Effect of Auto-Bolus Interval on Analgesic Quality During Labor Analgesia With Dural Puncture Epidural
The Effect of Changing the Programmed Auto Bolus Interval Time On Analgesic Quality of Labor Analgesia With Dural Puncture Epidural Technique: Double-Blind Randomised Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It is aimed in this study to compare the effect of changing the interval time for programmed auto boluses of local anaesthetics on the total anesthetic consumption and quality of labor analgesia with dural puncture epidural technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2025
CompletedApril 2, 2024
March 1, 2024
12 months
March 19, 2024
March 29, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference between total local anaesthetic consumption
The study will involve monitoring the patients starting 2 minutes after the initial epidural dose, every 2 minutes during the first 20 minutes. Monitoring will continue at the 30th minute, and once in every 90 minutes for 5 hours or until labor is completed. Total bupivacain consumption will be calculated as follows: PIEB + PCEA + boluses by the clinician. Bupivacain consumption per hour will be calculated.
5 hours or before if the labor is completed
Study Arms (2)
30-Min Interval
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients will be given 10 ml of a solution containing 0,1% of bupivacaine and 2 mcg/ml fentanyl through the epidural cathether. Level of sensory block will be tested by testing with ice from S2 dermatome cephally. Analgesia will be maintained by programmed intermittant epidural (PIE) boluses of 7,5 ml of 0,0625% of bupivacaine and 2 mcg/ml fentanyl every 30 minutes, starting 1 hour after the loading dose. In addition, patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) will be programmed so that 8 ml of the same solution with a lock-time of 15 minutes may be administered. "Breakthrough pain" that requires even further analgesia will be treated with an epidural bolus of 10 ml of 0,1% bupivacain solution.
60-Min Interval
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients will be given 10 ml of a solution containing 0,1% of bupivacaine and 2 mcg/ml fentanyl through the epidural cathether. Level of sensory block will be tested by testing with ice from S2 dermatome cephally. Analgesia will be maintained by programmed intermittant epidural boluses of 15 ml of 0,0625% of bupivacaine and 2 mcg/ml fentanyl once in every hour, starting 1 hour after the loading dose. In addition, patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) will be programmed so that 8 ml of the same solution with a lock-time of 15 minutes may be administered. "Breakthrough pain" that requires even further analgesia will be treated with an epidural bolus of 10 ml of 0,1% bupivacain solution.
Interventions
10 ml of a solution containing 0,1% of bupivacaine and 2 mcg/ml fentanyl through the epidural cathether, maintained by programmed intermittant epidural (PIE) boluses of 7,5 ml of the same solution once in every 30 minutes, starting 1 hour after the loading dose. patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) will be programmed so that 8 ml of the same solution with a lock-time of 15 minuts may be administered
10 ml of a solution containing 0,1% of bupivacaine and 2 mcg/ml fentanyl through the epidural cathether, maintained by programmed intermittant epidural (PIE) boluses of 15 ml of the same solution once in every hour, starting 1 hour after the loading dose. patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) will be programme
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy nulliparous women
- American Society of Anaesthesiology Score of II
- During active labor
- At weeks 37-42.
- Singlet vertex presentation
- Cervical dilation \<5 cm at the request of labor analgesia
- VAS score \>40
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<20 or \>45,
- Morbid obesity
- Presence of pregnancy-related comorbidities (e.g: gestational diebetes, gestational hypertension and preeclampsia)
- History of drug abuse
- Contrindication for neuraxial blocks
- Conditions that increase the risk of need for cesarean section (e.g. placenta previa, uterus abnormalities or surgeries)
- Diagnosed fetal abnormalities
- Cases where dura gets punctured unintendedly with the epiduralneedle
- Cases where flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is not observed after dural puncture
- Cases where a cesarean section is performed at any stage of labor
- Cases where labor is completed in 1 hour from the start of analgesia procedure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Atatürk University
Erzurum, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
Suzuki N, Koganemaru M, Onizuka S, Takasaki M. Dural puncture with a 26-gauge spinal needle affects spread of epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1996 May;82(5):1040-2. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199605000-00028.
PMID: 8610864BACKGROUNDThomas JA, Pan PH, Harris LC, Owen MD, D'Angelo R. Dural puncture with a 27-gauge Whitacre needle as part of a combined spinal-epidural technique does not improve labor epidural catheter function. Anesthesiology. 2005 Nov;103(5):1046-51. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200511000-00019.
PMID: 16249679BACKGROUNDWilson SH, Wolf BJ, Bingham K, Scotland QS, Fox JM, Woltz EM, Hebbar L. Labor Analgesia Onset With Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Traditional Epidural Using a 26-Gauge Whitacre Needle and 0.125% Bupivacaine Bolus: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2018 Feb;126(2):545-551. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002129.
PMID: 28622178BACKGROUNDKaddoum R, Motlani F, Kaddoum RN, Srirajakalidindi A, Gupta D, Soskin V. Accidental dural puncture, postdural puncture headache, intrathecal catheters, and epidural blood patch: revisiting the old nemesis. J Anesth. 2014 Aug;28(4):628-30. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1761-y. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
PMID: 24347033BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ayşenur Dostbil
Ataturk University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2024
First Posted
March 26, 2024
Study Start
March 15, 2024
Primary Completion
March 1, 2025
Study Completion
August 1, 2025
Last Updated
April 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03