NCT06348420

Brief Summary

The study objective is to evaluate the relative merits, safety and effectiveness of Anti-reflux mucosal valvuloplasty (ARMV) in GERD patients currently treated with daily Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs).

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
74

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
31mo left

Started Sep 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress39%
Sep 2024Dec 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 22, 2024

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 4, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 10, 2024

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2025

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2028

Expected
Last Updated

November 18, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

March 22, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 14, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Endoscopic anti-refluxProton pump inhibitorRandomized controlled trialGastroesophageal reflux disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • GERD-HRQL

    Questionnaire (GERD-HRQL) : Total Score: Calculated by summing the individual scores to questions 1-15 Greatest possible score (worst symptoms)= 75 Lowest possible score (no symptoms)= 0 Heartburn Score: Calculated by summing the individual scores to questions 1-6 . Worst heartburn symptoms = 30 No heartburn symptoms= 0 Scores of ≤ 12 with each individual question not exceeding 2 indicate heartburn elimination. Regurgitation Score: Calculated by summing the individual scores to questions10-15. Worst regurgitation symptoms = 30 No regurgitation symptoms = 0 Scores of ≤ 12 with each individual question not exceeding 2 indicate regurgitation elimination.

    at 0, 6 months follow- up

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • GERD-Q score

    at 0, 3, 6 ,12 ,24,36 months follow- up

  • DeMeester score

    at 0, 6 and 24 months follow- up

  • Presence of reflux esophagitis

    at 0, 6 and 24 months follow- up

  • Appearance of the mucosal flap

    at 6 and 24 months follow- up

  • PPI use

    at 0, 3, 6 ,12 ,24,36 months follow- up

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

ARMV (intervention group)

EXPERIMENTAL

Under general anesthesia, patients are positioned in the left lateral decubitus position and undergo endoscopic examination of the esophagus and stomach. The surgery utilizes a single-channel gastroscope (EG29-i10, Pentax, Japan, or GIF-H290T, Olympus, Japan) and a high-frequency generator (VIO300D, Erbe, Germany). A transparent cap (D-201, Olympus, Japan) is attached to the gastroscope to improve visualization and aid in manipulating the flap valve. The DualKnife (Olympus, Japan) is selected for dissection due to its maneuverability in a retroflexed fashion. For patients with esophageal strictures obstructing scope passage, esophageal dilation is performed using Savary-Gilliard dilators (Cook Medical, USA) just before ARMV.

Procedure: anti-reflux mucosal valvuloplasty (ARMV)

PPI (control group)

NO INTERVENTION

Patients randomized to the PPI group will follow the PPI treatment scheme. If GERD symptoms are effectively controlled with their current PPI dosage for at least one month, the regimen is decreased by one step. Conversely, if symptoms are poorly controlled, the dosage is increased by one step based on the PPI algorithm, which aligns with best clinical practices. The use of PPI will be recorded in medication diaries using generic names listed in the table below and classified according to the daily dose and frequency. Dosage will be categorized as "double dose" = ≥30 or 40 mg per day, "full dose" = 30 or 40 mg per day, "half dose" = 15 or 20 mg per day, "occasional" or "on demand" = \< "full dose" taken for \< 50% of days in the follow-up period. Common medications include Nexium 20mg、Prevacid 30mg、Prilosec 20mg、Protonix 20mg、Aciphex20mg.The frequency of medication use is once a day.

Interventions

During the ARMV procedure, a segment of the mucosa at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is released and reconstructed to form a mucosal flap. Cautery markings are made on 3/4-4/5 of the mucosa along the lesser curvature, approximately 2 cm below the dentate line. After submucosal injection of saline with indigocarmine, the premarked mucosa is dissected from the caudal to cranial side using an endoscopic submucosal dissection technique. The cranial edge of the released mucosa is left in place, and the semi-free mucosa naturally curls to form a double-layer flap. Metal clips are then used to anchor the free edge of the mucosa to the exposed submucosa/smooth muscle to prevent flattening of the mucosal flap. Any visible bleeding on the exposed submucosa is coagulated using electric forceps.

ARMV (intervention group)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age;
  • Hiatal hernia ≤ 2 cm;
  • Sliding hernia ≤ 2 cm;
  • Recurrence of GERD symptoms after cessation of PPIs;
  • On daily PPI for ≥1 year or twice daily PPI for at least 8 weeks;
  • Esophagitis (Los Angeles Classification) Grade B, C, or D;
  • Hill's flap valve grade ≤ III;
  • Observation of distal esophageal pH \< 4 on at least 1-2 days within a 7-day period, with a percentage exceeding 5.3%;
  • Normal or near-normal esophageal motility;
  • Lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) ranging between 5-15 mmHg;
  • DeMeester score ≥ 14.7 or total reflux episodes exceeding 73;
  • Completion of a signed informed consent form.

You may not qualify if:

  • BMI \> 35 kg/m2;
  • ASA \> II;
  • Barrett's esophagus;
  • Hiatal hernia \> 2 cm;
  • Esophagitis (Los Angeles Classification) Grade A or No esophagitis;
  • Hill's flap valve grade \> III;
  • Peptic ulcer disease;
  • Primary esophageal motility disorders such as achalasia;
  • Severe gastroparesis;
  • History of previous esophageal or gastric surgery, including ARMS or ARMA;
  • Uncontrolled systemic diseases;
  • Gastric outlet obstruction;
  • Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Center

Jinan, Shandong, 250000, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Lv X, Ma W, Zeng Y, Lu J. Antireflux mucosal valvuloplasty versus proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in a tertiary healthcare centre in China: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 22;14(12):e088970. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088970.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gastroesophageal Reflux

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Esophageal Motility DisordersDeglutition DisordersEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2024

First Posted

April 4, 2024

Study Start

September 10, 2024

Primary Completion

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2028

Last Updated

November 18, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

We do not currently plan to grant public access to the participant-level dataset due to privacy concerns and data protection regulations. However, data access may be considered upon reasonable request, subject to ethical and regulatory approvals, to ensure compliance with participant confidentiality and legal requirements.

Locations