M-Well Bonding Bundle to Improve Patient-Physician Relationships
Engineering Whole Health Into Hospital Care to Improve Wellness: Bonding Bundle
2 other identifiers
interventional
967
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn more about the interaction between a patient in the hospital and their treating doctor. A good relationship between patients and their doctors can help improve patient care. Doctors will be asked to use strategies to improve their interactions with patients in the hospital. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Will using the intervention strategies improve doctors' empathy towards their patients?
- Will using the intervention strategies lead to improved scores in patient views of doctors' empathy? There will be 2 study arms. One group of doctors will be asked to use the intervention strategies. The other group of doctors will provide care as they would normally. Researchers will compare the doctors in the intervention arm to those in the control arm. Doctors are the primary subjects for this study. The doctors in both study arms will be asked to do the following:
- Allow study staff to observe the interaction between them and their patients.
- Complete a brief survey at the end of their 2-week work rotation.
- Allow study staff to observe the interaction between them and their doctors.
- Complete a brief survey after meeting with their doctor.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 3, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2026
CompletedApril 2, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.9 years
April 3, 2024
March 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE)
The JSE is a 20-item validated instrument that measures a physicians empathy for their patients. Physicians are asked to rate their disagreement or agreement with individual statements on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree; 7 = Strongly Agree). Using a scoring algorithm, a total Empathy score will be generated with a range from 20-140, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of empathy.
Given once at the end of each work rotation in the study. Work rotations are usually 14-15 days.
Jefferson Scale of Patient's Perceptions of Physician Empathy (JSPPPE)
The JSPPPE is a 5-item validated instrument that measures patients' perception of physicians' empathic orientation and behavior. Patients are asked to rate their disagreement or agreement with individual statements to describe their physician after an encounter with that physician on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree; 7 = Strongly Agree). A total JSPPPE score will be generated with a range from 5-45, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of perceived empathy.
Asked once during hospital stay, typically 1 day to 30 days.
Communication Assessment Tool
The Communication Assessment Tool is a validated 15-item survey to measure patient perspective of the interaction and communication with a healthcare provider. We are using 14 questions from the Communication Assessment Tool that ask about a patient's opinion about their communication with their doctor. One item was dropped as it does not apply to the inpatient setting. Patients are asked to rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale (1=poor to 5 =excellent). Scores for individual questions will be assessed. A summary score will also be calculated with a range of 14-70, with higher scores indicating better communication.
Asked once during hospital stay, typically 1 day to 30 days.
Frequency of use of intervention methods
Percentage of times that the physician used intervention methods during interactions with patients.
During their work rotation in the study. Work rotations are usually 14-15 days.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Perceived duration of interaction
Asked once during hospital stay, typically 1 day to 30 days
Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale
Asked once during hospital stay, typically 1 day to 30 days
Study Arms (2)
Bonding Bundle Intervention
EXPERIMENTALDoctors in the intervention arm will be asked to use suggested approaches while meeting with their hospitalized patients. The goal of these strategies is to improve the relationship and interactions between patients and physicians.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONDoctors in the control arm will be asked to visit with their patients as they would normally.
Interventions
Doctors in the intervention arm will be asked to use suggested approaches while meeting with their hospitalized patients. The goal of these strategies is to improve the relationship and interactions between patients and physicians.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Attending physicians caring for hospitalized medical patients
You may not qualify if:
- Surgical attendings
- Residents
- Secondary Subjects - Patients
- Hospitalized adult patient
- Patient of an enrolled physician in the study
- Cognitively impaired
- Unable to provide informed consent
- Does not speak English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sanjay Saint, MD
University of Michigan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- George Dock Professor of Internal Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2024
First Posted
April 9, 2024
Study Start
April 8, 2024
Primary Completion
February 28, 2026
Study Completion
February 28, 2026
Last Updated
April 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- After the final publication from this study, for at least 6 years.
- Access Criteria
- De-identified data will be provided after requesters sign a Letter of Agreement (LOA) detailing the mechanisms by which the data will be kept secure. The LOA will also state that the recipient will not attempt to identify any individual in the data, will not share the data outside of their research team, and will provide information on any files to be linked to the data. The dataset will not include personal identifying information and all dates will be changed to integers to allow for calculation of time periods.
A de-identified, anonymized dataset will be created. Members of the scientific community who would like a copy of the final data sets (i.e., data sets underlying any publication) from this study can request a copy by e-mailing Jennifer Burns at Jennifer.Burns@va.gov. They should state their reason for requesting the data and their plans for analyzing the data. Data sets will be accompanied by a data dictionary for all study variables, both derived and raw data. The most cost-effective means for sharing data after a data-sharing agreement has been reached will be used. For example, data may be copied to a compact disk (CD) or digital versatile disk (DVD), be posted on a password protected and secure website, or made available through a third-party data archive service. Resources that are patentable and/or protectable under intellectual property rights will not be shared.