, 2000, 2828 and 4000 Hz will be used as study parameters.

    Six month

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale

    Six Month

  • Symbol Digit Modalities Test

    Six Month

Study Arms (2)

MS group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Study group (MS patients)

Diagnostic Test: Hearing testDiagnostic Test: Speech in noise discrimination testDiagnostic Test: Montreal Cognitive Assessment ScaleDiagnostic Test: Symbol Number Modalities Test (SDMT)

Control group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Control group ( Healty individuals)

Diagnostic Test: Hearing testDiagnostic Test: Speech in noise discrimination testDiagnostic Test: Montreal Cognitive Assessment ScaleDiagnostic Test: Symbol Number Modalities Test (SDMT)

Interventions

Hearing testDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Hearing and speech tests of MS group and control group in the presence and absence of noise will be evaluated. Suppression test will be performed with OAE test in the presence and absence of noise.

Also known as: Contralateral supression test
Control groupMS group

Speech discrimination in noise (SDN) test will be performed in a quiet room in accordance with the Industrial Acoustic Company (IAC) standard using the Grason-Stadler GSI 61 Clinical Audiometer. After pure tone audiometry and speech tests, the GKAE test will be performed. The speech in noise discrimination test will be performed with a signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of +10 dB. A word list at 50 dB SL will be presented to the tested ear using live sound, while simultaneously white noise at 40 dB SL will be presented to the test ear (Beattie et al. 1997). This will be done for both ears. The speech in noise discrimination test scores will be calculated as percentages (%) for both ears.

Control groupMS group

Translated into Turkish as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale and abbreviated as MOBID, MOCA assesses attention, executive/managerial functions, memory, visual-spatial skills, language, abstract thinking and arithmetic. It is easy and practical to apply. The score that can be obtained varies between 0-30. The cut-off point for cognitive impairment is 21. Patients who perform below 21 points are considered to have cognitive impairment. Although it is not a battery used in the MS patient group, a study conducted on 39 MS patients and 20 healthy people showed that it can be used safely for screening purposes in patients with MS (Aksoy et al., 2013; Nasreddine et al., 2005; Selekler \& Cangoz, 2009).

Control groupMS group

Attention, visuospatial information processing speed and working memory are assessed. It is one of the subtests of the Short Repeatable Neuropsychological Battery developed to assess cognitive functions in MS (Smith, 1973).

Control groupMS group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical diagnosis of Relapsing-remitting MS The absence of other neurological, psychiatric or metabolic diseases besides MS.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ondokuz Mayıs University

Samsun, 55300, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

Interventions

Hearing Tests

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Multiple SclerosisDemyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNSAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesDemyelinating DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic Techniques, OtologicalDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Study Officials

  • ASUMAN KÜÇÜKÖNER, Dr.

    Ondokuz Mayıs University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: Multiple sclerosis patient group and healthy control group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2024

First Posted

April 24, 2024

Study Start

October 9, 2020

Primary Completion

March 23, 2023

Study Completion

April 23, 2023

Last Updated

April 24, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

It will be published as a research article.

Locations