Refined Nursing in Rehabilitation Training
Effect of Refined Nursing in Rehabilitation Training for Patients With Brain Injury During the Recovery Period: An Observational Study
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is to explore the clinical effect of refined nursing in rehabilitation training for patients with brain injury during the recovery period. Patients in the control group were provided with routine nursing intervention, while patients in the study group adopted a nursing mode based on the concept of refinement treatment. Comparison was made in terms of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, cognitive function score, functional independence score, nursing satisfaction, and incidence of complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2024
CompletedMarch 26, 2024
May 1, 2022
1.1 years
March 19, 2024
March 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
GCS scores
The highest GCS score was 15 points, indicating clear consciousness; while patients with 13-15, 9-12, and ≤8 points were classified as mild, moderate consciousness disorder, and coma, respectively. Patients with lower scores might indicate more serious consciousness disorder
one day before the intervention
GCS scores
The highest GCS score was 15 points, indicating clear consciousness; while patients with 13-15, 9-12, and ≤8 points were classified as mild, moderate consciousness disorder, and coma, respectively. Patients with lower scores might indicate more serious consciousness disorder
2 months after rehabilitation treatment
cognitive function scores
Cognitive function was evaluated using the Chinese version of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Exam (NCSE) to assess the cognitive function of patients before and 2 months after rehabilitation treatment. This scale includes 10 items, i.e., spatial orientation (12 points), concentration (8 points), understandability (6 points), retelling (12 points), naming (8 points), spatial construction (6 points), memory (12 points), computing (4 points), similarity (8 points), and judgment (6 points)
one day before the intervention
cognitive function scores
Cognitive function was evaluated using the Chinese version of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Exam (NCSE) to assess the cognitive function of patients before and 2 months after rehabilitation treatment. This scale includes 10 items, i.e., spatial orientation (12 points), concentration (8 points), understandability (6 points), retelling (12 points), naming (8 points), spatial construction (6 points), memory (12 points), computing (4 points), similarity (8 points), and judgment (6 points)
2 months after rehabilitation treatment
functional independence scores
Functional Independence Measure (FIM), utilizing a 7-point ordinal scale, was employed to assess the functional independence of two groups of patients before and 2 months after rehabilitation treatment. FIM measures independent performance in self-care, sphincter control, mobility, locomotion, communication, social cognition, etc. The minimum score is 18 points, and the maximum score is 126 points (91 points for motor function and 35 points for cognitive function)
one day before the intervention
functional independence scores
Functional Independence Measure (FIM), utilizing a 7-point ordinal scale, was employed to assess the functional independence of two groups of patients before and 2 months after rehabilitation treatment. FIM measures independent performance in self-care, sphincter control, mobility, locomotion, communication, social cognition, etc. The minimum score is 18 points, and the maximum score is 126 points (91 points for motor function and 35 points for cognitive function)
2 months after rehabilitation treatment
Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS)
The Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS) was used to survey patient's nursing satisfaction. This scale measures patient's satisfaction with nursing care from 19 items, including nurse work ability, communication attitude, psychological counseling, nursing support, safety management, etc. It uses a 1-5 point scoring system, with a maximum possible score of 19-95 points. A score of ≥77, 58\~76, 39\~57 and ≤38 points indicated very satisfied, satisfied, somewhat satisfied, and dissatisfied, respectively. Satisfaction rate= (Cases of very satisfied + satisfied + somewhat satisfied)÷total cases
one day before the intervention
Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS)
The Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS) was used to survey patient's nursing satisfaction. This scale measures patient's satisfaction with nursing care from 19 items, including nurse work ability, communication attitude, psychological counseling, nursing support, safety management, etc. It uses a 1-5 point scoring system, with a maximum possible score of 19-95 points. A score of ≥77, 58\~76, 39\~57 and ≤38 points indicated very satisfied, satisfied, somewhat satisfied, and dissatisfied, respectively. Satisfaction rate= (Cases of very satisfied + satisfied + somewhat satisfied)÷total cases
2 months after rehabilitation treatment
incidence of adverse reactions
Incidence (%)=Number of patients with complications/48×100%
one day before the intervention
incidence of adverse reactions
Incidence (%)=Number of patients with complications/48×100%
2 months after rehabilitation treatment
Study Arms (2)
the intervention group
EXPERIMENTALEstablishment of a hierarchical monitoring and management team, Assessment of pressure injury, Communication, Intervention for pressure ulcer, Rehabilitation training
the control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORtimely introduction of the current patient's condition to family members to alleviate their concerns, maintaining appropriate temperature (20 ℃\~22 ℃) and humidity (60.0%\~70.0%) in the ward, careful observation of vital signs such as heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and blood pressure in patients, rehabilitation training
Interventions
To be specific, the head nurse served as the team leader to conduct comprehensive macro supervision; moreover, there were 3 responsible team leaders and 6 responsible nurses, all of whom had rich clinical nursing experience and solid theoretical knowledge of pressure injury. Consequently, a joint-action mechanism of the head nurse - responsible team leader - responsible nurses was developed to facilitate the unification of the training of nursing content, precautions, etc.
Based on the postoperative coma of patients, the Braden assessment scale was applied to effectively evaluate patients from six dimensions of sensory perception, moisture, activity mode, mobility, nutrition, friction, and shear. The total score was 23 points. Patients scoring 13\~14 points were evaluated by Braden once per week; and those scoring ≤12 points were evaluated at a frequency of 3d/ time.
Through intensive face-to-face communication with family members, timely information on the surgical effect, mechanism of pressure injury, preventive measures, and clinical manifestations through intuitive methods such as PPT and video, family members were taught with basic knowledge of pressure injury, and guided to inform medical staff in a timely manner when patients had symptoms of pressure ulcer. Simultaneously, by case sharing and positive suggestions, family members were supported to alleviate their concerns and improve their coordination with treatment
For patients with a Braden score of \>14 points, attention should be paid to keeping skin dry and clean, regularly changing bed sheets and bedding (once per day). Patients with Braden score of 13-14 points should be provided with sponge mattresses, increased times of turning over once per 2 hours, and soft pillows or foam dressings at the site of occipital protuberance to relieve pressure and prevent pressure injury. For patients with Braden score ≤12 points, medical staff should repeatedly emphasize to their families the harm of pressure injury to postoperative recovery.
After regaining consciousness with stable vital signs, patients received rehabilitation training following the principle of association of activity and inertia in a regular order. Patients were guided to perform upper limb movements, joint flexion, lower limb flexion and extension, as well as daily training such as washing face, rinsing mouth, and dressing at a frequency of 3\~4 times/d. Moreover, patients were advised to minimize violent behaviors such as laughing and talking loudly
timely introduction of the current patient's condition to family members to alleviate their concerns
maintaining appropriate temperature (20 ℃\~22 ℃) and humidity (60.0%\~70.0%) in the ward
careful observation of vital signs such as heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and blood pressure in patients
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients diagnosed with severe TBI through imaging examinations such as head CT and magnetic resonance imaging
- patients with surgical indications
- patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤8 points
- patients with complete clinical data
- patients with written informed consent provided by family members
You may not qualify if:
- patients with organic lesions of major organs such as liver and kidney
- patients with contraindications for surgery
- patients with primary diseases such as cerebral hemorrhage and cerebral infarction
- patients with combined or multiple injuries
- patients with respiratory failure
- patients whose family members had cognitive impairment or abnormal mental behaviors
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Effect of Refined Nursing in Rehabilitation Training for Patients with Brain Injury During the Recovery Period: An Observational Study
Xinxiang, Henan, 453000, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jie Yang
Xinxiang Central Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2024
First Posted
March 26, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2022
Primary Completion
May 31, 2023
Study Completion
January 1, 2024
Last Updated
March 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2022-05