NCT06354920

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn more about the interaction between a patient in the hospital and their treating doctor. A good relationship between patients and their doctors can help improve patient care. Doctors will be asked to use strategies to improve their interactions with patients in the hospital. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Will using the intervention strategies improve doctors' empathy towards their patients?
  • Will using the intervention strategies lead to improved scores in patient views of doctors' empathy? There will be 2 study arms. One group of doctors will be asked to use the intervention strategies. The other group of doctors will provide care as they would normally. Researchers will compare the doctors in the intervention arm to those in the control arm. Doctors are the primary subjects for this study. The doctors in both study arms will be asked to do the following:
  • Allow study staff to observe the interaction between them and their patients.
  • Complete a brief survey at the end of their 2-week work rotation.
  • Allow study staff to observe the interaction between them and their doctors.
  • Complete a brief survey after meeting with their doctor.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
967

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 3, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 8, 2024

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 9, 2024

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

April 2, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

April 3, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 27, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

EmpathyPhysician-Patient RelationsHealth communication

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE)

    The JSE is a 20-item validated instrument that measures a physicians empathy for their patients. Physicians are asked to rate their disagreement or agreement with individual statements on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree; 7 = Strongly Agree). Using a scoring algorithm, a total Empathy score will be generated with a range from 20-140, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of empathy.

    Given once at the end of each work rotation in the study. Work rotations are usually 14-15 days.

  • Jefferson Scale of Patient's Perceptions of Physician Empathy (JSPPPE)

    The JSPPPE is a 5-item validated instrument that measures patients' perception of physicians' empathic orientation and behavior. Patients are asked to rate their disagreement or agreement with individual statements to describe their physician after an encounter with that physician on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree; 7 = Strongly Agree). A total JSPPPE score will be generated with a range from 5-45, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of perceived empathy.

    Asked once during hospital stay, typically 1 day to 30 days.

  • Communication Assessment Tool

    The Communication Assessment Tool is a validated 15-item survey to measure patient perspective of the interaction and communication with a healthcare provider. We are using 14 questions from the Communication Assessment Tool that ask about a patient's opinion about their communication with their doctor. One item was dropped as it does not apply to the inpatient setting. Patients are asked to rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale (1=poor to 5 =excellent). Scores for individual questions will be assessed. A summary score will also be calculated with a range of 14-70, with higher scores indicating better communication.

    Asked once during hospital stay, typically 1 day to 30 days.

  • Frequency of use of intervention methods

    Percentage of times that the physician used intervention methods during interactions with patients.

    During their work rotation in the study. Work rotations are usually 14-15 days.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Perceived duration of interaction

    Asked once during hospital stay, typically 1 day to 30 days

  • Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale

    Asked once during hospital stay, typically 1 day to 30 days

Study Arms (2)

Bonding Bundle Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Doctors in the intervention arm will be asked to use suggested approaches while meeting with their hospitalized patients. The goal of these strategies is to improve the relationship and interactions between patients and physicians.

Behavioral: Bonding Bundle

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Doctors in the control arm will be asked to visit with their patients as they would normally.

Interventions

Bonding BundleBEHAVIORAL

Doctors in the intervention arm will be asked to use suggested approaches while meeting with their hospitalized patients. The goal of these strategies is to improve the relationship and interactions between patients and physicians.

Bonding Bundle Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Attending physicians caring for hospitalized medical patients

You may not qualify if:

  • Surgical attendings
  • Residents
  • Secondary Subjects - Patients
  • Hospitalized adult patient
  • Patient of an enrolled physician in the study
  • Cognitively impaired
  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Does not speak English

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

Location

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

Location

Study Officials

  • Sanjay Saint, MD

    University of Michigan

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Quasi-experimental randomized controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
George Dock Professor of Internal Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2024

First Posted

April 9, 2024

Study Start

April 8, 2024

Primary Completion

February 28, 2026

Study Completion

February 28, 2026

Last Updated

April 2, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

A de-identified, anonymized dataset will be created. Members of the scientific community who would like a copy of the final data sets (i.e., data sets underlying any publication) from this study can request a copy by e-mailing Jennifer Burns at Jennifer.Burns@va.gov. They should state their reason for requesting the data and their plans for analyzing the data. Data sets will be accompanied by a data dictionary for all study variables, both derived and raw data. The most cost-effective means for sharing data after a data-sharing agreement has been reached will be used. For example, data may be copied to a compact disk (CD) or digital versatile disk (DVD), be posted on a password protected and secure website, or made available through a third-party data archive service. Resources that are patentable and/or protectable under intellectual property rights will not be shared.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
After the final publication from this study, for at least 6 years.
Access Criteria
De-identified data will be provided after requesters sign a Letter of Agreement (LOA) detailing the mechanisms by which the data will be kept secure. The LOA will also state that the recipient will not attempt to identify any individual in the data, will not share the data outside of their research team, and will provide information on any files to be linked to the data. The dataset will not include personal identifying information and all dates will be changed to integers to allow for calculation of time periods.

Locations