Effect of Piezoelectric Surgery on Quality of Life and Periradicular Healing After Endodontic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare the effect of piezo Vs bur on quality of life and healing after endodontic surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2020
CompletedApril 24, 2020
April 1, 2020
1.4 years
April 21, 2020
April 21, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Quality of life assessment
By quality of life questionnaire(Igor Tsesis et al)
Till 1 week after surgery
Postoperative healing
2D radiographic healing by Rud et al and Molven et al criteria and 3D healing by modified PENN 3D criteria
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
hemorrhage control
during surgery
Study Arms (2)
periapical surgery with piezo.
EXPERIMENTALAfter flap reflection bone and root end cutting are done with US6 piezoelectric surgical insert
Periapical surgery with bur.
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter flap reflection bone and root end cutting are done with surgical bur.
Interventions
after flap reflection bone and root end cutting are done with piezoelectric surgical insert
after flap reflection bone and root end cutting are done with surgical bur
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with no general medical contra-indications for oral surgical procedures (ASA-1 or ASA-2).
- Patients of age 16 years and above.
- The tooth to be treated surgically should have a periradicular lesion of strictly endodontic origin (chronic apical periodontitis).
- The nonsurgical re-treatment was judged unfeasible or had previously failed.
- The tooth had an adequate final restoration with no clinical evidence of coronal leakage.
- The apical area of the root canal should be devoid of the presence of a post for at least 6 mm.
- Patients with no acute symptoms.
You may not qualify if:
- Unrestorable tooth.
- Fractured / perforated tooth.
- Apicomarginal defects.
- Through \& through lesions.
- Teeth with deep pockets.
- Serious medical illness(uncontrolled/poorly controlled diabetes, unstable or life threatening conditions or requiring antibiotic prophylaxis).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Post graduate institute of dental sciences
Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
JAYA BHARATHI
POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES, ROHTAK
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2020
First Posted
April 24, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2018
Primary Completion
April 30, 2020
Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
April 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share