Strategies to Improve Well-Being and Diabetes Management
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This project aims to implement an adapted self-affirmation intervention among a population of individuals with diabetes to reduce the negative psychosocial impacts of stigma. In a self-affirmation, participants are guiding through a writing exercise writing designed to reinforce sources of self-worth before they encounter or engage in stressful or stigmatizing events. Participants in this study will be asked to complete self-affirmation exercises before their 3-month wellness appointments with their endocrinologists over the course of a year. The main questions the investigators are asking are:
- Will self-affirmation reduce feelings of stigmatization?
- Will self-affirmation increase self-efficacy and motivation to engage in condition management behaviors.
- Will self-affirmation improve blood glucose control. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention condition or a waitlist control condition. Participants in the waitlist control condition will also complete writing exercises but they will be abbreviated (this in the psychological literature is referred to as a "low affirmation condition"). At the end of the study, waitlist control participants will have access to the full exercise should they like to receive it. After each appointment and self-affirmation, participants will complete surveys assessing feelings of stigma and motivation to engage in condition management. All participants will already be using continuous glucose monitors. The investigators will compare both survey responses and continuous glucose data between our conditions to assess the efficacy of the self-affirmation intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started Jul 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 4, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 24, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2027
ExpectedSeptember 3, 2025
August 1, 2025
1.7 years
March 4, 2024
August 29, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Social Identity Threat Concerns (SITC) Scale - Adapted for Diabetes
Used to assess participants' concerns about experiencing diabetes-specific stigma-induced identity threat while receiving care for T2D. A 1 (Strongly disagree) to 7 (Strongly agree) Likert response scale is used for all items. A composite score is created by summing all items. Higher values indicate greater social identity threat concerns.
Immediately after each intervention; completed 4 times over the course of a year
Social Identity Threat Concerns (SITC) Scale - Adapted for Weight
Used to assess participants' concerns about experiencing weight-specific stigma-induced identity threat while receiving care for T2D. A 1 (Strongly disagree) to 7 (Strongly agree) Likert response scale is used for all items. A composite score is created by summing all items. Higher values indicate greater social identity threat concerns.
Immediately after each intervention; completed 4 times over the course of a year
Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale
6-item subscale assessing participants perceived and experienced stigma for use with adults with diabetes. A 1(strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) Likert response scale is used for all items. A composite score is created by summing all items. Higher values indicate greater diabetes stigma.
Immediately after each intervention; completed 4 times over the course of a year
Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale - Adapted for weight stigma
6-item subscale assessing participants perceived and experienced stigma for use with adults with diabetes. We adapted this measure to anchor on internalized weight stigma. A 1(strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) Likert response scale is used for all items. A composite score is created by summing all items. Higher values indicate greater diabetes stigma.
Immediately after each intervention; completed 4 times over the course of a year
The Revised Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire
27-items measure to assess uptake of essential self-management practices for Diabetes. A 0 (Does not apply to me) to 3 (Applies to me very much) Likert response scale is used for all items.
Immediately after each intervention; completed 4 times over the course of a year
Confidence in Diabetes Self-Care Scale
20-item measure assessing patient self-efficacy, confidence in ability to perform diabetes self-care tasks. A 1 ("No, I am sure I cannot") to 5 ("Yes, I am sure I can") Likert response scale is used for all items. A composite score is created by summing all items. Higher values indicate greater confidence.
Immediately after each intervention; completed 4 times over the course of a year
Blood glucose
Continuous glucose monitor derived indices for time spent in-range
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Hemoglobin A1C
Collected once at time of study enrollment and once at study completion
Patient-reported age
at end of study (1 year)
Patient Gender
Collected once at time of study enrollment
Patient Race
Collected once at time of study enrollment
Patient ethnicity
Collected once at time of study enrollment
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Self-Affirmation
EXPERIMENTALParticipants review a list of values and are instructed to choose up to two that are important to them. The values listed are intentionally unrelated to the threat-inducing domain so that the exercise broadens participants' focus. Next, participants are asked to write a few sentences about why their chosen values are important to them and identify times in which these values have helped them navigate challenges.
Waitlist Control
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants in the waitlist control condition will also complete writing exercises but they will be abbreviated (this in the psychological literature is referred to as a "low affirmation condition"). At the end of the study, waitlist control participants will have access to the full exercise should they like to receive it.
Interventions
Self-affirmation theory contends that integrity of one's self-concept (self integrity) is essential for navigating daily stressors. When individuals encounter information or contexts that pose a threat to one's self-integrity, we can adopt maladaptive coping strategies to alleviate the discomfort. One strategy for strengthening self-integrity is engage in an explicit process of reinforcing sources of self-worth - self-affirmation. Self affirmation interventions have participants engage in an exercise writing about core personal values (a writing induction). In a writing induction, participants review a list of values and are instructed to choose up to two that are important to them. Participants are then asked to write a few sentences about why their chosen values are important to them and identify times in which these values have helped them navigate challenges.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must be at least 18 years of age, have a type 2 diabetes (T2D) diagnosis, and currently use a continue glucose monitor as part of their condition management.
- Participants must be patients of MaineHealth Endocrinology and Diabetes, be at least 18 years of age, have a type 2 diabetes (T2D) diagnosis, and currently use a continue glucose monitor as part of their condition management (Dexcom, FreeStyle Libre).
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals under 18 years of age
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Elizabeth Scharnetzkilead
- MaineHealthcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
MaineHealth Institute for Research, Center for Interdisciplinary and Population Health Research
Westbrook, Maine, 04092, United States
Related Publications (61)
Bayer R. Stigma and the ethics of public health: not can we but should we. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Aug;67(3):463-72. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.017. Epub 2008 May 24.
PMID: 18502551BACKGROUNDCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. (2002). About Prediabetes & Type 2 Diabetes. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/prevention/about-prediabetes.html
BACKGROUNDPuhl RM, Heuer CA. Obesity stigma: important considerations for public health. Am J Public Health. 2010 Jun;100(6):1019-28. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.159491. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
PMID: 20075322BACKGROUNDMajor, B., Hunger, J. M., Bunyan, D. P., & Miller, C. T. (2014). The ironic effects of weight stigma. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.009
BACKGROUNDWu YK, Berry DC. Impact of weight stigma on physiological and psychological health outcomes for overweight and obese adults: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2018 May;74(5):1030-1042. doi: 10.1111/jan.13511. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
PMID: 29171076BACKGROUNDVadiveloo M, Mattei J. Perceived Weight Discrimination and 10-Year Risk of Allostatic Load Among US Adults. Ann Behav Med. 2017 Feb;51(1):94-104. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9831-7.
PMID: 27553775BACKGROUNDTalumaa B, Brown A, Batterham RL, Kalea AZ. Effective strategies in ending weight stigma in healthcare. Obes Rev. 2022 Oct;23(10):e13494. doi: 10.1111/obr.13494. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
PMID: 35934011BACKGROUNDHimmelstein MS, Puhl RM. At multiple fronts: Diabetes stigma and weight stigma in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2021 Jan;38(1):e14387. doi: 10.1111/dme.14387. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
PMID: 32799378BACKGROUNDSteele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 21. Social psychological studies of the self: Perspectives and programs (pp. 261-302). Academic Press.
BACKGROUNDEpton T, Harris PR. Self-affirmation promotes health behavior change. Health Psychol. 2008 Nov;27(6):746-52. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.6.746.
PMID: 19025270BACKGROUNDArmitage CJ, Harris PR, Hepton G, Napper L. Self-affirmation increases acceptance of health-risk information among UK adult smokers with low socioeconomic status. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Mar;22(1):88-95. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.1.88.
PMID: 18298234BACKGROUNDSherman, D. A., Nelson, L. D., & Steele, C. M. (2000). Do messages about health risks threaten the self? Increasing the acceptance of threatening health messages via self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1046-1058.
BACKGROUNDCohen GL, Sherman DK. The psychology of change: self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:333-71. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115137.
PMID: 24405362BACKGROUNDCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (2022, June 29). National Diabetes Statistics Report Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States. Retrieved April 8, 2023, from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html
BACKGROUNDAmerican Diabetes Association (2022, July 28). Statistics About Diabetes. Retrieved April 8, 2023, from https://diabetes.org/about-us/statistics/about-diabetes#:~:text=Prevalence%20in%20seniors%3A%20The%20percentage,diagnosed%20with%20diabetes%20every%20year.
BACKGROUNDHoyt CL, Burnette JL, Thomas FN, Orvidas K. Public Health Messages and Weight-Related Beliefs: Implications for Well-Being and Stigma. Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 17;10:2806. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02806. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31920849BACKGROUNDMajor B, O'Brien LT. The social psychology of stigma. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:393-421. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137.
PMID: 15709941BACKGROUNDPuhl RM, Himmelstein MS, Hateley-Browne JL, Speight J. Weight stigma and diabetes stigma in U.S. adults with type 2 diabetes: Associations with diabetes self-care behaviors and perceptions of health care. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Oct;168:108387. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108387. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
PMID: 32858100BACKGROUNDSaguy AC, Frederick D, Gruys K. Reporting risk, producing prejudice: how news reporting on obesity shapes attitudes about health risk, policy, and prejudice. Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jun;111:125-33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.026. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
PMID: 24785268BACKGROUNDLee KM, Hunger JM, Tomiyama AJ. Weight stigma and health behaviors: evidence from the Eating in America Study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2021 Jul;45(7):1499-1509. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00814-5. Epub 2021 May 1.
PMID: 33934109BACKGROUNDSchabert J, Browne JL, Mosely K, Speight J. Social stigma in diabetes : a framework to understand a growing problem for an increasing epidemic. Patient. 2013;6(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s40271-012-0001-0.
PMID: 23322536BACKGROUNDSteele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 34, pp. 379-440). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80009-0
BACKGROUNDHunger JM, Major B, Blodorn A, Miller CT. Weighed down by stigma: How weight-based social identity threat contributes to weight gain and poor health. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2015 Jun;9(6):255-268. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12172. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
PMID: 29225670BACKGROUNDShapiro JR, Neuberg SL. From stereotype threat to stereotype threats: implications of a multi-threat framework for causes, moderators, mediators, consequences, and interventions. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 May;11(2):107-30. doi: 10.1177/1088868306294790.
PMID: 18453458BACKGROUNDShapiro JR. Different groups, different threats: a multi-threat approach to the experience of stereotype threats. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Apr;37(4):464-80. doi: 10.1177/0146167211398140.
PMID: 21441217BACKGROUNDSteele CM. A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Am Psychol. 1997 Jun;52(6):613-29. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.6.613.
PMID: 9174398BACKGROUNDSchmader T, Johns M, Forbes C. An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;115(2):336-56. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336.
PMID: 18426293BACKGROUNDMuraven M, Baumeister RF. Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychol Bull. 2000 Mar;126(2):247-59. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247.
PMID: 10748642BACKGROUNDPolonsky WH, Fisher L, Guzman S, Villa-Caballero L, Edelman SV. Psychological insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes: the scope of the problem. Diabetes Care. 2005 Oct;28(10):2543-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.10.2543. No abstract available.
PMID: 16186296BACKGROUNDRitholz MD, Smaldone A, Lee J, Castillo A, Wolpert H, Weinger K. Perceptions of psychosocial factors and the insulin pump. Diabetes Care. 2007 Mar;30(3):549-54. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1755.
PMID: 17327319BACKGROUNDSherman, D. A. K., Nelson, L. D., & Steele, C. M. (2000). Do messages about health risks threaten the self? Increasing the acceptance of threatening health messages via self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1046-1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002611003
BACKGROUNDSherman, D. K., Lokhande, M., Müller, T., & Cohen, G. L. (2021). Self affirmation interventions. In G. M. Walton & A. J. Crum (Eds.), Handbook of wise interventions: How social psychology can help people change (pp. 63-99). The Guilford Press.
BACKGROUNDSherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 38, pp. 183-242). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38004-5
BACKGROUNDFerrer RA, Cohen GL. Reconceptualizing Self-Affirmation With the Trigger and Channel Framework: Lessons From the Health Domain. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019 Aug;23(3):285-304. doi: 10.1177/1088868318797036. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
PMID: 30295141BACKGROUNDEpton T, Harris PR, Kane R, van Koningsbruggen GM, Sheeran P. The impact of self-affirmation on health-behavior change: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2015 Mar;34(3):187-96. doi: 10.1037/hea0000116. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
PMID: 25133846BACKGROUNDSherman DK, Hartson KA, Binning KR, Purdie-Vaughns V, Garcia J, Taborsky-Barba S, Tomassetti S, Nussbaum AD, Cohen GL. Deflecting the trajectory and changing the narrative: how self-affirmation affects academic performance and motivation under identity threat. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Apr;104(4):591-618. doi: 10.1037/a0031495. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
PMID: 23397969BACKGROUNDCohen GL, Garcia J, Apfel N, Master A. Reducing the racial achievement gap: a social-psychological intervention. Science. 2006 Sep 1;313(5791):1307-10. doi: 10.1126/science.1128317.
PMID: 16946074BACKGROUNDCohen GL, Garcia J, Purdie-Vaughns V, Apfel N, Brzustoski P. Recursive processes in self-affirmation: intervening to close the minority achievement gap. Science. 2009 Apr 17;324(5925):400-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1170769.
PMID: 19372432BACKGROUNDMiyake A, Kost-Smith LE, Finkelstein ND, Pollock SJ, Cohen GL, Ito TA. Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: a classroom study of values affirmation. Science. 2010 Nov 26;330(6008):1234-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1195996.
PMID: 21109670BACKGROUNDWalton GM, Cohen GL. A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science. 2011 Mar 18;331(6023):1447-51. doi: 10.1126/science.1198364.
PMID: 21415354BACKGROUNDFaul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
PMID: 17695343BACKGROUNDCohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Academic Press.
BACKGROUNDKang H. Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:17. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
PMID: 34325496BACKGROUNDHatzenbuehler ML, Phelan JC, Link BG. Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities. Am J Public Health. 2013 May;103(5):813-21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301069. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
PMID: 23488505BACKGROUNDStangl AL, Earnshaw VA, Logie CH, van Brakel W, C Simbayi L, Barre I, Dovidio JF. The Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework: a global, crosscutting framework to inform research, intervention development, and policy on health-related stigmas. BMC Med. 2019 Feb 15;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1271-3.
PMID: 30764826BACKGROUNDMeadows A, Higgs S. The Multifaceted Nature of Weight-Related Self-Stigma: Validation of the Two-Factor Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-2F). Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 16;10:808. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00808. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31040808BACKGROUNDBrowne JL, Ventura AD, Mosely K, Speight J. Measuring the Stigma Surrounding Type 2 Diabetes: Development and Validation of the Type 2 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-2). Diabetes Care. 2016 Dec;39(12):2141-2148. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0117. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
PMID: 27515964BACKGROUNDVan Der Ven NC, Weinger K, Yi J, Pouwer F, Ader H, Van Der Ploeg HM, Snoek FJ. The confidence in diabetes self-care scale: psychometric properties of a new measure of diabetes-specific self-efficacy in Dutch and US patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):713-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.713.
PMID: 12610027BACKGROUNDSchmitt A, Kulzer B, Ehrmann D, Haak T, Hermanns N. A Self-Report Measure of Diabetes Self-Management for Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: The Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire-Revised (DSMQ-R) - Clinimetric Evidence From Five Studies. Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2022 Jan 13;2:823046. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2021.823046. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 36994332BACKGROUNDChehregosha H, Khamseh ME, Malek M, Hosseinpanah F, Ismail-Beigi F. A View Beyond HbA1c: Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Ther. 2019 Jun;10(3):853-863. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0619-1. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
PMID: 31037553BACKGROUNDPuhl RM, Latner JD, King KM, Luedicke J. Weight bias among professionals treating eating disorders: attitudes about treatment and perceived patient outcomes. Int J Eat Disord. 2014 Jan;47(1):65-75. doi: 10.1002/eat.22186. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
PMID: 24038385BACKGROUNDPolonsky WH, Anderson BJ, Lohrer PA, Welch G, Jacobson AM, Aponte JE, Schwartz CE. Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care. 1995 Jun;18(6):754-60. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.6.754.
PMID: 7555499BACKGROUNDPinel EC. Stigma consciousness: the psychological legacy of social stereotypes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jan;76(1):114-28. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.1.114.
PMID: 9972557BACKGROUNDSwinburn BA, Kraak VI, Allender S, Atkins VJ, Baker PI, Bogard JR, Brinsden H, Calvillo A, De Schutter O, Devarajan R, Ezzati M, Friel S, Goenka S, Hammond RA, Hastings G, Hawkes C, Herrero M, Hovmand PS, Howden M, Jaacks LM, Kapetanaki AB, Kasman M, Kuhnlein HV, Kumanyika SK, Larijani B, Lobstein T, Long MW, Matsudo VKR, Mills SDH, Morgan G, Morshed A, Nece PM, Pan A, Patterson DW, Sacks G, Shekar M, Simmons GL, Smit W, Tootee A, Vandevijvere S, Waterlander WE, Wolfenden L, Dietz WH. The Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change: The Lancet Commission report. Lancet. 2019 Feb 23;393(10173):791-846. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32822-8. Epub 2019 Jan 27. No abstract available.
PMID: 30700377BACKGROUNDPuhl RM, Himmelstein MS, Pearl RL. Weight stigma as a psychosocial contributor to obesity. Am Psychol. 2020 Feb-Mar;75(2):274-289. doi: 10.1037/amp0000538.
PMID: 32053000BACKGROUNDLiu NF, Brown AS, Folias AE, Younge MF, Guzman SJ, Close KL, Wood R. Stigma in People With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2017 Jan;35(1):27-34. doi: 10.2337/cd16-0020.
PMID: 28144043BACKGROUNDvan Koningsbruggen GM, Das E. Don't derogate this message! Self-affirmation promotes online type 2 diabetes risk test taking. Psychol Health. 2009 Jul;24(6):635-49. doi: 10.1080/08870440802340156.
PMID: 20205017BACKGROUNDSpitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
PMID: 16717171BACKGROUNDKroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
PMID: 11556941BACKGROUNDAmerican Psychological Association. (n.d.). APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. https://dictionary.apa.org/wait-list-control-group
BACKGROUNDKroeper, K. M., Williams, H. E., Thompson, S., Hernandez-Colmenares, A., Mills, A., Spencer, S. J., & Murphy, M. C. (in progress). The Social Identity Threat Concerns Scale [data analysis and writing ongoing].
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elizabeth Scharnetzki
MaineHealth
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants are masked to their assigned condition until the end of the study
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Faculty Scientist I
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2024
First Posted
April 4, 2024
Study Start
July 24, 2024
Primary Completion
March 28, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 28, 2027
Last Updated
September 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Upon completion of data collection and throughout the publication and dissemination period.
Our findings will be shared with the science and local communities through scientific publications and professional conference presentations. To ensure study findings are reproduceable, per best practice, statistical code for our analyses will be made available on open science platforms (e.g., Open Science Framework), and deidentified, aggregated data may be available upon request by members of the scientific community. All findings will be reported at the group-level, so nothing can be tied to participants as individuals.