Brachio Basilic Arterio Venous Fistula One Stage vs Two Stage
1 other identifier
interventional
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this work was to compare primary failure rates and the primary functional patency of one-stage vs two stage brachiobasilic fistulas to compare the two surgical techniques .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 28, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2025
CompletedApril 5, 2024
April 1, 2024
11 months
March 22, 2024
April 3, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparative study between one stage brachio basilic arterio venous fistula versus two stage
Measures were primary fistula failure rates and patency rates at specific checkpoints.
1 year
Study Arms (2)
One stage group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe one-stage operation was performed under regional anesthesia. A 5-cm incision at the ante cubital fossa identifies the basilic vein. The incision was extended proximally, and the underlying deep fascia was opened. The basilic vein was mobilized up to its junction with the brachial vein. The median cutaneous nerve of the forearm was carefully dissected and preserved. After side branches were ligated, the basilic vein was tunnelled subcutaneously, with a Roberts' forceps maintaining its axial orientation.An end-to-side arteriovenous anastomosisto the brachial artery was performed
two stage group
ACTIVE COMPARATORhe first stage of the two-stage procedure was performed under local anesthesia by formation of the arteriovenous anastomosis with minimal disturbance of the basilic vein. After 4 to 6 weeks, a flow assessment of the AVF by duplex scanning was made to determine if revision of the anastomosis was necessary at the second stage. The second stage was performed under regional anesthesia. The entire length of the basilic vein was mobilized, a"subcutaneous flap" was created, and the vein was positioned anterolaterally. Usually, a further 2 weeks was required before the AVF can be used
Interventions
Comparative study between one stage brachio basilic arterio venous fistula versus two stage
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients with end-stage renal disease who had their BBAVFs created either by the one-stage or two- stage technique.
- Patients with brachial artery diameter more than 3 . mm by duplex ultrasound (DUS).
- Patients with triphasic brachial artery by DUS.
- Patients with basilic vein diameter more than 3 mm by DUS.
- Patients who were able to give informed consent.
- Requirements for intervention agreement between the patient and the surgeon.
- Availability of patients for all follow-up visits.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who already had a suitable cephalic vein for arteriovenous fistula creation.
- Patients whose brachial artery diameter was less than 3 mm by DUS.
- Patients with brachial artery disease proved by DUS.
- Patients whose basilic vein diameter was less than mm by DUS.
- Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- Patients with central venous stenosis or occlusion evidenced by duplex scanning.
- Patients with flexion deformity or skin lesions at the site of the fistula or over the course of the vein.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Bashar K, Healy DA, Elsheikh S, Browne LD, Walsh MT, Clarke-Moloney M, Burke PE, Kavanagh EG, Walsh SR. One-stage vs. two-stage brachio-basilic arteriovenous fistula for dialysis access: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 9;10(3):e0120154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120154. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25751655BACKGROUNDKakkos SK, Lampropoulos GC, Nikolakopoulos KM, Tsolakis IA, Papadoulas SI, Papachristou EC, Goumenos D, Lazarides MK. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Comparing Two-Stage with One-Stage Brachio-Basilic Vein Fistulas. Vasc Specialist Int. 2018 Sep;34(3):51-60. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2018.34.3.51. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
PMID: 30310807BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Haitham A Hasan, Professor
Assiut University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ahmed Kh Sayed, Lecturer
Assiut University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wael A Abdelgawad, Lecturer
Al-Azhar University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2024
First Posted
March 28, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion
April 1, 2025
Study Completion
May 1, 2025
Last Updated
April 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share