Comparing the Effect of Different Intracanal Dressing on Failed Root Canal Treated Cases on Periapical Healing
Comparison of the Effects of Different Natural and Synthetic Intracanal Medicaments on the Healing of Periapical Lesion in Retreatment Cases (A Randomized Clinical Trial)
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of different intracanal medication between endodontic retreatment visits in previously failed root canal treatment patients (single root canal anteriors or premolars teeth). The main question it aims to answer are:
- Is natural and synthetic intracanal Medicament effective in reducing or complete healing of Periapical lesions or not? the researchers will compare the effect of different intracanal dressing including:
- nanocurcumin gel
- curcumin gel
- ciprofloxacin +ibuprofen gel
- calcium hydroxide Paste as control group in between the endodontic retreatment visits to see if these medicaments work well on periapical lesion healing this outcome measured by Cone beam CT at base and after 1 year follow up period
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jun 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2025
CompletedNovember 17, 2025
November 1, 2025
1.3 years
March 14, 2024
November 13, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
healing of periapical lesion
measured radiographically the periapical lesion volmetric changes by CBCT between preoperative and after1 year follow up
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
antibacterial effect (CFU)
at first visit : S1 :baseline sample, S2 : sample immediately after chemomechanical procedure , at second visit S3: sample after 7 days of placement medication
Interappointment Pain
6,12, 24, 48, 72 hours after 1st visit
Study Arms (4)
Nanocurcumin gel .
EXPERIMENTALPreparation Method: Olive oil (5%), surfactant (Tween 80 (8%)) and co-surfactant (PEG 400 (2%)) were used as excipients and their selection was based on the solubility of curcumin. A high-energy ultrasonication techniquewas used to prepare the Cur-NE. Curcumin (0.3%) was dissolved in oil /surfactant/ co-surfactant mixture and stirred till obtaining clear solution. The mixture was microtitrated with distilled water (85 %) to achieve a coarse emulsion. A 20 kHz ultrasonic processor was used for the production of the desired nano-emulsion. Gel Preparation: 0.4gm of Carboxymethyl cellulose (Loba CHIME, india) was sprinkled gently and gradually over the solution of Cur NE 0.3% under mild temperature with vigorous stirring to get homogenous gel
Curcumin gel
EXPERIMENTALcurcumin 250 mg powder + carboxymethyl cellulose 300mg+distilled water to 10ml
Ciprofloxacin 500 mg +Ibuprofen 400 mg
EXPERIMENTALCiprofloxacin 500 mg +ibuprofen 400mg powder +carboxymethyl cellulose 300 mg +distilled water to 10 ml
calcium hydroxide
ACTIVE COMPARATORMetapaste
Interventions
firstly patient anesthetized, rubber dam isolation , disinfect the crown with 10%H2O2, saline then sodium hypochlorite solution 2.5% then 5% sodium thiosulphate solution to inhibit the effect of NaOHCl then removal of old coronal restoration, disinfection of pulp chamber by the same previous protocol removal of old root canal filling with gates glidden drills and H files , taken first sample S1 from canal with paper point after using saline wash and scrubbing the canal wall the paper points left for 1 min in the canal then preparation of canal with edge endo files till size 45 taper 0.4 and NaOHCL 2.5% between each file and the next finally 5% sodium thiosulphate to inhibit the antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite irrigation then saline irrigation and scrubbing the canal wall and placement of paper points for 1min to taken second sample S2, then dryness of canal and placement of nanocurcumin gel until shown fill the canal under magnification and by using lentulospirals
firstly patient anesthetized, rubber dam isolation , disinfect the crown with 10%H2O2, saline then sodium hypochlorite solution 2.5% then 5% sodium thiosulphate solution to inhibit the effect of NaOHCl then removal of old coronal restoration, disinfection of pulp chamber by the same previous protocol removal of old root canal filling with gates glidden drills and H files , taken first sample S1 from canal with paper point after using saline wash and scrubbing the canal wall the paper points left for 1 min in the canal then preparation of canal with edge endo files till size 45 taper 0.4 and NaOHCL 2.5% between each file and the next finally 5% sodium thiosulphate to inhibit the antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite irrigation then saline irrigation and scrubbing the canal wall and placement of paper points for 1min to taken second sample S2, then dryness of canal and placement of curcumin gel until shown fill the canal under magnification and by using lentulospirals
firstly patient anesthetized, rubber dam isolation , disinfect the crown with 10%H2O2, saline then sodium hypochlorite solution 2.5% then 5% sodium thiosulphate solution to inhibit the effect of NaOHCl then removal of old coronal restoration, disinfection of pulp chamber by the same previous protocol removal of old root canal filling with gates glidden drills and H files , taken first sample S1 from canal with paper point after using saline wash and scrubbing the canal wall the paper points left for 1 min in the canal then preparation of canal with edge endo files till size 45 taper 0.4 and NaOHCL 2.5 % between each file and the next finally 5% sodium thiosulphate to inhibit the antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite irrigation then saline irrigation and scrubbing the canal wall and placement of paper points for 1min to taken second sample S2, then dryness of canal and placement of ciprofloxacin + ibuprofen gel until fill the canal under magnification and by using lentulospirals
firstly patient anesthetized, rubber dam isolation , disinfect the crown with 10%H2O2, saline then sodium hypochlorite solution 2.5% then 5% sodium thiosulphate solution to inhibit the effect of NaOHCl then removal of old coronal restoration, disinfection of pulp chamber by the same previous protocol removal of old root canal filling with gates glidden drills and H files , taken first sample S1 from canal with paper point after using saline wash and scrubbing the canal wall the paper points left for 1 min in the canal then preparation of canal with edge endo files till size 45 taper 0.4 and NaOHCL 2.5 % between each file and the next finally 5% sodium thiosulphate to inhibit the antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite irrigation then saline irrigation and scrubbing the canal wall and placement of paper points for 1min to taken second sample S2, then dryness of canal and placement of calcium hydroxide paste until fill the canal under magnification by using lentulospirals
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Medically free Patients
- both sex includes male and females
- Patients age between 20-60
- Patients agreement positively to share in the study
- patient able to sign informed consent
- on clinical and radiographic examinations, the included teeth maxillary and mandibular single root canal anteriors or premolars suffering from failed endodontic treatment with periapical lesion
You may not qualify if:
- badly broken down teeth indicated for extraction or with difficult isolation
- teeth with former procedural errors as ledge, perforation or instrument separation
- Medically compromised patients
- patients with history of receiving antibiotics within a month before starting study
- periodontally affected teeth by pocket depth \& \> 4mm
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
faculty of dentistry, Ain shams university
Cairo, 11512, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rawda MO Baghdady
faculty of dentistry, zagazig university
- STUDY CHAIR
sarah H Fahmy
faculty of dentistry, Ain Shams university
- STUDY DIRECTOR
karim M El Batouty
faculty of dentistry, Ain Shams university
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2024
First Posted
April 2, 2024
Study Start
June 20, 2024
Primary Completion
September 20, 2025
Study Completion
October 31, 2025
Last Updated
November 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11