How Do We Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Approach Sciatic Nerve Block?
1 other identifier
interventional
92
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this prospective, randomized, observer-blind study to compare subparaneural approach injection with interneural approach injection in popliteal sciatic nerve blocks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 20, 2025
September 1, 2024
9 months
April 1, 2024
July 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Onset Time
Onset time will be defined as the moment when it is determined that the block is successful.
Time from the moment the block is made to the moment it starts, within the first half hour
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Block Execution Times
1-10 minutes
Need for Multiple Injections Owing to Insufficient Anesthesia
Within 24 hours
Additional Rescue Analgesic
Within 24 hours
Adverse Effects to Anesthesia
During the block period, within 24 hours
Hemodynamic Effects Of The Block
0th minutes, 5th minutes,10th minutes,15th minutes,20th minutes,25th minutes,30th minutes,35th minutes,40th minutes,45th minutes,50th minutes,55th minutes and 60th minutes and then at 1-hour intervals and 15th minutes,30th minutes
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Subparaneural Injection (Group S)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe position of the patients will be prone.The skin will be cleaned according to asepsis and antisepsis rules.After preparing the USG a high-frequency linear array transducer under sterile conditions,we will be positioned it transversely in the popliteal fossa.After visualizing the artery,its hyperechoic nerves will be founded superficially.The sciatic nerve will be identified proximally to visualize where the TN and CPN eventually come together to form the sciatic nerve and separate distally where the CPN moves laterally and the TN remains medially.Once the nerves began to separate,they will be scanned until a figure 8 or pant leg image will be obtained.Using the in-plane technique under ultrasonography guidance, injection will be applied to the subparaneural area in Group S.1 ml of LA solution was injected for the purpose of verifying proper needle insertion.A standard dose of 15 mL bupivacaine 0.5% and 5mg/mL local anesthetic was used accompanied by a 20G,12mm block needle.
Interneural Injection (Group I)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe position of the patients will be prone.The skin will be cleaned according to asepsis and antisepsis rules.After preparing the USG a high-frequency linear array transducer under sterile conditions, we will be positioned it transversely in the popliteal fossa.After visualizing the artery, its hyperechoic nerves will be founded superficially.The sciatic nerve will be identified proximally to visualize where the TN and CPN eventually come together to form the sciatic nerve and separate distally where the CPN moves laterally and the TN remains medially.Once the nerves began to separate, they will be scanned until a figure 8 or pant leg image will be obtained.Using the in-plane technique under ultrasonography guidance, injection will be applied to the interneural area in Group I.1 ml of LA solution was injected for the purpose of verifying proper needle insertion.A standard dose of 15 mL bupivacaine 0.5% and 5mg/mL local anesthetic was used accompanied by a 20 G, 12mm block needle.
Interventions
Comparison of two different methods in terms of various features
Comparison of two different methods in terms of various features
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years and over
- Planned foot, ankle or toe amputation
- ASA III-IV risk group
- Patients who agreed to be included in the study
You may not qualify if:
- People with neurological and psychiatric diseases
- Using opioids or another analgesic for chronic pain
- Allergic to local anesthetics
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Those with infection or sepsis in the application area
- Patients who did not agree to be included in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
Ankara, Çankaya, 06000, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Semih Başkan
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doç. Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2024
First Posted
April 18, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion
February 1, 2025
Study Completion
April 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-09