NCT06378879

Brief Summary

It is unclear whether continuous infusion or intermittent bolus injection of propofol is better for achieving adequate sedation during a standard upper endoscopy. The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous infusion and intermittent bolus injection of Propofol (Diprivan) during a standard upper endoscopy. In this prospective study, patients will be randomly assigned to undergo a standard upper endoscopy with either continuous infusion (CI group) or intermittent bolus injection (BI group) of Propofol (Diprivan) administered by an anesthesiologist. The primary outcome will be to assess the quality of sedation by the endoscopist (VAS). In addition to other sedation-related parameters that will include sedation induction time (minutes), total dose of propofol (mg), recovery time (minutes) using Aldrete score, any involuntary patient movement, and adverse events.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2024

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 30, 2024

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 23, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 6, 2024

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 7, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

March 30, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 5, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

PropofolDormicumInfusionBolusGastroscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Sedation induction time (minutes)

    Sedation induction time (minutes) is the time measured from the deep sedation induction until the patient is deeply sedated

    30 minutes

  • Total dose of propofol (mg)

    Total dose of propofol (mg) used during the upper endoscopy procedure

    30 minutes

  • Recovery time (minutes)

    Recovery time (minutes) is the time used for the patients to open their eyes after stoping sedation

    30 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Involuntary movement

    30 minutes

  • Quality of sedation

    30 minutes

  • Adverse events

    30 minutes

Study Arms (2)

Continuous infusion (CI group) of propofol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

CI was defined by continuous propofol infusion at a 3 mg/ kg/h rate with induction using benzodiazepine (2 mg dormicum i.v.) to evaluate the effect of the drug and assess sedation induction time, total dose of propofol, recovery time, quality of sedation.

Drug: Propofol 100 MG in 10 ML Injection

Intermittent bolus injection (BI group) of propofol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

BI was defined by intermittent use of 20 mg propofol boluses on demand, with a minimum period of 30 seconds between boluses to evaluate the effect of the drug and assess sedation induction time, total dose of propofol, recovery time, quality of sedation.

Drug: Propofol 100 MG in 10 ML Injection

Interventions

Sedation induction time (minutes), total dose of propofol (mg), recovery time (minutes), any involuntary patient movement, quality of sedation (VAS) and adverse events

Also known as: Diprivan (100mg/10ml)
Continuous infusion (CI group) of propofolIntermittent bolus injection (BI group) of propofol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients of both genders
  • Age between 18 and 85 years old
  • Referred to standard upper endoscopy at Luzmila Hospital

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are pregnant,
  • Known allergies to the used drugs
  • History of sedation-related complications (i.e., severe paradoxical response, hypoxemia, bradycardia, and hypotension)
  • Previous history of gastrectomy,
  • Patients are American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class ≥ IV ,
  • Patients are unable to provide informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (10)

  • Gonzalez-Santiago JM, Martin-Noguerol E, Vinagre-Rodriguez G, Hernandez-Alonso M, Duenas-Sadornil C, Perez-Gallardo B, Mateos-Rodriguez JM, Fernandez-Bermejo M, Robledo-Andres P, Molina-Infante J. Intermittent boluses versus pump continuous infusion for endoscopist-directed propofol administration in colonoscopy. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2013 Aug;105(7):378-84. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082013000700002.

    PMID: 24206547BACKGROUND
  • Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN, Benson AA, Miller KM, Durkalski V, Aisenberg J. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 May;101(5):967-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00500.x.

    PMID: 16573781BACKGROUND
  • Jung M, Hofmann C, Kiesslich R, Brackertz A. Improved sedation in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: propofol is an alternative to midazolam. Endoscopy. 2000 Mar;32(3):233-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-96.

    PMID: 10718389BACKGROUND
  • Riphaus A, Stergiou N, Wehrmann T. Sedation with propofol for routine ERCP in high-risk octogenarians: a randomized, controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Sep;100(9):1957-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41672.x.

    PMID: 16128939BACKGROUND
  • McQuaid KR, Laine L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 May;67(6):910-23. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.12.046.

    PMID: 18440381BACKGROUND
  • Dumonceau JM, Riphaus A, Aparicio JR, Beilenhoff U, Knape JT, Ortmann M, Paspatis G, Ponsioen CY, Racz I, Schreiber F, Vilmann P, Wehrmann T, Wientjes C, Walder B; NAAP Task Force Members. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates, and the European Society of Anaesthesiology Guideline: Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2010 Nov;42(11):960-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255728. Epub 2010 Nov 11.

    PMID: 21072716BACKGROUND
  • ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Early DS, Lightdale JR, Vargo JJ 2nd, Acosta RD, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi KV, Evans JA, Fisher DA, Fonkalsrud L, Hwang JH, Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR, Pasha SF, Saltzman JR, Shergill AK, Cash BD, DeWitt JM. Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Feb;87(2):327-337. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.018. Epub 2018 Jan 3. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29306520BACKGROUND
  • Riphaus A, Geist C, Schrader K, Martchenko K, Wehrmann T. Intermittent manually controlled versus continuous infusion of propofol for deep sedation during interventional endoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep;47(8-9):1078-85. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2012.685758. Epub 2012 May 28.

    PMID: 22631051BACKGROUND
  • Hendrix JM, Garmon EH. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System. 2025 Feb 11. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441940/

    PMID: 28722969BACKGROUND
  • Roelandt P, Haesaerts R, Demedts I, Bisschops R. Implementation of the Aldrete score reduces recovery time after non-anesthesiologist-administered procedural sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endosc Int Open. 2022 Dec 15;10(12):E1544-E1547. doi: 10.1055/a-1964-7458. eCollection 2022 Dec.

    PMID: 36531676BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Interventions

PropofolInjections

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsDrug Administration RoutesDrug TherapyTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Tarek Mazzawi, MD, PhD

    Faculty of Medicine, Al-Balqa Applied University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Tarek Mazzawi, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Fayez Alhadidi, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2024

First Posted

April 23, 2024

Study Start

September 6, 2024

Primary Completion

April 30, 2025

Study Completion

July 30, 2025

Last Updated

August 7, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The analysis and results will be published in peer-reviewed journal. Study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent will be provided upon request.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
During 2025
Access Criteria
According to publishing journal