Thoracic Epidural Analgesia With Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Radical Cystectomy Surgery
TEAvsESB
Comparison of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia With Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Radical Cystectomy Surgery: A Randomised Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare between Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA) with ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block in radical cystectomy surgery for analgesic efficacy and hemodynamic effects
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 21, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 30, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 10, 2024
CompletedMarch 3, 2026
February 1, 2026
1 month
January 26, 2024
February 28, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time for first rescue analgesia
the time of request of the patient of analgesia wil be recorded
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Visual analogue scale score at 1st,2nd,4th,6th,8th,12th and 24 h (where 0 is interpreted as no pain, 1-4 mild pain, 5-6 moderate pain, 7-10 severe pain)
24 hours
the number of rescue analgesics within 24hrs after surgery
24 hours
Other Outcomes (2)
The heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure
pulse per minute--mmhge
Complications like bradycardia or hypotension, intraoperative and postoperative dysrhythmia, nausea and vomiting
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Erector Spinae Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORafter induction of anesthesia bilateral US ESP block will be performed in the left lateral decubitus position under strict aseptic precautions. linear ultrasound transducer will be placed in a sterile cover, and positioned on the midline to identify the T10 spinous process. From this position, the ultrasound transducer will be moved 2-3 cm laterally to visualise the hyperechoic line of the T10 transverse process with its associated acoustic shadow inferiorly, and the overlying erector spinae muscle superiorly. Using in-plane approach a needle will be inserted in caudal-cephalad direction, until the tip is contact with the T10 transverse process and will be in the interfacial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle group and A dose of 30 ml 0.125% Bupivacaine will be injected bilateral in this plane . All patients will receive 1g intravenous paracetamol and 4 grams ondansetron 8mg dexamethasone
Thoracic Epidural Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORbefore induction of anesthesia under strict aseptic precautions, 18Gauge Tuohy's needle with Huber's tip will be inserted via median approach after local infiltration with 5 ml of 2% lignocaine at the level of T9-T10 or T10-T11 intervertebral space in the sitting position. After identifying epidural space using loss of resistance technique, 5 ml of saline will be administered after negative aspiration for blood or cerebrospinal fluid and 20Gauge epidural catheter will be threaded 5 cm cranially. the patients in group B will be administered with a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine through epidural catheter followed by continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at the rate of 0.1 ml/kg/hour All patients will receive 1g intravenous paracetamol and 4 grams ondansetron 8mg dexamethasone
Interventions
will receive bilateral Erector Spinae Block after induction of anesthesia
will receive Thoracic Epidural Block before induction of anesthesia .a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine through epidural catheter followed by continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at the rate of 0.1 ml/kg/hour
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Eligible patients will be older than 40-70 years old with american society of ASA physical anesthesiologist status I, II and III scheduled for elective radical cystectomy surgeries
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have allergy to any of the study drugs.
- Patients who are on opioids.
- Known abuse of alcohol or medication.
- Local infection at the site of injection or systemic infection.
- Pregnancy
- Patients with coagulation disorders or on anticoagulation therapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Menoufia Universitylead
- Amal Ismael Abdelrahman Hassancollaborator
- Ibrahim Mowafy Gomaa Atawiacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Menoufia university
Cairo, Shibin Elkom, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
AMAL G SAFAN, MD
Menoufia University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer of anaethesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2024
First Posted
March 21, 2024
Study Start
March 30, 2024
Primary Completion
May 10, 2024
Study Completion
June 10, 2024
Last Updated
March 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02